당신은 주제를 찾고 있습니까 “soundcraft si expression vs behringer x32 – Digital Mixers: A Hands On Comparison of Behringer Soundcraft PreSonus and Roland“? 다음 카테고리의 웹사이트 https://chewathai27.com/you 에서 귀하의 모든 질문에 답변해 드립니다: https://chewathai27.com/you/blog. 바로 아래에서 답을 찾을 수 있습니다. 작성자 SonicSenseProAudio 이(가) 작성한 기사에는 조회수 140,945회 및 좋아요 537개 개의 좋아요가 있습니다.
Table of Contents
soundcraft si expression vs behringer x32 주제에 대한 동영상 보기
여기에서 이 주제에 대한 비디오를 시청하십시오. 주의 깊게 살펴보고 읽고 있는 내용에 대한 피드백을 제공하세요!
d여기에서 Digital Mixers: A Hands On Comparison of Behringer Soundcraft PreSonus and Roland – soundcraft si expression vs behringer x32 주제에 대한 세부정보를 참조하세요
A professional live sound engineer compares 4 digital mixers in a working environment. The Behringer X32, Soundcraft’s Si Expression, PreSonus’ StudioLive, and the m200i from Roland Systems Group.
To read more about this mixer comparison, check out our blog post at: http://www.sonicsense.com/resourcecenter/reviews/mixers-consoles/x32-si-expression-studiolive-and-m-200i-a-digital-mixer-hands-on-experience
Audio Output Comparison:
http://www.sonicsense.com/resourcecenter/reviews/mixers-consoles/presonus-studiolive-32-4-2-ai-vs-studiolive-24-4-2
For more comparisons, demos, and tutorials, visit the Sonic Sense Resource Center: http://www.sonicsense.com/resourcecenter/
Follow us:
Twitter: http://goo.gl/VEP8Qy
SSRC: http://goo.gl/5Z2etJ
Facebook: http://goo.gl/G39JcM
Pinterest: http://goo.gl/6RnXEI
Google Plus: http://goo.gl/lyPXjt
Youtube: http://goo.gl/2rwqaC
soundcraft si expression vs behringer x32 주제에 대한 자세한 내용은 여기를 참조하세요.
Stuck on X32 vs. Si Expression, help please? – Reddit
Hello, so as the title says, I’m about to buy a new console, and I’m stuck between the Behringer X32 and the Soundcraft Si Expression 2. At the…
Source: www.reddit.com
Date Published: 4/8/2021
View: 3042
Soundcraft Impact or Behringer X32 – Gearspace.com
Soundcraft is a better mixer. X32 has more stuff. Let me assure you that assignable fader layer is beautiful. You have access to more useful faders. It’s a much …
Source: gearspace.com
Date Published: 2/26/2021
View: 1610
Behringer X32 vs Soundcraft Si Impact – Review Finder
Experts prefer Behringer X32 over Soundcraft Si Impact … On 3 Jul 2022 (19 days ago) we went through 102 Audio Mixer expert endorsements . Currently, Behringer …
Source: reviewfinder.com
Date Published: 7/16/2021
View: 3037
Behringer x32 vs Soundcraft SI Performer 2
The Soundcraft has “fixed” latency. While the “B” does not. As you add channels, eq, comps ect it slows down the signal flow which can adversely …
Source: forums.prosoundweb.com
Date Published: 5/28/2022
View: 7759
Soundcraft expression 3 vs behringer x32 manual – Peatix
yamaha tf3 vs behringer x32 presonus studiolive 32 series iii vs behringer x32 mas m32 vs soundcraft si expression 3 soundcraft vs massoundcraft vs …
Source: peatix.com
Date Published: 5/28/2021
View: 8453
Behringer X32 vs. Presonus SL vs. Soundcraft SI Expression …
These digital mixers are getting close to being affordable. Soundcraft Si Expression 1 versus Behringer X32 Producer looks comparable at least …
Source: talk.philmusic.com
Date Published: 2/3/2022
View: 9631
Comparison of Digital boards for small to medium sized …
We compare the Behringer X32, Mas M32, Allen and Heath SQ-5 and SQ-6, Soundcraft SI Performer, and Presonus Series III consoles.
Source: gator4076-trentp-primary.cluster2.hgsitebuilder.com
Date Published: 9/29/2022
View: 3655
Berry x32 vs Souncraft Xpression 2 – Forum – Speakerplans.com
The Soundcraft Si Expression 2 and the berry x32 with the relevant digital stage boxes, are the two that are being debated over.
Source: forum.speakerplans.com
Date Published: 12/8/2021
View: 2283
Sujet Vs soundcraft si expression – X32 Standard – Audiofanzine
Vs soundcraft si expression : Behringer X32 Standard. … Donc, finalement, pour le prix d’une SI Exp 3, je me suis offert la X32 compact avec 2 stage box.
Source: fr.audiofanzine.com
Date Published: 3/26/2022
View: 7960
주제와 관련된 이미지 soundcraft si expression vs behringer x32
주제와 관련된 더 많은 사진을 참조하십시오 Digital Mixers: A Hands On Comparison of Behringer Soundcraft PreSonus and Roland. 댓글에서 더 많은 관련 이미지를 보거나 필요한 경우 더 많은 관련 기사를 볼 수 있습니다.
주제에 대한 기사 평가 soundcraft si expression vs behringer x32
- Author: SonicSenseProAudio
- Views: 조회수 140,945회
- Likes: 좋아요 537개
- Date Published: 2013. 8. 27.
- Video Url link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaK-yaGB0BA
Soundcraft Impact or Behringer X32
Quote: benxiwf ➡️ Originally Posted by I’ve got to say I’ve spent some time on both of these boards as well as the A and H Qu series and I think that the Soundcraft is the best all around option. Since we are comparing the Soundcraft and Behringer, I will say that the main reasons I greatly prefer the Soundcraft are:
– Better routing flexibility. Our theater layout pretty much necessitates the use of two stageboxes and the Impact allows this with no analog snake.
Quote: – Better layout flexibility – Any fader can be anywhere! That’s a good thing and means things like the snapshots described above where you want to add a single mic to a cue without effecting anything else can be easily done by just adding that mic the old fashioned way – pushing the on button. If that person’s fader is on a hidden layer, just move it to the top fader wherever is most convenient for that cue. You can also isolate whatever components you want in a cue so you do have a lot of flexibility here.
Quote: – I also recently have enjoyed using Waves multirack and/or Live Professor for running plugins. This makes up for things like transient designers and multicomp which are nice. AFAIK on the Behringer you can only place plugin inserts like this on individual tracks and not mix groups/mains which you can on the Soundcraft. Correct me if I’m wrong on this.
Quote: -Total hardware channel strip. It is really nice not to have to go through any banks when adjusting eq/comp/gate/hpf/gain. Everything has a knob.
Quote: -More robust. I just think it feels a lot better and sturdier even though it isn’t quite a tank itself.
Quote: I just find the Soundcraft to be a more robust and powerful board where it counts! I have been happily using the Si series in the theater I mainly mix in for the past 5 years (Expression 3 for 4 years and now the Impact) and have found it to be great for musicals (and everything else but that is the largest scale thing we do)
The X32 can handle multiple stage boxes. Any scene can access any number of stage boxes. The only advantage Soundcraft has is the ability to assign inputs in any order from any block of inputs. Behringer can only access blocks of 8. Once you have switched to a block of 8 (either a local block, or a stage box) you can assign any fader to any input in any order. I’ll agree that the Soundcraft approach is slightly more flexible, but only slightly so IMO.Seems like you have quite a bit more experience with the Soundcraft than you do on the X32. The advantage that the Soundcraft has is the ability to define a “custom layer” on the console. I agree that this is nice; however, one could simply do the same thing using a scene on the X32. Adding a single mic would be as easy as using a snipit on the X32. In fact, snipits can do a great deal more than that in a single button press.I think that most of us would prefer that the console have the tools built into it that we needed to run the show (at least I would). Using external equipment on a digital mixer seems …. like going back in time to an analog mixer doesn’t it?You are also incorrect. The X32 can put an insert on any bus. Further, the insert point can be configured to pre-eq, or post-eq (and dynamics btw).Not “total” btw, but certainly the channel PEQ knobs are much nicer on the Soundcraft. Not every control has a dedicated knob on the Soundcraft. In fact, most of the more detailed parameters for various functions require menus to be accessed to adjust them on the touch screen.Possibly so… at least from a feel standpoint. I would say that the X32 has a pretty good reliability in the field. Most would say it has done better than the Soundcraft Si boards.Well, I would say that the Impact is better than the Expression simply due to the LCD scribble strips; however, that still doesn’t compensate the overall package enough to overcome the detailed scene and snipit capabilities inside the X32 IMO. The X32 has really gone out of its way to be a good mixer for theater IMO.I do agree that the Impact is a fine mixer though. You can certainly make it work for Theater.
Behringer X32 vs Soundcraft Si Impact: Review & Full Comparison
On 3 Jul 2022 (24 days ago) we went through 102 Audio Mixer expert endorsements .
Currently, Behringer X32 received 1 endorsement from Music Critic (23 Feb 2022). Meanwhile, Soundcraft Si Impact did not receive any endorsements this month.
Rank Change Price Audio Mixer Old Time Music Podcast Insights Vlog Tribe BestCovery Music Critic BestReviews WireRealm Spy Hustlr Music Radar 58 N/A $2499 Behringer X32 – – – – 9 – – – – – N/A N/A $3095 Soundcraft Si Impact – – – – – – – – – –
Curious to see this month’s entire Audio Mixers ranking? It’s here
About our ranking methodology
TLDR: We read top 10 ‘Best audio mixers’ articles on the Internet, and combine all the recommendations into one mega-list. The more recommendations a product has, the higher it ranks. Step 1: identify experts. Robots determine most respectable sources on the Internet, then the team manually chooses the best ones.
Robots determine most respectable sources on the Internet, then the team manually chooses the best ones. Step 2: import experts’ rankings. Robots try to import the rankings that experts independently publish. Since robots inevitably mess up, team manually checks the data.
Robots try to import the rankings that experts independently publish. Since robots inevitably mess up, team manually checks the data. Step 3: exclude unrelated products. In their creative wisdom, experts often tend to include accessories or alternatives in their ranking. Our team has to manually exclude products that don’t match product category.
In their creative wisdom, experts often tend to include accessories or alternatives in their ranking. Our team has to manually exclude products that don’t match product category. Step 4: determine if experts are endorsing the same product. For variations of the same products our team needs to determine whether the products are the same or not (is iPhone 13 64GB and iPhone 13 128GB the same model or not?)
For variations of the same products our team needs to determine whether the products are the same or not (is iPhone 13 64GB and iPhone 13 128GB the same model or not?) Step 4: assign weights to expert endorsements and aggregate opinion. Currently we use ranking methodology 0.7.2 : being included in the expert ranking scores points. Being ranked #1 carries a lot more points. Being included in top 3 also carries bonus points. Then the point value of every endorsement is adjusted by a geometric progression with common ratio slightly below 1. In other words, product ranked #1 carries a lot more weight than product ranked #6; product ranked #6 carries slightly more weight than product ranked #8.
Currently we use ranking methodology : being included in the expert ranking scores points. Being ranked #1 carries a lot more points. Being included in top 3 also carries bonus points. Then the point value of every endorsement is adjusted by a geometric progression with common ratio slightly below 1. In other words, product ranked #1 carries a lot more weight than product ranked #6; product ranked #6 carries slightly more weight than product ranked #8. Step 5: add it all up.
Step 6: do it all again in a month. In more detail:
Endorsement summary:
Behringer x32 vs Soundcraft SI Performer 2
They contend in other brands of consoles that as you “engage” comps, gates, eq’s or have more active channels it slows down the signal flow which will effect the sound quality, giving it a more digital sound. Which somebody discribed exactly earlier. The Soundcraft consoles all have a fixed latency no matter how many accessories are engaged. It’s the same for the Vi and Studer boards as well.
AFAIK there are no digital consoles on the market that increase the latency when you engage a channel eq or dynamics processor. Every console I know of is a fixed latency for a given path. Where you get extra latency is in using different path lengths. Input to group to matrix is a longer path than input to matrix. Input to group to stereo to matrix is longer still. Using an insert to add in a processor from an FX rack is longer as well. Adding the eq from the channel strip is not.Some consoles do “delay compensation” which just raises the latency of all paths to the theoretical maximum you get. On a Midas Pro 2 that makes the analog in to analog out about 8ms vs less than 2ms without compensation.In the Studer manual they list the added latency for different processors, so I don’t think it is a fixed latency, and while the new X processors are not off the shelf, the older series used SHARC processors.Mac
Behringer X32 vs. Presonus SL vs. Soundcraft SI Expression Digital Mixers
in my own opinion, this are all good bang for the buck digital mixers to start with.
you’ll never go wrong with this brands, it’s just a matter of choosing which one will fit your budget
and taste.
These are all entry level live digital mixers…on the x32 looks like behringer just hit a jackpot product with good user reviews. One reviewer said that the features on the X32 they should sell it @ $7k and wondering how they manage to sell it @ $3.2k. This move by Behringer is now forcing other manufacturers/brands to price match them. Soundcraft answered it by the SI expression though less in features you might get a better sonic quality and reliabilty of soundcraft…kaso still a hypothesis till the SI comes to our shores. The presonus sl sold well on a lot of pro audio suppliers here and they swear by it..really good hardware for recording live perfomances also.
Comparison of Digital boards for small to medium sized churches
Here are some brief thoughts about several popular digital consoles on the market. It is by no means comprehensive. We have written another article about things to think about when looking for a new board which you can find here. We have started to create much more in-depth reviews for several of the boards mentioned below using those 9 standards. The console title will be hyperlinked to the more detailed reviews when they become available.
All of the boards listed below have moving faders, 8 DCAs (which come in handy when mixing a lot of channels on multiple layers), Mute groups (if muting the DCA isn’t enough for you), significant scene management with instant recall, digital scribble strips, and 16 channel personal monitoring solutions available. With the addition of a router, all of these consoles can be remotely controlled from a tablet. In addition, though only proprietary snakes are addressed below, all of these consoles (except the Presonus) have one or more card slots which can provide access to a wide variety of I/O including USB, DANTE, MADI, and ADAT to mention just a few. Whole Hearted Productions can provide, install, set up and tune any of the consoles listed here, and we would love to help your church continue to improve your worship.
Behringer X32, X32 Compact and X32 Producer
The X32 revolutionized digital mixing at reasonable costs. At $2,000 for the X32 and $1,500 for the X32 Compact, there was no other board that did anything close to what this did for the money when it came out in 2013. We do not recommend the X32 Producer. While it can be rackmounted, it does not have LCD scribble strips which are a serious disadvantage when you are going through 8 layers of fader banks. With moving faders, a 7” color screen, well thought out layout and design and Midas designed preamps, not to mention some serious processing power with 4 band fully parametric EQs, comprehensive compression and gating and a large number of high quality effects, this board has a LOT going for it. Once it is set up (we recommend having someone who knows what they are doing do the initial setup for your church so that you can get the most out of it), this board is pretty easy to use. By using the built AES50 digital snake protocol, you can use this to connect to digital snakes on the stage as well as other X32 family consoles and M32 consoles and snakes (see below), if you need them for separate monitor or video mixing. The newest firmware release eliminates the former requirement to allocate inputs in 8 channel blocks, which greatly increases the flexibility when fully utilizing the AES50 environment.
Midas M32, M32R, M32C
The Midas M32 has the exact same software and basic design as the X32. What sets this apart (aside from its $4,000 price tag for the M32, and $2,500 cost for the M32R) is the design, preamps, and components… and a 10 year warranty (vs. the 3 year warranty on the X32). The M32 has a much more pronounced angle above the faders which makes this easier to see in the sunlight when you are outside and much easier to work with while sitting down inside. In addition, the M32R will fit in a rack (although depending upon your setup, you will want to make sure that your rack lid has enough clearance), but it still has scribble strips (as compared to the aforementioned X32 Producer). The preamps sound “cleaner” than the X32 and if you push them hard they reportedly sound very warm and natural (as compared to breaking up as they do if you push them too hard on an X32). Finally, the components are much higher quality on the M32 to include the buttons and the Million Cycle faders designed by Midas for their touring consoles. The M32C ($1,000) is a single rack space mix engine with all of the processing capabilities of an M32 or X32, but it needs to be connected to a snake or another console (it has no analog I/O), and it needs to be controlled by an iPad (or other tablet). This is a great solution for a monitor mix as you can adjust the EQs independently for the stage without affecting the house. It should also be noted that the Midas DL16 (16×8, $1,250) and DL32 (32×16, $2,000) digital snakes are fully compatible with the X32 and if you are cool with the X32 layout, this may be a way to get the better sounding Midas Preamps and still save some money. The X32 and M32 consoles are fully compatible with each other over daisychainable AES50, so you can mix and match as necessary.
Allen and Heath SQ-6, SQ-5
This brand new mixer (2018) has the potential to be the next new thing. Taking the powerful XCVI processing engine from its much bigger dLive big brother consoles, this little guy operates at 96 kHz (as compared with the X32/M32 48 kHz) and sports less than .7 milliseconds of latency (The X32/M32 have .85 ms latency which is still very good). The SQ6 has a smaller footprint than the X32, but has the same number of sliders as the X32. The difference is that the sliders are not dedicated as they are on the X32. This makes the initial set up a bit more challenging, but can potentially offer significant power by being able to mix DCA sliders with single channel and even FX return faders. With 5 banks of 24 sliders, there are more fader possibilities than there are channels to mix and send. The 7” full color multitouch screen is very useful, but also necessary to the operation of the board (although enough knobs, buttons and faders are provided to enable a tactile experience while mixing). With the addition of I/O boxes, this board can access add up to 32×16 additional ins and outs with the ability to process 40 input channels with 12 STEREO mixbusses (as compared the X32’s 12 mono/6 stereo mixes) with a total of 36 mix buses including 3 stereo matrices (6 mono matrix sends may be enabled in future software releases). And speaking of Monitor Mixes, this board will interface with A&H’s ME-1 personal monitor mixes which vary from the traditional AVIOM model in that each mixer can access 40 outputs from the board independently. 16 channel 96k multitrack recording is available on a surface-mounted USB thumb drive and a full 32×32 96k recording to a DAW can be done over a USB connection on the back of the board. Bottom line, this is a great sounding board with a lot of capabilities! However, he very simple looking user interface is somewhat misleading; however, if you are already a user of A&H digital consoles (QU, GLD, and dLive), you will find this system to be pretty familiar. On the other hand, if you are new to A&H, we recommend getting some help to get this set up initially to optimize the workflow for your congregation. Because of the flexibility, it will take more work than a fixed fader format (such as an X32/M32/StudioLive board) to get it set up in an ideal way for your church. The SQ6 ($3,500) only has 24 preamps (mic inputs) built in with 24+1 faders and the rackmountable SQ5 ($2,800) has 16 mic preamps with 16+faders. Both boards have identical processing capabilities. The board works with older 48 kHz A&H snakes, but if you want to maintain 96 kHz capabilities, you will need a DX series I/O rack (DX168 16×8 stage box is $1,700). This board also has the ability to work with their larger dLive systems for things like video mixing and monitor mixing, which means that this may be a great investment if you think your church will eventually invest in a dLive system.
Soundcraft SI Impact and Performer 1, 2, and 3
The boards boards sound good, have a relatively easy to use interface, and a flexible fader layout (like the SQ series), but it has a painfully small touch screen which is necessary for several functions. Also, it only has 4 FX units built in (which is often enough, but there are no more). On the other hand, it has a 31-band EQ, parametric EQ and compressor on every output bus, and there are a LOT of them available (31 output buses available with additional I/O). These consoles have a ridiculous quantity of Ins and Outs. If the SQ isn’t big enough, but you are not yet ready to graduate to a larger format console, this series may be a serious consideration for you. The SI Impact and Performer series give you 80 channels to mix and with additional snakes, up to 128 inputs and 96 outputs are available, effectively putting you in a league with some significantly more expensive consoles. In addition, these boards have up to 20 subgroups/aux buses which can be assigned in stereo to a single fader and sent to any of the available outputs. Even so, the board still sports less than 1ms latency at 48 kHz. Again, it is well worth your investment to have someone set this up for you so that you can get the most out of your board. You might look at the less expensive SI Expression boards, but the Expressions don’t have scribble strips; multiple fader banks without a scribble strip is a painful experience, and we strongly recommend that you look for consoles with digital scribble strips whenever possible. The security features on these boards are significant, and if that is a concern at your church, this might be an important consideration. The Performer Series have 8 1/4″ line inputs and and all four boards have 16 XLR outputs on the back. The SI Impact ($2,300) is only available in one size with 32 mic inputs (eight of which are 1/4″ xlr combi-jacks) and 24+2 faders. Unlike the Performer Series, it does not have DMX capabilities (which typically aren’t used on a soundboard anyway despite how cool the idea sounds). In our opinion, this is by far the best value in the series. The rackmountable SI Performer 1 ($3,800) has 16 mic preamps and 16+2 faders, the SI Performer 2 ($4,852) has 24 mic preamps and 24+2 faders and the SI Performer 3 ($6,068) has 32 mic Preamps and 32+2 faders.
Presonus StudioLive III 16, 24, and 32
The first digital board owned by Whole Hearted Productions was a Presonus StudioLive 16.4.2. When it debuted, it was the coolest thing on the market that was anywhere close to affordable. When the X32 came out, we quickly upgraded because the X32 had moving faders, scribble strips, DCAs, and a much more useful screen. Presonus held on thanks to its excellent sounding studio quality mic preamps, but it took a big hit from the X32. However, Presonus seriously narrowed the gap and in many ways, surpassed the X32 when they finally came out with the new III series (they would probably be insulted that the two boards are even compared with each other). In fact, The Series III was named the 2018 “Best New Live Sound Product” by Sound on Sound. Their new consoles have a color touch screen, moving faders, scribble strips, and multiple ways to set up the board. They have a whopping 24 DCAs, but only 8 of them are available at a time unless you utilize the custom “User” layer. They use a nearly proprietary network protocol called AVB which provides access to 16×8 and 8×8 stage boxes and (new in 2018) IEM monitoring solutions. Utilizing the stage boxes, the board can access up to an additional 56 channels. It should be noted however, that this does NOT work well with previous mixers or other gear using AVB prior to the Series III. Where this board really shines is that it is fully integrated with the included Presonus Digital Audio Workstation (DAW) software called StudioOne Pro, which is quickly becoming recognized as one of the top DAWs available. We still find the user interface to be a bit clunky and non-intuitive for live sound (which admittedly may simply be due to limited experience), but many users find them very easy to use as live boards. Because there are as many faders as there are inputs, you can mix an entire show (including monitors) without ever leaving the main fader layer. and are reportedly very easy to use as Monitor Boards (similar to the QU boards). Unlike all of the other boards reviewed here, the StudioLive does not have the capability to interface with other networked technologies with an optional card, and thus when it comes to digital gear, your are fully buying into Presonus. Under the hood, all three boards are 32×16 channel mixers if you use additional stage boxes. If you use these in conjunction with the 32R ($1,400 rackmounted version of the board with no user interface) in Monitor mix mode, you can have up to 32 Flexmix outputs when you use the outputs on both the console and the 32R. The 32 ($3,000) has 33 faders, 32 mic preamps, a total of 40 channels to mix and 16 FlexMix outputs. The 24 ($2,500) has 25 faders, 24 mic preamps, a total of 32 channels to mix and 16 FlexMix outputs. The rackmountable 16 ($2,000) has 17 faders, 16 mic preamps, a total of 22 channels to mix and only 10 FlexMix outputs.
Bottom Line
We are still huge fans of the X32/M32 paradigm for its ease of use and number of preamps for the money. On the other hand, if you can afford them, the SQ-5 and SQ-6 are some of the most powerful boards in this category, and frankly, some of the only 96 kHz consoles in this class; but remember, additional I/O is relatively expensive. If a sheer number of channels to process in and out is a concern for you, the SI Impact and Performer consoles are the clear winners here. The jump to pro level consoles with that kind of channel count is typically well above the price point for a SI Performer (and WAY above the cost of an Impact!). With that said, if you don’t need that many ins and outs, we find the tiny touch screen to be less than optimal. Finally, the Presonus StudioLive Series III consoles are light years ahead of the previous StudioLive boards, and have great sounding preamps. While we personally are not yet a fan, you owe it to yourself to at least consider this console. In conjunction with the 32R, you have the potential for more outputs than even the Soundcraft SI series. With that said, before buying ANY console, carefully think about the cost of additional Ins and outs (I/O). That may not be a huge deal when using your current analog snake when you are converting from your analog board, but you will want to count the cost, capabilities, and flexibility up front when you think about future needs for additional inputs and outputs.
As you can see, there is a place for everything! We recommend working with a consultant that can help you figure out what will be best in your actual situation.
Stay tuned for a similar comparison of some larger format consoles.
Berry x32 vs Souncraft Xpression 2
As the title says, anyone with hands on experience with both desks place your feedback here. I look after a small venue in town and they are looking to go digital on a budget. The Soundcraft Si Expression 2 and the berry x32 with the relevant digital stage boxes, are the two that are being debated over. Yes I know the x32 has 32 preamps but the venue is happy to have just the 24 and the fact you can xpand the expression 2 with the mini stagebox 32 + Madi cards is a big plus. I really like the look of the Expression range, but would like to hear the thoughts of peoples first hand experience on both desks.. Is the hype of the berry acurate. Cheers Jim
I have an X32 and an Si Ex 3, they’re quite different beasts. The Si Ex range sounds very nice and is more or less an LS9 that isn’t horrific to use. It’s very quick to move around and throw a mix down on, but you might find the EQ section limited (HPF, LPF and two selectable notches with a Q that doesn’t quite go high enough for my liking).
The X32 is fully bells and whistles, especially as they can use it as a multitrack soundcard, but the interface is a lot more confusing to use for a first timer, the fixed DCA/bus section can be a pain when working with a large number of channels, and it does seem to have a few minor bugs still in place. Oh and the VU is stupid, half green, half bright orange, and it’s a fine line between having enough output and it suddenly sounding like a fart in a wet paper bag.
The Si Ex also has an AES input, which the Berry surprisingly lacks – might not sound like much but if they’re doing DJ stuff and have Pioneer front end, it makes a massive difference in sound quality and not having to worry so much about the DJ being able to rag the arse off the system.
Personally if I had to do a full show on my lonesome tomorrow I’d probably take the X32 as it has more features, but I find myself drawn more and more to the Soundcraft. Oh and if you know where to look, the Si Ex 3 with mini stagebox can be had for not much more than an X32 with 2 S16 boxes…
Edited by toastyghost – 12 September 2013 at 4:25pm
Vs soundcraft si expression
Je me suis retrouvé dans la situation ou j’hésitais entre ces 2 consoles.
Outre les points évoqués, c’est surtout l’ergonomie de la X32 qui m’a réellement convaincu. L’application IPAD de la SI expr est archaique, et ne donne pas beaucoup de satisfaction.
Donc, finalement, pour le prix d’une SI Exp 3, je me suis offert la X32 compact avec 2 stage box. Et je n’ai pas encore trouvé d’argument me faisant regretter ce choix.
키워드에 대한 정보 soundcraft si expression vs behringer x32
다음은 Bing에서 soundcraft si expression vs behringer x32 주제에 대한 검색 결과입니다. 필요한 경우 더 읽을 수 있습니다.
이 기사는 인터넷의 다양한 출처에서 편집되었습니다. 이 기사가 유용했기를 바랍니다. 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오. 매우 감사합니다!
사람들이 주제에 대해 자주 검색하는 키워드 Digital Mixers: A Hands On Comparison of Behringer Soundcraft PreSonus and Roland
- Pro Audio
- Sonic Sense
- Behringer
- X32
- Soundcraft
- Si Expression
- PreSonus
- StudioLive
- Roland
- m200i
- Digital Mixer
- Live
- Sound Reinforcement
- Console
- Mixing Board
- Mixing Console
- Mixer
Digital #Mixers: #A #Hands #On #Comparison #of #Behringer #Soundcraft #PreSonus #and #Roland
YouTube에서 soundcraft si expression vs behringer x32 주제의 다른 동영상 보기
주제에 대한 기사를 시청해 주셔서 감사합니다 Digital Mixers: A Hands On Comparison of Behringer Soundcraft PreSonus and Roland | soundcraft si expression vs behringer x32, 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오, 매우 감사합니다.
