당신은 주제를 찾고 있습니까 “canare lv-77s vs belden 1694a – Belden 1694a vs Belden 1855a Broadcasting Coaxial Cable Comparison“? 다음 카테고리의 웹사이트 https://chewathai27.com/you 에서 귀하의 모든 질문에 답변해 드립니다: https://chewathai27.com/you/blog. 바로 아래에서 답을 찾을 수 있습니다. 작성자 Discount Low Voltage 이(가) 작성한 기사에는 조회수 14,021회 및 좋아요 30개 개의 좋아요가 있습니다.
canare lv-77s vs belden 1694a 주제에 대한 동영상 보기
여기에서 이 주제에 대한 비디오를 시청하십시오. 주의 깊게 살펴보고 읽고 있는 내용에 대한 피드백을 제공하세요!
d여기에서 Belden 1694a vs Belden 1855a Broadcasting Coaxial Cable Comparison – canare lv-77s vs belden 1694a 주제에 대한 세부정보를 참조하세요
These two cables are in the battle of their life! One will live a happy life indoors while the other will have a hard, tough life living like Bear Grylls outdoors. Cable diameter, shielding, conductor size, HD-SDI signal distance also talked about.
canare lv-77s vs belden 1694a 주제에 대한 자세한 내용은 여기를 참조하세요.
Digital Cable… anyone compare Canare lv 77S to
Kimber D60? Belden 1694A? DH Labs Silver Sonic 750? Canare LV 61S? Straightwire I link? …. Others? What are you using and what have you …
Source: forum.audiogon.com
Date Published: 4/3/2022
View: 3705
Belden vs Canare Cable | Home Theater Forum
My thinkin is since the Canare LV77S is stranded wire it would be … The Belden 1694A would require not only a different crimp die but …
Source: www.hometheaterforum.com
Date Published: 4/29/2022
View: 1576
Brief Review: Belden 1694A and Canare L-5CFB 75 ohm cables
So both cables were assembled without solder. Sonic Characteristics (Belden vs Canare vs Belkin). Even not run-in, I was shocked by …
Source: cheaptubeaudio.blogspot.com
Date Published: 8/23/2021
View: 3759
Which interconnects from Canare, Belden?
But, Canare LV-61S is 24-gauge copper coax with a single-bra shield, … Shield/return resistance on the 1694a is 2.8 ohms /1K ft vs.
Source: forums.stevehoffman.tv
Date Published: 1/21/2021
View: 7384
What People say about Canare! – AVBestBuy.com
As far as cabling goes there are a few options: Belden 1694a is a very good … They use Canare L-5CFB and LV-77S (your choice) for their interconnects and …
Source: www.avbestbuy.com
Date Published: 2/6/2021
View: 8185
Blue Jeans Cable – Belden 1694A & Canare LV-77S w …
Classified: FOR SALE – Blue Jeans Cable – Belden 1694A & Canare LV-77S w/ BONUS Canare BNC/RCA Adapter asking for $35.00.
Source: www.usaudiomart.com
Date Published: 3/28/2021
View: 3411
Shop by Cable Type – Blue Jeans Cable
All of our cable types, from Belden and Canare, are listed here; click on the … Canare LV-77S, Similar to L-5CFB but stranded conductor, more flexible.
Source: www.bluejeanscable.com
Date Published: 3/13/2021
View: 1281
Digital Cables | Page 4 – Super Best Audio Friends
@yotacowboy, have you compared the Oyae to the Belden 1694A (Blue … Quick take: Element Cable (Canare LV-77S) sounds more closed in …
Source: www.superbestaudiofriends.org
Date Published: 8/23/2022
View: 1583
Dh Labs DH-75 or Canare digital???? | Headphone Reviews …
… 1) DH Labs DH-75 cable (available for $60-$70) and 2) Canare LV-77S … You could also try www.bluejeanscable.com for their Belden 1695A …
Source: www.head-fi.org
Date Published: 4/24/2022
View: 531
CANARE DIGIFLEX GOLD Speaker Cables user reviews
Compared to Belden 1694A the Canare is a bit brighter sounding and a bit more … Digiflex Gold is Canare’s marketing name for their Model LV-77S Coax.
Source: www.audioreview.com
Date Published: 11/2/2021
View: 5538
주제와 관련된 이미지 canare lv-77s vs belden 1694a
주제와 관련된 더 많은 사진을 참조하십시오 Belden 1694a vs Belden 1855a Broadcasting Coaxial Cable Comparison. 댓글에서 더 많은 관련 이미지를 보거나 필요한 경우 더 많은 관련 기사를 볼 수 있습니다.
주제에 대한 기사 평가 canare lv-77s vs belden 1694a
- Author: Discount Low Voltage
- Views: 조회수 14,021회
- Likes: 좋아요 30개
- Date Published: 2013. 7. 2.
- Video Url link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCWbtNesiTw
Audiogon Discussion Forum
The Apogee Wyde Eye can be bought on Amazon for $50 for 1m and compares well to pricier digital cables. I actually prefer it to my Stereovox XV2 (descendent of the original D60) as it’s more natural sounding yet still very detailed. This is a great all-around cable that’d be a very good benchmark with which to evaluate pricier options, or you may end up just keeping it as I did. Best of luck.
midareff1 OP Details
Discussions
Posts
This discussion
Message User Edit
Edit Delete michaelklein…. I bought the Silver Sonic and compared it to the Canare I cited. In my system, and results may vary based on systems, it was a bit smoother but the stage was smaller, much further away.. as though the performance was outside my apartment in the street instead of in my listening room, and the stage was flat.. no front to back which the Canare does quite nicely. I sold it on eBay a few days later only to prove my own rule that I shouldn’t buy anything (over $100) I can’t demo first, especially in cable. I’ve also tried the Belden 1694A and it was very shrill and lacked bass in comparison. BTW, 3 feet of the Canare is $20.25 at Blue Jeans.
I have a Kimber D60 and something pricier coming in as audition loaners from the Cable Company in about 10 days and may pickup a Straightwire Info-link I can demo from them next week. Also have a Canare RCAP003F SPDIF Video Cable on order from B&H Photo based on a Stereophile recommendation. I suspect that may prove to be the their 77 or the Canare 61 .. just don’t know until I get it. I’ll post when it comes in and I have some other results. Meanwhile lets keep hearing from you guys on what you have tried.
Belden vs Canare Cable
Larry,
You could use just the LV-77S for everything and it should be fine. The Belden 1694A would require not only a different crimp die but different RCA’s. You could use the Canare L-5CFB which is very similar to the Belden 1694A (both are solid core) but has slightly lower specs. The difference should not be noticeable. It would work with the same crimp die as the LV-77S, but would still require different RCA’s.
If you don’t mind the higher price of the LV-77S over the L-5CFB it will be great for an all purpose cable and is very easy to route due to it’s flexibility.
Brian
Doctorjohn Cheaptubeaudio: Audio Reviews and More: Brief Review: Belden 1694A and Canare L-5CFB 75 ohm cables
music events I have attended. Occasionally, if I find time to attend other arts events, they are duly recorded too.Reviews of CDs, LPs and DVDs I listen to appear in this Audio Blog, however.
For Questions and Comments
Which interconnects from Canare, Belden?
Honestly, the differences between similar coax cables over the short runs we typically use them — 3 feet, 6 feet — connecting line level low impedance sources to high impedance loads, ought to be pretty marginal, and might be as much down to the connectors as to the cables. There’s probably bigger differences to be gained by cleaning and damping your connectors than switching from one similar coax to another. But, Canare LV-61S is 24-gauge copper coax with a single-braid shield, PE dielectric, a capacitance of 21 pF/ft and a shield resistance of 4 ohms per 1,ooo feet.
Beldin 1505F is 21-gauge (so a little thicker/lower resistance conductor), foamed PE dielectric, double braided shield — so more shield coverage, and presumably considerably lower shield resistance (I think that Belden has a shield resistance of around 2.5 ohms/1,000 feet), so both in terms of the better shield coverage and the lower shield resistance the 1505F potentially has better noise rejection performance both in terms of induced noise and in terms of noise from AC leakage, which is among the most common sort of noise in unbalanced hifi. That might not be something that’s audible as lower noise, it might though be audible as more low level inner detail, though sometimes when we lower noise in systems people hear that also as a kind of loss of excitement or sharpness, or as no difference at all. So perception of these small differences differs more than the differences themselves.
On paper the 1505F may be a “better” choice for analog audio, but in practice whether there will be much audible difference between these two fairly similar cables an application like connecting a CD player to a preamp over three-feet, is uncertain. Also, the terminations matter, how are these different cables being terminated?
Click to expand…
What People say about Canare!
Purple X – AVS Forum Buy component cables with the actual cable made by either Canare or Belkin. They actualy provide measured Performance specs for their cable. I got a Canare cable with 75 Ohm Canare RCA plugs (true 75Ohm plugs are not common) from a2zcables.com At 20′ runs, there is a significant difference between this professional quality Canare cable and the same length AR or Monster cable. For a 6′ length, I doubt you’d see any difference.
Monster is way overpriced for what it is. AR is better priced, but the physical cable is not as well constructed.
Alan Maher – AVS Forum Not much of a difference except for the shielding. They both use a foil inner shield, but the Belden uses a braided aluminum shield and the Canare uses a tinned copper shield. And last I checked, aluminum was a poor choice for noise rejection in RF cables. Belden cable in a lot of applications is known for picking up RFI. The tinned copper braid in the Canare is superior in it’s noise rejection. Think of it this way…I use the 18ga Canare up here on my stuff, being prior military, you are aware of what a polluted enviroment a joint Air Force / ARMY post can be like for home theater equipment. I originally used Belden and I had multiple problems…after switching to the Canare I haven’t had any.
Chris – AVS Forum I can’t speak for BetterCables… never auditioned them. However, I use all Canare cables in my setup and couldn’t be happier. I’m unable to tell the difference between them and any of the many cables my friends have brought over to try and “sway” me. Funny thing is, neither can they! When they buy a new piece of equiment and need to expand now, they do so with Canare solid-core (5CFB?) cables and Canare cimp-on true 75-Ohm connectors.
Ricky D – AVS Forum I am using Canare with great results, very well built.
John Moschella – AVS Forum The kind of cable that you use for video transmission and digital connections is the same. Basically what you want is a 75 Ohm transmission line that is well shielded. The connectors are just as important as the cable in maintaining a constant impedance. 75 Ohm BNC connectors are made by a number of manufacturers with Canare among them. However the RCA connector (unlike BNC) is not really a true rf connector and should not be used for these connections. Unfortunately we’re stuck with them as even manufacturers of expensive equipment use them. When I researched this issue a few years ago Canare made the only RCA connectors that came close to a true 75 Ohm connector. Even at that it doesn’t have the frequency response of a BNC connector. So use the Canare RCA for sure. As far as cabling goes there are a few options: Belden 1694a is a very good cable and the Canare 5CFB. They are both RG6 type which you should use for long lenghts. (For short lengths the RG59 type will probably be fine.) The Canare is a little more flexible then the Belden. These are the ones that I have used and they are both very good cables. We’re talking about a $1/ft. for the cable (less for Belden) and about 3-5 per connector. Its easy to do the math and figure out that if you buy long lenghts your getting ripped off. It takes the same amount of time to make a 1 m cable as a 10 m cable. The extra cable itself costs about $25. Yet BetterCables et al. will charge you an arm and a leg for the longer length. That is why I made my own
Alan Maher – AVS Forum I worked for NBC and MTV for a number of years and we always used Canare. Want to know why the cable company uses Belden??? Because it’s cheap in bulk!!!
David A. Frattaroli – AVS Forum I just replaced all (practically) the cables in my system with Canare L-5CFB with Canare connectors. I’ve never used Belden so I can’t offer an opinion there. What I can say is that the Canare cable works great for audio interconnects, sub-woofer interconnects, component video and digital audio. It’s a little stiffer than I like but the quality of the components is great. Using the Canare stripper and crimper results in excellent build as well. I recouped the tool cost and more by selling my Monster cable on Ebay. Back to the point. I believe the video image is somehow “cleaner” and “cooler” than with the MIT component cables I was using. Digital audio seems more “present”. I couldn’t detect a change in analog audio. I suppose however, that more break-in time may be required. Are they better? Well, it depends on how you perceive the results in your system. I love that I can make EXCELLENT cables for a fraction of what something similar costs in the stores. More importantly, I can make them EXACTLY the right length. It’s really cleaned up the back of my wall unit.
jmarconis – AVS Forum I use 15 foot Canare StarQuad balanced microphone cables between a Meridian 568 pre/pro and two Bryston amps. To me, they sound just as good as other high end cables I’ve used in the past, at a fraction of the cost.
Andy Lammer – AVS Forum I have some Canare home-brew XLR interconnects with Neutrik ends. These cost me about $30 to make.
My speakers are triamped and include a Bryston 3-way active cross-over. I use some rather expensive Granite Audio 470 interconnects from DAC to pre-amp, pre-amp to cross-over, and 2 sets from cross-over to amps that run my mids & bass.
However, and this really baffles me, I prefer to use the Canare from the cross-over to the Cinepro amp that drives the tweeters. An EAD amp powers my mids and bass drivers.
I have replaced this Canare cable with much much more expensive Granite Audio 470 XLR, Stealth PGS ( gold ) XLR, and Goertz Sapphire XLR interconnects. And I keep coming back to that “worthless” Canare on my tweeters !
ekdo – AVS Forum 8′ is not going to make any difference in quality. Canare cables are considered one of the best. You can find them on EBay.
Tom Morrow – AVS Forum I’ve been looking into this too, and my conclusions are that RG6 is a good price/size/flexibility/resistance/bandwidth compromise in most situations. I would only think about RG11 if you were doing runs of several hundreds of feet. If you get the right RG6 (I’m considering Canare L-5CFB) bandwidth won’t be an issue.
Boris. – AVS Forum Use Canare cables such as V-5CFB. I have about 25ft run and comparing to an ordinary RG-6 cables I had, the picture noticeably improved. You have to see their cable to appreciate it. It is also not scearily expensive. Buy their BNC connectors and sleeves to terminate the cable.
Chris – AVS Forum Thanks to everybody for the replies. Based on all the info I got here I’m leaning toward Bluejeans cable Canare L-5CFB 35 foot cable (30′ is barely enough) at just uner $100. I checked Rhino out as well and only thier lowest end cable is affordable and comes in the length I want. I’d consider using RG-6 cables with adapters but I can’t seem to find any info on how these hold up picture quality wise to the more expensive cables I’ve seen (or for that matter the more moderately priced ones like the one I’m considering).
eujin – AVS Forum Go on eBay and do a search for “Canare video cable”. You’ll find one or two listings by Cable Solutions. It’s run by a guy named Mark Schneider–he makes fantastic cables for a very decent price and it will look WAY better than any Monster stuff. I’ve bought from him in before and have always been really happy with his product and service. In fact, I just bought a set from him yesterday! Give Mark a shot–you won’t regret it.
HighEndWire – AVS Forum You can get decent quality stuff from sites like: http://www.milestek.com/ I think they start at about $30 or so depending on the length. If you want something a little better you can have sites like www.haveinc.com make you up a nice set of stuff made from Canare cables (www.canare.com). I think Markertek, www.markertek will make them up too. I would guess that the cost would be in the neighborhood of $75 and that is for very good quality. I would most definitely avoid the really cheap stuff with bad connectors like they would sell at places like Target and Walmart
Tim Smith – AVS Forum Ditto on the RG6 (although I didn’t use quad shielded). I used Canare L-5CFB cable and Canare RCAP-C5F rca connectors (these crimp on). (�ͺ�Ӷ���������������������Ѻ��� sub-woffer ��)
rblnr – AVS Forum Many pro audio houses and sound recordists I know use Canare cable. You can get it from www.markertek.com at very reasonable (cheap vs. ‘audiophile’ cables) prices with high quality connectors. I use it in my system which is very revealing, and they are excellent. I have not, however, A/B’d them with cables in the multi-hundred range. I can tell you they are every bit as good as the highly regarded Nordost Solar Winds and Blue Heavens at less than a third of the price
JasonATL – AVS Forum I will also second the recommendation for DIY. I use Chris White’s recipe (getting all of the supplies from www.Markertek.com) for using Canare or Belden coaxial cables. However, I wouldn’t call this route inexpensive unless you need a lot of cables – the right tools are a high fixed cost, but the marginal cost is very low for excellent cables (that even beat MIT’s). For me, I’m wiring an entire new home theater, so the bang for the buck is great with DIY cables.
dpippel – AVS Forum I’m not one who feels that megabuck interconnects make much, if any, difference in the way a system sounds. Poorly CONSTRUCTED cables on the other hand can cause problems that lead to sound degradation. That said, I’ve recently purchased both interconnects and speaker cables from www.heartlandcables.com and am VERY pleased with the materials, workmanship and price. They use Canare L-5CFB and LV-77S (your choice) for their interconnects and Canare 4S11 Star-Quad for speaker runs. Flex wrapping is standard but optional and you can custom configure just about anything and they’ll take care of it for you. Their prices are more than reasonable. Check them out if you’re looking for a quality cable at a really affordable price point. I’m a very satisified customer.
andersbk – AVS Forum Well, not entirely true. Yes it’s a digital signal, however, this digital signal is special in that the clock used by the decoder is extracted from this digital bit stream. If the cable introduces noise (bad cable), the clock extraction can be less than perfect, and can indeed alter the end result — the sound. With S/PDIF it really is more than just it either will work, or it wont (sic). FWIW, search for jitter. I use homemade canare cables and they work great.
John Moschella – AVS Forum For digital audio and component video the Canare RG-6 (L-5CF) and Canare RCA connectors are basically top notch. BetterCables uses Canare stuff but they are cheaper here at http://www.a2zcables.com/a2zcables….5b4+EN/catalogs Not only that the marginal cost for long lengths is very reasonable. Check out the premium video cables that you should also use for digital audio. Hard to beat.
magster – AVS Forum For a digital cable it was no contest against other retail cables as well as Canare cables, highly recomended.
j_thunders – AVS Forum For your Denon receiver, get yourself a basic, good S/PDIF cable and call it done. The Apogee Wyde-Eye is hard to beat for the money, as is the Canare Digiflex Gold.
For video, run component if you can. There are guys on ebay and elsewhere that sell great component sets of canare cables that are cheap and hard to beat–monster won’t, I’ve tried it.
Goi – AVS Forum However, you don’t need to spend tons to get good video quality. Basically, 3 runs of RG59 or RG6 coaxial cables with good 75ohm connectors will do. Try to keep them as short as possible. If you have the expertise, or if you’re willing to try, DIY will probably the cheapest and most fulfilling way to go. Go for either Canare or Belden cables(1695A, 1694A and 1505 are the most recommended) with Canare true 75ohm RCA connectors.
Greg_R – AVS Forum The Extron cable is pretty small (24 gauge)… higher gauge wires will be capable of higher bandwidth (with less loss). RG6 will be better than 24 gauge wire… if you want to go Extron look at their SHR-5 cable. Personally, I would go with the Canare V-5CFB for optimal quality…
magster – AVS Forum All depends on the cables make-up. Stick with well known cables such as Belden and Canare and you should be fine. IMO best performance is obtained with a bare copper conductor and Teflon insulation. Bass responds well to Teflon. RG59/Rg6 (size) is not the important factor. Good sheilding and quality materials are.
Alan Maher – AVS Forum Canare L5CFB is the way to go. Belden cable sucks for video
Frank F – AVS Forum The pro’s use Canare cables and connectors. They are high quality and not overpriced like the “Boutique” cables. You can make them yourself or check ebay. I have purchased a couple from Ebay sellers who have stores and have been very satisfied.
magster – AVS Forum if you are looking for a cheap solution then any old RG6 cable will work. Problem is you end up with terrible sound. Especially on components such as these. Often the cheap RG6 cable you mention uses tinned copper conductor or worse aluminum. The braid is usually aluminum and the coverage is not high. Often they use the brute force approach and use multi layers of shileding to help the cable. At the very least one should use bare copper center conductor, foamed insulation and high percentage of shielding ( tinned copper or bare copper) The Canare cable makers will do nicely if cheaper cable is desired. The Rhinocables are simply better because of the materials they use in the cables ( teflon,bare copper etc..)You will get a better pitch with tighter bass by using quality material in the cable construction. If you want flabby or bloated bass then any old coax will do. If youwant to try the DIY approach, use quality cable and connectors. You can purchase Canare, Gepco,comscope or Belden cable in bulk on-line and make a nice cable. Depending on the cable and connectors you buy the savings maybe anywhere from 75% to only 20% It is a fun project and easy to do so give it some consideration.
mwschneider – AVS Forum I realize that I may be rather biased, but have you seen Canare cables? You can get professional quality for a reasonable price.
Kendrid – AVS Forum I bought a 12′ Canare component cable for $55 shipped. It is insulated and constructed very well. I ordered the cable at 1pm and had it the next day (they are in the south Chicago burbs and I am in the north). I am very impressed with them and the cables they make. Best bang for the buck.
Stymlie – AVS Forum If you look at the designs of most component video cables you will see a strong resemblance to RG-6; 18 AWG solid copper conductors, foamed poly dielectrics, etc. We’ve had this discussion over and over at the “Spot” and the conclusion is, don’t pay more for identical cable designs just because of advertising hype. As an example, you can purchase component video cables with Canare connectors from www.avcable.com for around $39. Probably cheaper at AtoZcable,AR, and others.
Max Menon – AVS Forum Suggest that you buy a Canare V3-4CFB cable (at the minimum). They are wonderful cables. If you can swing it, get the V3-5CFB … that is what I use for which I gladly sacrificed our weekly happy hour at the local steakhouse (not to mention that I used to then pay the local gym to let me come and burn that fat !). But seriously … if you know which HDTV you want … spend a couple of hours shopping around to get the lowest price and you can easily afford the cable with the money saved. I bought my Toshiba TW56X81 in Nov 1999 for $3000 and got free shipping and a free Hifi VCR. Made me feel less guilty buying an expensive cable ps – FYI … The Better Cables comp cable is a V3-4CFB cable.
Ruben – AVS Forum I LOVE the quality of Canare cables, I personally use them from my DVD to my TV & from my HDTV set up box to my TV,I work in a state of the art satellite broadcast facility & they use canare cables, in my opinion I can absolutely recommend them!!! Cables are just like any thing else you get what you pay there are cheap & good cables, think of your cables as the arteries of your system, if you get low quality cables you are not going to get all the juice from your set up !! but then every body has a different opinion.
Spiky – AVS Forum markertek.com will sell you a Canare cable that will be better than Monster for much less. (although this one won’t be pretty)
HBart – AVS Forum The better cables component video cable is Canare component cable with Canare connectors. Very good stuff. If you want to save some bucks buy the Canare cable for $2 a foot and the 6 connectors for $3 each and make it yourself – no soldering required. If you don’t feel like the hassle, get the better cables one
videoshielded – audio asylum You can find Canare/Canare and Canare/Belden component video cables on EBay for less than the price of those Monsters. The Canare cables have generated quite a favorable buzz from consumer users on the consumer audio review forums.
Kevin – audio asylum To me and my system, L-5CFB working out very nicely. That is what I use for the last 3 months, and I will keep it in there for a while.
PG – audio asylum Here’s a little insight for all of you. I bought a 5 meter Apogee Wyde eye recently, I cut it open, guess what I found?!!!! It is nothing more than Canare LV-61S with Canare RCAP-C4A connectors. Otherwise known as the Canare Digiflex Gold. I verified this directly from Canare who make custom runs for anyone who can afford it!!!!! Since I make cables, I cut it into 4 individual cables and reterminated with a Canare RCAP-C4A I resold them with no problem, what a marketing Hype.
Corbett – audio asylum The Canare Digiflex Gold True 75 Ohm coax is a great value at $26.
MVA – audio asylum Try the Canare AES/EBU. Inexpensive and outperforms many big buck cables, not quite as good as my Orchid but a steal at the price.
Shop by Cable Type — Blue Jeans Cable
Cable Type Index
All of our cable types, from Belden and Canare, are listed here; click on the links below to see a complete price list for each cable.
Digital Cables
Quote:
Silver or Silver-Plated Cables
Broadcast-quality cables are generally made with copper conductors; but it’s not uncommon, in the consumer a/v market, to run into cables made with silver, or silver-plated copper, conductors. Why is this?
There is one respect in which silver is a better material for cable construction than copper: it is slightly (about 5%) less resistive (that is, more conductive) than annealed copper. “Resistance” is the property of any material which causes some of the electricity that flows through it to be converted into heat, and it’s fair to say that resistance, in cables, is a bad thing–the less the better. All else being equal, lower resistance ought to be a good thing, and therefore one might think that silver would make for a better cable than copper.
That would indeed be so, but there are some other factors to take into account. First, the resistive loss in high-quality copper cables is already extremely small, because copper, though marginally less conductive than silver, is an extremely conductive metal. For example, Belden 1694A’s center conductor resistance is 6.4 ohms per thousand feet. In a very long home theater run of 50 feet, then, the resistance of the conductor is 0.32 ohms, representing a minuscule cause of signal loss in a 75 ohm impedance video circuit; a solid silver conductor would drop this resistance by about five percent, resulting in a truly infinitesimal improvement.
This infinitesimal improvement might be worth something under extreme circumstances, all else being equal–but all else is rarely equal. First, silver is a more brittle material than copper, compromising the cable’s flex-life. To solve this problem, silver is often plated over a copper wire–diminishing the conductivity benefit. Second, the conductivity benefit, as often as not, is offset by a reduction in wire gauge. Going from an 18 AWG conductor to a 20 AWG conductor, for example, results in an increase in resistance of over 50%; this swamps the conductivity benefit of silver, so that an 18 AWG copper conductor is more conductive, not less, than a 20 AWG silver or silver-plated conductor. When the comparison is between full-sized copper cables and silver-plated mini-coax of tiny gauge, like those one sees in many popular silver cable products, there’s no contest; full-sized copper cables are dramatically more conductive, silver or no silver.
Click to expand…
Dh Labs DH-75 or Canare digital????
Originally posted by mikel51
Sean–great info–thanks. How would you rate the difference between the Blue Jean 1695s and the Stereovox HDVX. Both would be withing my budget. The run from my PC to DAC is within reach of a 1 meter interconnect. My goal is richness, smoothness and lack of sibilance in sound.
Quote:Okay, just did a quick little comparison. I clearly prefer the HDXV. Now, that said we’re not talking earth shattering differences here and certainly not anything like 5 times the performance as the cost difference would suggest but we all know it doesn’t go like that. Basically with the HDXV in place, again between the DIP and DAC, I hear a little more quiet background and with that I hear what seems like a more pure, clear, clean and coherent presentation of the music. Tonally I found the Belden 1695a based cable to be ever so slightly cooler sounding with a tad bit more of an up front rendition of instruments in space. The HDXV seems to have a bit more depth and what seems like a little more accuracy in portraying spatial ques. Looking specifically at the spectrum I found the bass to be about the same, midrange is comparable with the edge going to the HDXV again sounding a little cleaner, more full and with more depth. The treble is where I hear a fair amount of discernable difference where the HDXV has a bit more of a sweeter and more delicate treble that sounds cleaner to me. Resolution and detail is very comparable. It’s slight albeit noteable their differences but appreciable in my system.I would say based on what you are looking for in what you described I believe the HDXV has the edge if you are willing to make the investment. The HDXV is a great sounding cable. However that said because their differences are fairly narrow looking at it from a broad perspective this says a lot about the Belden 1695a cable and the unbelievable value the Blue Jeans option represents at 1/5th of the price. One certainly can’t go wrong here either. It’s interesting that I have found impressions of the HDXV all across the board it would seem where people at Audio Circle have said it can sound a tad bright or quite detailed and then others at Audio Asylum and even Ack! Industries say (even in their ad for this cable on their upcoming new web site) that the HDXV has a bit of a more relaxed and sweeter sound with a fuller midrange. Perhaps some of the comments about it sounding brighter were from people who had not broken the cable in, I don’t know as I never would characterize it in that way and agree much with Ack!’s assessment of it. I recall I did put a good couple hundred hours on mine before really listening to it though too.The HDXV has a high cool factor as it’s very thin and looks very cool, and a lot of people don’t know it is in fact a BNC terminated cable that comes with some really nifty cool BNC > RCA adapters. Anyway, hope this helps. Wow, lot of hijaking and long posts on my part today. Make note: Must get a life.
CANARE DIGIFLEX GOLD Speaker Cables user reviews : 4.3 out of 5
[Feb 01, 2005] Makz AudioPhile Strength: Enormous soundstage, very realistic, natural sound, well balanced, very..umm..yes…musical… and, let’s not forget, it’s cheap as chips… Weakness: Needs a little extra investment in ferrite beads, that’s all Mainly because of the favourable reviews on this page, I decided to give this cable a go. What the heck, for this money I’ll try almost anything… Mine was customized to 1,5 meters length, so only the 75 Ohm BNC plugs are purple, the rest is black (which is a bit of a shame, really…I’ll take purple anytime over standard black). After two weeks of burn-in (mostly using the Purist Audio CD), I sat down and had a serious listen. The first thing that was apparent right from the off was the enormaous amount of soundstage that appeared. It was hard to imagine that all this space had been clodded up all that time in my Ensemble Digiflux that I used before. Bass seemed a little slimmer, but that turned out to be “more precise” and “uncoloured” rather than “less”. And the mids were a little lightweight. With the enormous soundstage however also came a feature that seems to be a “package deal” when it comes to stereo and depth imaging; a lot more detail, especially in the higher frequencies. So much more even, that I was wondering if the highs were not too bright. An audiophile friend of mine, who came by to have a listen, confirmed my deapest fear. There was too much high, it was too “fresh”. I decided to bring the cable over to him, to see how it compared to his Goldmund Lineal. And alas, same result. But that is not the end of this story. Hold on to your hats… My friend used two ferrite beads around the outer ends of his Goldmund (right behind the plugs), so I decided to see what this would do with the Canare. What happened was the most significant piece of proof that ferrite beads really work. The harshness was completely gone, and we were left with a holographic soundstage of humongous proportions. Our jaws still hurt from hitting the floor! Everything fell into place now. Bass was tighter, more precise, and more uncoloured, so that the natural sounds of the instrument (wood for acoustic bass) were finally audible. The mids had more “weight” or “substance” and vocals were frighteningly uncoloured. No pale or “hand in mouth” vocals anymore, no sir! And finally the highs… Man, this was some seriously good stuff we heard. We had a drummer present, and he could tell the brand of the cymbals, and he could even hear that they were too old and fairly beatten. No overpronounciation on the S-es, t’s or other short consonants, as a matter of fact, on some critical recordings, it was possible to make out, for the first time, the difference between S-es and t’s. In conclusion, we were startled. The Goldmund (original price approx. $600) was completely humiliated by this cheapster. And no, I have no shares in Canare, neither do I hold a grudge agains Goldmund. It is, by all means, a matter of facts. So keep in mind that this cable is manufactured without the ferrite beads. But they are easy to get, and rather cheap. And is is a definite must to get the most out of this remarkable digital interlink. Similar Products Used: Ensemble Digiflux Goldmund LinealOVERALL
RATING 5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ VALUE
RATING 5 ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
키워드에 대한 정보 canare lv-77s vs belden 1694a
다음은 Bing에서 canare lv-77s vs belden 1694a 주제에 대한 검색 결과입니다. 필요한 경우 더 읽을 수 있습니다.
이 기사는 인터넷의 다양한 출처에서 편집되었습니다. 이 기사가 유용했기를 바랍니다. 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오. 매우 감사합니다!
사람들이 주제에 대해 자주 검색하는 키워드 Belden 1694a vs Belden 1855a Broadcasting Coaxial Cable Comparison
- 1855a
- Belden 1855A
- belden 1694A
- 1694a
- belden cable
- Belden Inc. (Business Operation)
- broadcasting cable
- coax
- television
- hdtv
- hd-sdi
- Coaxial Cable
Belden #1694a #vs #Belden #1855a #Broadcasting #Coaxial #Cable #Comparison
YouTube에서 canare lv-77s vs belden 1694a 주제의 다른 동영상 보기
주제에 대한 기사를 시청해 주셔서 감사합니다 Belden 1694a vs Belden 1855a Broadcasting Coaxial Cable Comparison | canare lv-77s vs belden 1694a, 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오, 매우 감사합니다.
