당신은 주제를 찾고 있습니까 “qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent – WingsofRedemption (Jordie Jordan) is actually Leeroy Jenkins“? 다음 카테고리의 웹사이트 https://chewathai27.com/you 에서 귀하의 모든 질문에 답변해 드립니다: https://chewathai27.com/you/blog. 바로 아래에서 답을 찾을 수 있습니다. 작성자 Lalo Salamanca 이(가) 작성한 기사에는 조회수 285회 및 좋아요 13개 개의 좋아요가 있습니다.
Table of Contents
qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent 주제에 대한 동영상 보기
여기에서 이 주제에 대한 비디오를 시청하십시오. 주의 깊게 살펴보고 읽고 있는 내용에 대한 피드백을 제공하세요!
d여기에서 WingsofRedemption (Jordie Jordan) is actually Leeroy Jenkins – qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent 주제에 대한 세부정보를 참조하세요
Those poor teammates. \”Qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent\” as they say.
Shoutout to the real trolls… GulagKingpin, Fatman, Ricardo, RIP Chocolate Thunder, fat gutz and the rest. Lummox is a paypig. Big ups to Richard’s chair for holding it down.
#WingsofRedemption
qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent 주제에 대한 자세한 내용은 여기를 참조하세요.
Wikipedia:If you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas
If you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas, or in Latin, qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent. “He that lieth down with dogs shall rise up …
Source: en.wikipedia.org
Date Published: 1/21/2022
View: 6657
Qui cum canibus concumbunt cum… – Michael’s Shaves
“Qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent” (“For they that sleep with dogs, shall rise with fleas.”) – English translation by John …
Source: www.facebook.com
Date Published: 6/13/2021
View: 1318
Why do we say If you lie down with dogs, you’ll get up with fleas?
The Latin variant is, “qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent” (they who lie with dogs will rise with fleas). Sanford dedicated Garden of Pleasure’s …
Source: www.bookbrowse.com
Date Published: 4/14/2021
View: 409
Qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent
Qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent. by: Peter Pitts |; 09/21/2017. Lay down with dogs, wake up with fleas.
Source: drugwonks.com
Date Published: 9/21/2021
View: 9768
qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent.: Fujifilm …
qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent. In reply to Tim39 • Jun 23, 2011. aka “If you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas.” Tim39 wrote:.
Source: www.dpreview.com
Date Published: 5/7/2022
View: 1174
Proverbs: If You Lie Down with Dogs… – In Other Words
As with all ancient proverbs, it has a Latin variant, which says- “qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent” (they who lie with dogs …
Source: inotherwords.ac
Date Published: 7/24/2022
View: 9616
주제와 관련된 이미지 qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent
주제와 관련된 더 많은 사진을 참조하십시오 WingsofRedemption (Jordie Jordan) is actually Leeroy Jenkins. 댓글에서 더 많은 관련 이미지를 보거나 필요한 경우 더 많은 관련 기사를 볼 수 있습니다.
주제에 대한 기사 평가 qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent
- Author: Lalo Salamanca
- Views: 조회수 285회
- Likes: 좋아요 13개
- Date Published: 2020. 7. 16.
- Video Url link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCSYpDX3AaI
Wikipedia:If you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas
Essay on editing Wikipedia
If you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas, or in Latin, qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent. “He that lieth down with dogs shall rise up with fleas” has been attributed to Benjamin Franklin’s Poor Richard’s Almanack.[1][2] The Latin has been unreliably attributed to Seneca[3][4], but not linked to any specific work.
An earlier English reference was first cited in 1612 by John Webster in his play “The White Devil.” Act five, scene one, line 170: “For they that sleep with dogs, shall rise with fleas.”
The quote has a large almost universally agreed meaning of “You should be cautious of the company you keep. Associating with those of low reputation may not only lower your own but also lead you astray by the faulty assumptions, premises and data of the unscrupulous.”
Why do we say “If you lie down with dogs, you’ll get up with fleas”?
If you lie down with dogs, you’ll get up with fleas
Meaning:
If you associate with disreputable characters your own reputation will inevitably be harmed.
Background:
This proverb is first recorded in English in James Sanford’s Garden of Pleasure (1573): He that goeth to bedde wyth Dogges, aryseth with fleas.
It seems that little is known of Sanford (sometimes recorded as Sandford) other than that he was an English author and translator of various Latin texts. The Latin variant is, “qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent” (they who lie with dogs will rise with fleas).
Sanford dedicated Garden of Pleasure’s to Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester, a long-time favorite of Elizabeth I. According to its opening pages, it “contayninge most pleasante tales, worthy deeds and witty sayings of noble princes [et] learned philosophers, moralized. No lesse delectable, than profitable. Done out of Italian into English…”
Alphabetical list of expressions
Challenge yourself with BookBrowse Wordplays
Qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent | Drugwonks
Lay down with dogs, wake up with fleas.
Now replace “dogs” with Prescription Benefit Managers” and “fleas” with lawsuits and you’ve got a pretty good idea of what’s driving the Pfizer/Johnson & Johnson story. But there’s more to it than money.
Really.
In brief, Pfizer has filed a complaint against Johnson & Johnson, claiming J&J was taking anticompetitive steps to block the sale of Pfizer’s drug Inflectra.
(Inflectra is Pfizer’s version of J&J’s blockbuster drug Remicade — which treats autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn’s disease. Approved in 1998, it generated $4.8 billion in sales for J&J. Pfizer and its partner Celltrion got its biosimilar version of Remicade, called Inflectra, approved in April 2016. The two drugs are both versions of infliximab.)
At launch, Pfizer priced Inflectra at a 15% discount to Remicade’s list price of $1,113 a vial. That’s the idea behind biosimilars right, safety, efficacy – and competition to drive down costs. Keep reading.
Per Pfizer’s lawsuit, Remicade still retains 96% of the market. Pfizer’s assertion is that’s because of contracts between J&J and health insurers that require Remicade — as opposed to Inflectra — to be used first before trying other treatments for new patients.
Anti-competitive? That’s for the court to decide. But should insurers be able to block patient access for profit-driven purposes– by contract? Optimizing best practice is one thing. Venality is something else.
Wait, it gets worse. As part of the J&J contract, insurers had to commit to not reimbursing for Inflectra. And since insurers won’t cover Inflectra, hospitals (according to Pfizer) don’t want to keep it in stock.
Anti-competitive? Per Pfizer, “… due to J&J’s exclusionary conduct, competition has been foreclosed. J&J maintains its monopoly and has continued to capture over 96 percent of infliximab sales even while maintaining prices far above competitive levels.”
Inflectra originally came out at 15% discount to Remicade but Pfizer has cut the price as the market has changed. A Pfizer spokesman said last week that the product is now priced at a 35% discount to Remicade’s wholesale acquisition cost. Also the Average Sales Price (ASP –the net price) for Inflectra and Remicade are trending in opposite directions, since launch of Inflectra ASP for Remicade has gone up while ASP for Inflectra is trending down.
As we debate drug pricing, consider this, CMS could save $140 million annually if most of their eligible patients used Inflectra rather than Remicade. It’s important to note that Inflectra has been not been approved as interchangeable with Remicade, but it does not mean (in a regulatory sense) that one product is in any way superior (in a therapeutic sense) to the other. So, why are payers so willing to block the less expensive, clinically equivalent product for new patients? The answer seems to be … because insurers can make more money by effectively maintaining a Remicade monopoly.
Is an insurer-driven monopoly good for patients? Will it lower the co-pay or co-insurance for a single patient? Sadly, these are rhetorical questions.
Is it sounding anti-competitive yet? What about anti-patient? At a time when we are debating both the price and the value of medicines, what’s wrong with this picture?
Here’s what Dominic Caruso, Johnson & Johnson’s Chief Financial Officer said at the Morgan Stanley Healthcare Conference on September 13th:
“ … relatively speaking, the economic incentive is small because the biosimilars … indicated 35% off list. And with Remicade being in the market already for many, many, many years, the way rebates go in the pharmaceutical market, we’re already there.”
But, in terms of “doing the right thing,” is “there” where we really want to be?
J&J’s response to the Pfizer lawsuit, “We are effectively competing on value and price and to date.”
But how do you “compete” if you don’t allow the other team on the field?
At the end of the day, the most important question is, will this lawsuit help or hurt patients? In the long term it will help if it reveals the venality of a rebate-driven reimbursement system. That way we can aggressively (and a lot more honestly) commence the conversation about pricing medicines based on real world value.
Oyez, Oyez.
Proverbs: If You Lie Down with Dogs…
Spanish novelist Miguel de Cervantes (1547-1616) is credited with saying that ‘a proverb is a short sentence based on long experience’. Proverbs are often centuries old, providing us with global wisdom’s that have remained relevant throughout time.
“If you lie down with dogs, you will get up with fleas.”
One of the earliest records of this saying in English, appears in James Sanford’s Garden of Pleasure, 1573- “He that goeth to bedde wyth Dogges, aryseth with fleas.” It has consistently appeared in literature and proverb collections down the centuries. As with all ancient proverbs, it has a Latin variant, which says- “qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent” (they who lie with dogs will rise with fleas).
Put simply, this proverb is a caution to be careful of the company you keep.
In general, we tend to group people together. So, if you associate with people of ill-repute, you can expect to be held in the same esteem- or lack of. Because we tend to group people together, we presume that associates condone each other’s behaviour and share values and attributes. In doing this, we can make some fairly critical assumptions about someone’s character, based solely on who they hang around with.
We’ve gathered that we shouldn’t befriend any gun-slinging bandits or crafty crooks.
The transgressions of our friends needn’t be so blatant however. The habits of those we surround ourselves with rub off on us, whether they be positive or negative. If we surround ourselves with negative people, it’s hard to see how we would keep up a bright positive demeanour. If we surround ourselves with high achieving, productive people, it would make sense that we would copy that behaviour. A standard is set, and we will meet it- whether it be high or low.
Delving a bit further, this proverb warns us to be weary of what behaviour we choose to engage with.
Let’s say that somebody is acting vindictively towards us. They are clearly acting and speaking from a place of embitterment and malice. We respond to this treatment in kind, exponentially prolonging and increasing the negative feelings and behaviour. In taking the bait, we are participating in their game. To ‘get up with fleas’ conjures a severe image, suggesting infection, contamination and rot. That is exactly what happens when we engage in hateful, spiteful, tit for tat. We meet them down in the dregs, instead of remaining on our own path. Our own character suffers by taking part.
This proverb warns us to be mindful of who we surround ourselves with, and what kind of behaviour we engage with.
We are heavily influenced by our peers and our interactions. It’s vital that they serve us, and we them, in a positive, productive way.
Gloom to Boom: How Leaders Transform Risk into Resilience and Value
0 Bài đánh giá Google không xác minh bài đánh giá nhưng có kiểm tra để tìm nội dung giả và xoá nội dung đó khi tìm thấy Viết bài đánh giá
Gloom to Boom: How Leaders Transform Risk into Resilience and Value Bởi Andrea Bonime-Blanc
키워드에 대한 정보 qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent
다음은 Bing에서 qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent 주제에 대한 검색 결과입니다. 필요한 경우 더 읽을 수 있습니다.
이 기사는 인터넷의 다양한 출처에서 편집되었습니다. 이 기사가 유용했기를 바랍니다. 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오. 매우 감사합니다!
사람들이 주제에 대해 자주 검색하는 키워드 WingsofRedemption (Jordie Jordan) is actually Leeroy Jenkins
- WingsofRedemption
- Jordie Jordan
- WOR
- COD
- Warzone
WingsofRedemption #(Jordie #Jordan) #is #actually #Leeroy #Jenkins
YouTube에서 qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent 주제의 다른 동영상 보기
주제에 대한 기사를 시청해 주셔서 감사합니다 WingsofRedemption (Jordie Jordan) is actually Leeroy Jenkins | qui cum canibus concumbunt cum pulicibus surgent, 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오, 매우 감사합니다.
