당신은 주제를 찾고 있습니까 “i3 6100 vs fx 6300 – Intel Core i3 6100 vs AMD FX-6300 vs Core i3 4130 CPU Gaming Benchmarks“? 다음 카테고리의 웹사이트 https://chewathai27.com/you 에서 귀하의 모든 질문에 답변해 드립니다: https://chewathai27.com/you/blog. 바로 아래에서 답을 찾을 수 있습니다. 작성자 Digital Foundry 이(가) 작성한 기사에는 조회수 346,429회 및 좋아요 1,879개 개의 좋아요가 있습니다.
i3 6100 vs fx 6300 주제에 대한 동영상 보기
여기에서 이 주제에 대한 비디오를 시청하십시오. 주의 깊게 살펴보고 읽고 있는 내용에 대한 피드백을 제공하세요!
d여기에서 Intel Core i3 6100 vs AMD FX-6300 vs Core i3 4130 CPU Gaming Benchmarks – i3 6100 vs fx 6300 주제에 대한 세부정보를 참조하세요
It’s a budget CPU face-off, as we stack up two generations of Core i3 with the AMD FX-6300. Note that faster RAM can make a difference in CPU-bound situations. It’s just a shame our AM3+ plus wouldn’t allows us to run our DDR3 any faster.
Read our full article: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-intel-core-i3-6100-review
Subscribe for more console and PC tech analysis: http://bit.ly/DFSubscribe
i3 6100 vs fx 6300 주제에 대한 자세한 내용은 여기를 참조하세요.
AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i3-6100 – UserBenchmark
Based on 363199 user benchmarks for the AMD FX-6300 and the Intel Core i3-6100, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best …
Source: cpu.userbenchmark.com
Date Published: 10/7/2022
View: 8566
AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i3-6100: What is the difference?
Why is AMD FX-6300 better than Intel Core i3-6100? · 2.84x faster CPU speed ? 6 x 3.5GHzvs2 x 3.7GHz · 2 more CPU threads ? 6vs4 · 5.5MB bigger L2 cache ? 6MBvs0.5 …
Source: versus.com
Date Published: 11/14/2021
View: 3719
AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i3-6100 – Technical City
Comparing AMD FX-6300 with Intel Core i3-6100: technical specs, games and benchmarks. … P0 Vcore voltage, Min: 1.15 V – Max: 1.3875 V, no data …
Source: technical.city
Date Published: 4/28/2022
View: 4811
Intel Core i3-6100 vs AMD FX-6300 – Benchmark, comparison …
Benchmark, test, review, comparison and differences between these CPUs in Cinebench 23 and Geekbench 5.
Source: www.cpu-monkey.com
Date Published: 3/3/2022
View: 7125
AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i3-6100 – CPU-World
Pros and Cons summary ; FX-6300, Core i3-6100 ; General recommendations: Supports XOP instructions, Can be effortlessly overclocked. General …
Source: www.cpu-world.com
Date Published: 2/15/2022
View: 6124
AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i3-6100 – GadgetVersus
Comparison between AMD FX-6300 and Intel Core i3-6100 with the specifications of the processors, the number of cores, threads, cache memory, …
Source: gadgetversus.com
Date Published: 9/28/2022
View: 3114
Intel Core i3-6100 3.7GHz compare AMD FX-6300 CPU
In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD FX-6300 is noticeably better than the Intel Core i3-6100 3.7GHz when it comes to running the latest games.
Source: www.game-debate.com
Date Published: 1/18/2022
View: 9418
Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz vs AMD FX … – CPU Benchmarks
Comparing Intel Core i3-6100 @ 3.70GHz vs AMD FX-6300 Six-Core vs Intel Core i5-6500 @ 3.20GHz.
Source: www.cpubenchmark.net
Date Published: 7/16/2021
View: 7027
Best Budget CPU Face-Off! Pentium G4560 vs Core i3 6100 …
… breakdown vs the Core i3 6100 and the AMD FX6300.
Source: itrum.vn
Date Published: 3/24/2021
View: 3877
주제와 관련된 이미지 i3 6100 vs fx 6300
주제와 관련된 더 많은 사진을 참조하십시오 Intel Core i3 6100 vs AMD FX-6300 vs Core i3 4130 CPU Gaming Benchmarks. 댓글에서 더 많은 관련 이미지를 보거나 필요한 경우 더 많은 관련 기사를 볼 수 있습니다.
주제에 대한 기사 평가 i3 6100 vs fx 6300
- Author: Digital Foundry
- Views: 조회수 346,429회
- Likes: 좋아요 1,879개
- Date Published: 2015. 10. 25.
- Video Url link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5ejBlynOV8
AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i3-6100: What is the difference?
1. CPU speed 6 x 3.5GHz 2 x 3.7GHz The CPU speed indicates how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU, considering all of its cores (processing units). It is calculated by adding the clock rates of each core or, in the case of multi-core processors employing different microarchitectures, of each group of cores.
2. CPU threads 6 4 More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking.
3. turbo clock speed 4.1GHz Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Intel Core i3-6100) When the CPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.
4. Has an unlocked multiplier ✔ AMD FX-6300 ✖ Intel Core i3-6100 Some processors come with an unlocked multiplier which makes them easy to overclock, allowing you to gain increased performance in games and other apps.
5. L2 cache 6MB 0.5MB A larger L2 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
6. L3 cache 8MB 3MB A larger L3 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
7. L1 cache 288KB 128KB A larger L1 cache results in faster CPU and system-wide performance.
8. L2 core 1MB/core 0.25MB/core More data can be stored in the L2 cache for access by each core of the CPU.
FX-6300 vs Core i3-6100 [in 4 benchmarks]
General info
Comparing FX-6300 and Core i3-6100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating 1338 1315 Value for money 1.74 4.80 Market segment Desktop processor Desktop processor Series no data Intel Core i3 Architecture codename Vishera (2012−2015) Skylake (2015−2016) Release date 23 October 2012 (9 years ago) 1 September 2015 (6 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) no data $117 Price now $92 $120 (1x MSRP)
Value for money To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors. 0
50
100 0
50
100
Technical specs
FX-6300 and Core i3-6100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores 6 (Hexa-Core) 2 (Dual-core) Threads 6 4 Base clock speed 3.5 GHz 3.7 GHz Boost clock speed 3.8 GHz 3.7 GHz Bus support no data 4 × 8 GT/s L1 cache 288 KB 64K (per core) L2 cache 6144 KB 256K (per core) L3 cache 8192 KB 3 MB (shared) Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm Die size 315 mm2 150 mm2 Maximum core temperature 71 °C 65 °C Maximum case temperature (TCase) no data 65 °C Number of transistors 1,200 million 1,400 million 64 bit support + + Windows 11 compatibility – – Unlocked multiplier no data – P0 Vcore voltage Min: 1.15 V – Max: 1.3875 V no data
Compatibility
Information on FX-6300 and Core i3-6100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1 Socket AM3+ FCLGA1151 Thermal design power (TDP) 95 Watt 51 Watt
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Core i3-6100. You’ll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions no data Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 AES-NI + + FMA + no data AVX + + vPro no data – Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) no data + Turbo Boost Technology no data – Hyper-Threading Technology no data + TSX no data – Idle States no data + Thermal Monitoring no data + SIPP no data –
Security technologies
FX-6300 and Core i3-6100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT no data – EDB no data + Secure Key no data + MPX no data + Identity Protection no data + SGX no data Yes with Intel® ME OS Guard no data +
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Core i3-6100 are enumerated here.
AMD-V + no data VT-d no data + VT-x no data + EPT no data +
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Core i3-6100. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types DDR3-1866 DDR4 Maximum memory size no data 64 GB Max memory channels no data 2 Maximum memory bandwidth no data 34.1 GB/s ECC memory support no data +
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card no data Intel HD Graphics 530 Max video memory no data 64 GB Quick Sync Video no data + Clear Video no data + Clear Video HD no data + Graphics max frequency no data 1.05 GHz InTru 3D no data +
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of FX-6300 and Core i3-6100 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported no data 3 eDP no data + DisplayPort no data + HDMI no data + DVI no data +
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by FX-6300 and Core i3-6100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support no data + Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 no data 4096×2304@24Hz Max resolution over eDP no data 4096×2304@60Hz Max resolution over DisplayPort no data 4096×2304@60Hz Max resolution over VGA no data N/A
Graphics API support
APIs supported by FX-6300 and Core i3-6100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX no data 12 OpenGL no data 4.5
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Core i3-6100.
AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i3-6100
AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i3-6100
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page
Specifications:
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
Performances :
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Equivalence:
See also:
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the AMD FX-6300 on one side and the Intel Core i3-6100 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 3.8GHz. The second is used on the desktop segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.Suggested PSU: We assume that we have An ATX computer case, a high end graphics card, 16GB RAM, a 512GB SSD, a 1TB HDD hard drive, a Blu-Ray drive. We will have to rely on a more powerful power supply if we want to have several graphics cards, several monitors, more memory, etc.Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.The processor AMD FX-6300 has more cores, the maximum frequency of AMD FX-6300 is greater, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Core i3-6100 is less. The Intel Core i3-6100 was started more recently.Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.In single core, the difference is 83%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 8%.CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data about the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the single thread, as well as for the multi thread.In single core, the difference is -39%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 14%.Cinebench R15 evaluates the performance of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses sharp and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.In single core, the difference is -44%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 5%.Cinebench R23 is cross-platform testing software that allows you to assess the hardware capabilities of a device such as a computer, tablet, server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately even more relevant. The test scene contains no less than 2,000 objects and more than 300,000 polygons in total.In single core, the difference is 50%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.In single core, the difference is 69%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.In single core, the difference is -13%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 61%.In single core, the difference is -44%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 6%.In single core, the difference is 98%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 6%.Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Intel Core i3-6100 3.7GHz compare AMD FX-6300 CPU
Gaming Performance Comparison
In terms of overall gaming performance, the AMD FX-6300 is noticeably better than the Intel Core i3-6100 3.7GHz when it comes to running the latest games. This also means it will be less likely to bottleneck more powerful GPUs, allowing them to achieve more of their gaming performance potential. Both the Core i3-6100 3.7GHz and the FX-6300 were released at the same time, so are likely to be quite similar. Both CPUs exhibit very powerful performance, so it probably isn’t worth upgrading from one to the other, as both are capable of running even the most demanding games at the highest settings (assuming they are accompanied by equivalently powerful GPUs).
The 6 has 4 more cores than the Core i3-6100 3.7GHz. { With 6 cores, the 6 is much less likely to struggle with the latest games, or bottleneck high-end graphics cards when running them. The FX-6300 has 2 more threads than the Core i3-6100 3.7GHz. The FX-6300 has one thread per physical core, whereas the $strippedName1 uses hyperthreading and has 2 logical threads per physical core. Multiple threads are useful for improving the performance of multi-threaded applications. Additional cores and their accompanying thread will always be beneficial for multi-threaded applications. Hyperthreading will be beneficial for applications optimized for it, but it may slow others down. For games, the number of threads is largely irrelevant, as long as you have at least 2 cores (preferably 4), and hyperthreading can sometimes even hit performance. More important for gaming than the number of cores and threads is the clock rate. Problematically, unless the two CPUs are from the same family, this can only serve as a general guide and nothing like an exact comparison, because the clock cycles per instruction (CPI) will vary so much. The Core i3-6100 3.7GHz and FX-6300 are not from the same family of CPUs, so their clock speeds are by no means directly comparable. Bear in mind, then, that while the Core i3-6100 3.7GHz has a 0.2 GHz faster frequency, this is not always an indicator that it will be superior in performance, despite frequency being crucial when trying to avoid GPU bottlenecking. As such, we need to look elsewhere for more reliable comparisons.
Aside from the clock rate, the next-most important CPU features for PC game performance are L2 and L3 cache size. Faster than RAM, the more cache available, the more data that can be stored for lightning-fast retrieval. L1 Cache is not usually an issue anymore for gaming, with most high-end CPUs eking out about the same L1 performance, and L2 is more important than L3 – but L3 is still important if you want to reach the highest levels of performance. Bear in mind that although it is better to have a larger cache, the larger it is, the higher the latency, so a balance has to be struck. The FX-6300 has a 5632 KB bigger L2 cache than the Core i3-6100 3.7GHz, which means that it, at worst, wins out in this area, and at best, will provide superior gaming performance and will work much better with high-end graphics cards.
Best Budget CPU Face-Off! Pentium G4560 vs Core i3 6100 vs AMD FX-6300
Tác giả: Nguyễn Nam
Xin chào các bạn, mình là Nguyễn Nam. Mình là người yêu thích công nghệ nên mình đã thành lập ra website này để chia sẻ những thông tin, thủ thuật về công nghệ hoàn toàn miễn phí đến cho bạn. Rất mong những thông tin này mang lại nhiều giá trị cho bạn. Xem tất cả bài viết của Nguyễn Nam
키워드에 대한 정보 i3 6100 vs fx 6300
다음은 Bing에서 i3 6100 vs fx 6300 주제에 대한 검색 결과입니다. 필요한 경우 더 읽을 수 있습니다.
이 기사는 인터넷의 다양한 출처에서 편집되었습니다. 이 기사가 유용했기를 바랍니다. 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오. 매우 감사합니다!
사람들이 주제에 대해 자주 검색하는 키워드 Intel Core i3 6100 vs AMD FX-6300 vs Core i3 4130 CPU Gaming Benchmarks
- Central Processing Unit (Computer Peripheral)
- Intel Core (Computer Processor)
- Intel Corporation (Business Operation)
- Advanced Micro Devices (Venture Funded Company)
- Core i3-6100
- Core i3 6100
- AMD FX-6300
- FX-6300
- i3 6100
- i3-6100
- i3-4130
- i3 4130
- Core i3-4130
- Core i3 4130
- Does faster RAM matter
- 2133MHz
- 2666MHz
- memory
- RAM
- 1600MHz RAM
- Intel Core I3 (Computer Processor)
- Skylake
- Haswell
- Vishera
- performance
- benchmarks
- Gaming
- Gaming Computer (Literature Subject)
Intel #Core #i3 #6100 #vs #AMD #FX-6300 #vs #Core #i3 #4130 #CPU #Gaming #Benchmarks
YouTube에서 i3 6100 vs fx 6300 주제의 다른 동영상 보기
주제에 대한 기사를 시청해 주셔서 감사합니다 Intel Core i3 6100 vs AMD FX-6300 vs Core i3 4130 CPU Gaming Benchmarks | i3 6100 vs fx 6300, 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오, 매우 감사합니다.
