Top 36 How Fast Does A Ninja 250R Go 3141 Votes This Answer

You are looking for information, articles, knowledge about the topic nail salons open on sunday near me how fast does a ninja 250r go on Google, you do not find the information you need! Here are the best content compiled and compiled by the https://chewathai27.com team, along with other related topics such as: how fast does a ninja 250r go ninja 250r top speed km/h, ninja 250 0 to 60, ninja 250 hp, ninja 250r for sale, ninja 250r specs, ninja 250 price, ninja 250 weight, ninja 250 top speed 2021

It is estimated that a 250cc bike can attain maximum speeds at 85mph (137 km/h) up to 90mph (145 km/h)easily which is more than enough to travel on highways. You can cruise along and catch up with traffic faster.Kawasaki Ninja 250 | Sport Motorcycle | Smooth & Agile.

Top speed & performance
Max torque	15.2 ft-lb
Top speed	110 mph
1/4 mile acceleration	14.5 secs
Tank range	170 miles

1986–1987 (EX250-E)

EX-250-E Specifications
Engine
Quarter mile	15.4 s @ 87.82 mph (141.33 km/h)
Maximum speed	94 mph (151 km/h)
Maximum power	27.9 kW (37.4 hp) @ 11,000 rpm (Australia: 29.4 kW (39.4 hp) @ 12,500 rpm)

Kawasaki Ninja 300

Manufacturer	Kawasaki
Engine	296 cc (18.1 cu in) liquid-cooled 4-stroke 8-valve DOHC parallel-twin
Bore / stroke	62.0 mm × 49 mm (2.44 in × 1.93 in)
Compression ratio	10.6:1
Top speed	171–192 km/h (106–119 mph)

Contents

How fast does a 250cc street bike go?

How much HP does a Ninja 250R have?

1986–1987 (EX250-E)

EX-250-E Specifications
Engine
Quarter mile	15.4 s @ 87.82 mph (141.33 km/h)
Maximum speed	94 mph (151 km/h)
Maximum power	27.9 kW (37.4 hp) @ 11,000 rpm (Australia: 29.4 kW (39.4 hp) @ 12,500 rpm)

Is the Ninja 250 a sport bike?

Kawasaki Ninja 250 | Sport Motorcycle | Smooth & Agile.

How fast does a 300 cc Ninja go?

Kawasaki Ninja 300

Manufacturer	Kawasaki
Engine	296 cc (18.1 cu in) liquid-cooled 4-stroke 8-valve DOHC parallel-twin
Bore / stroke	62.0 mm × 49 mm (2.44 in × 1.93 in)
Compression ratio	10.6:1
Top speed	171–192 km/h (106–119 mph)

Can a motorcycle go 300 mph?

No one in history has ever put down faster back-to-back runs sitting on a motorcycle. And at the same time, he became the first person to break the 300-mph mark in an FIM sanctioned meet, going 304.969 mph on one run.

Can a motorcycle go 200 mph?

Damon Motorcycles Hypersport Premier: 200 mph

It’s also the bike’s claimed top speed.

Is the Ninja 250 fast?

The 250R can hit 60mph in 5.75 seconds, which is just as fast as the the 2002 Subaru ImprezaWRX which can hit 60mph in 5.7 seconds. Although I don’t recommend drag racing, this little ninja is no slouch!

How much is a Ninja 250 worth?

Values

	Suggested List Price	Average Retail
Base Price	$4,449	$3,190
Options (Add)
Total Price	$4,449	$3,190

How fast is a 2012 Kawasaki Ninja 250R?

Kawasaki Ninja 250R | Acceleration and Top Speed

Kawasaki Ninja 250R Acceleration
Speed	Time
SS/KM	30.60 @ 94 mph
SS/Mile	44.71 @ 97.5mph
Top Speed	97.56 mph

Is Ninja 250R a good bike?

Reliability & build quality. Good marks here because the Kawasaki Ninja 250R is a good motorcycle – it works perfectly as a motorcycle, and works better as bike to gain confidence on.

Is a 250 a good starter bike?

As we’ve mentioned, 250cc motorcycles are excellent starter options, and plenty of people within a year will decide to try out biking. So long as you keep your bike in top shape, it shouldn’t take long to negotiate with a buyer.

How much is a Kawasaki 250?

2022 Kawasaki KX 250 • $8,399

The KX™250 motorcycle is the championship-proven machine built so you can ‘be next’. Be the next champion. Be the next hero.

How fast can a 1000cc Kawasaki Ninja go?

Kawasaki Ninja 1000

Manufacturer	Kawasaki Motorcycle & Engine Company
Class	Sport touring
Engine	1,043 cc (63.6 cu in) liquid-cooled 4-stroke 16-valve DOHC inline-four
Bore / stroke	77.0 mm × 56.0 mm (3.03 in × 2.20 in)
Top speed	152.8 mph (245.9 km/h)

How Fast Is Ninja 400?

Suzuki TL1000R Top Speed & Acceleration

Kawasaki Ninja 400 Acceleration
Speed	Time
SS/KM	25.12/114 mph
SS/Mile	36.73/115 mph
Top Speed	116.7 mph

21 thg 11, 2021

Which is faster R3 or Ninja 300?

Speed: The new Yamaha YZF R3 has a top speed of 180 km/hr. The Kawasaki Ninja 300 has a top speed of 160 km/hr.

Which is the fastest 250 cc bike?

1. Benelli TRK 251 | Starting from: ₹ 2,51,000

Engine Type: 249cc, liquid-cooled, single-cylinder, DOHC.
Mileage: 30-35 kmpl (approx.)
Top Speed: 148 kmph (approx.)
Fuel Tank Capacity: 18 litres.
Kerb Weight: 164 kg.

How fast is 450cc in mph?

Generally, dirt bikes with 450cc engines can reach a top speed of about 90mph. Remember though that reaching this speed will depend on other factors like the terrain.

How fast is 600cc motorcycle?

So how fast are these 600cc bikes? All motorcycle brands have a 600cc motorcycle that will go over 125 mph. Yet, on average, the maximum speed of 600cc bikes is around 160 mph. And some 600cc sports bikes will propel you at a whopping 175 mph!

How fast can a 500cc bike go?

A 500cc single cylinder bike has a top speed of almost 100 mph.

Kawasaki Ninja 250r Top Speed

KAWASAKI NINJA 250R (2008-2011) Review, Specs & Prices | MCN

Article author: www.motorcyclenews.com
Reviews from users: 41899 Ratings
Top rated: 4.8
Lowest rated: 1
Summary of article content: Articles about KAWASAKI NINJA 250R (2008-2011) Review, Specs & Prices | MCN Updating …
Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for KAWASAKI NINJA 250R (2008-2011) Review, Specs & Prices | MCN Updating A brave move by Kawasaki because the Ninja is virtually in a class of its own – MCN reviews the KAWASAKI NINJA 250R, plus specs and owner ratings: Banzai!
Table of Contents:

At a glance

Prices

Overall rating

Ride quality & brakes

Engine

Reliability & build quality

Value vs rivals

Equipment

KAWASAKI NINJA 250R for sale with MCN

Specs

Mpg costs & insurance

Top speed & performance

Model history & versions

Owners’ reviews
for the KAWASAKI NINJA 250R (2008 – 2011)

KAWASAKI NINJA 250R (2008-2011) Review, Specs & Prices | MCN

Article author: www.fodsports.com
Reviews from users: 43853 Ratings
Top rated: 5.0
Lowest rated: 1
Summary of article content: Articles about How Fast Can A 250cc Motorcycle Go? (Data Compare) | Fodsports Blog Updating …
Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for How Fast Can A 250cc Motorcycle Go? (Data Compare) | Fodsports Blog Updating If you are thinking about buying a new dirt bike, you have probably wondered How Fast Can A 250cc Motorcycle Go. How do you calculate this speed
Table of Contents:

250cc Motorcycle Speed Data Compare

Factors that influence the maximum speed of the motorbike

Apollo 250cc Dirt Bike Top Speed Test

Conclusion

FAQs

DON’T MISS OUT!

Buyer Guide

Blog

Helmet Intercom

Article author: en.wikipedia.org
Reviews from users: 19486 Ratings
Top rated: 3.6
Lowest rated: 1
Summary of article content: Articles about Kawasaki Ninja 250R – Wikipedia Updating …
Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for Kawasaki Ninja 250R – Wikipedia Updating
Table of Contents:

Contents

Nomenclature[edit]

Model history[edit]

KAWASAKI NINJA 250R (2008-2011) Review, Specs & Prices

You wouldn’t know it, even looking at the Kawasaki Ninja 250R up real close, but it is manufactured in Taiwan under strict quality control. The gear linkage looks budget but is no worse than other manufacturer budget-line specials. The clocks are olde worlde analogue and there’s even a front wheel driven speedometer cable, which is novel. But the styling and dramatic black or corporate green paintwork is choice and the wave-style brake discs are ultra-cool… on a what is essentially a learner bike.

You could do worse by buying a more powerful machine and getting it restricted especially if it’s a new bike where insurance costs will be horrific. Even a decent private-sale second-hand bike would be expensive and probably lose more money over the next 24 months. Find a Kawasaki Ninja 250 for sale .

Good marks here because the Kawasaki Ninja 250R is a good motorcycle – it works perfectly as a motorcycle, and works better as bike to gain confidence on. MCN’s only worry is what will the Kawasaki Ninja 250R be like after the 24 month probation period; a period of time where the bike will undoubtedly be hammered non-stop and (hopefully not) be treated much the same as a cheapy 125cc learner machine.

A major overhaul of the old, forgotten about ZZ-R/GPX 250 engine has bought Kawasaki Ninja 250R bang up date by being environmentally friendly and as easy to use as a Raleigh bicycle. The Kawasaki Ninja 250R’s claimed 33bhp is spread thinner than gold plating – there’s no sensation of the power coming into play or fading as the motor spins to 14,000rpm so very quickly. Fuel injection does what it does precise and cleanly, which kinda sums up the motor.

The Kawasaki Ninja 250R is a lithesome agile number that makes the most of narrow tyres, high-ish bars and minimalist 154 dry weight figure. It all adds up to make town work and B-road rides a hoot – think slightly more powerful 125cc sports learner motorcycle and you’ll be spot on. The Kawasaki Ninja 250R’s suspension is perfectly suited to all but the worst of UK roads but lacks any damping adjustment, which is a blow on the rear side because the single rear shock needs more preload to keep the bike from getting all floaty and bottoming out. The standard tyres are for upright city use in our book.

The American market has been a big success for the Kawasaki Ninja 250 range for years and years and… But even the Yanks need a fresh brew every now and then and the Ninja 250R is the latest offering. Fortunately for 33bhp probationary riders in mainland Europe and the UK, we are getting the bike too, complete with emissions compliant fuel injection. A brave move by Kawasaki because the Ninja is virtually in a class of its own. Trend setting? Maybe.

25 owners have reviewed their KAWASAKI NINJA 250R (2008 – 2011) and rated it in a number of areas. Read what they have to say and what they like and dislike about the bike below.

4 out of 5 Banzai! 05 September 2020 by Klink Year: 2008 Annual servicing cost: £150 It’s not bad in isolation. I have an Aprilia Mille RSV 1000 as a proper bike. This Kawasaki is still a motorbike that’s capable of breaking the speed limit. It’s got a similar acceleration as a modern 1.6 car. Keeps up with traffic and gives me a sense of reality. Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5 Excellent brakes let down buy budget rock hard non adjustable suspension. An hour in the saddle is enough for any mortal. The bike is at it’s best on back roads or commuting. It’s capable of doing 70-85 if you are in a hurry but 50-60 is bearable. Engine 4 out of 5 It’s slow to pull away. Novice friendly to a the point of being dangerous pulling on to a busy fast main road. Nothing happens till 6000rpm, picks up at 8000 then the party is over by 12500. You need zero mechanical sympathy. Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5 It’s been through 5 owners in 12 years and done little mileage but looks used and the gearbox is a little slack. The indicator wire’s have been hacked around. I stripped the fairing off and it’s definitely been built on a budget in Thailand under licence for kawasaki and it shows. Value vs rivals 4 out of 5 Tyres are as expensive as my Aprilia RSV’s. Metzlers, £160 fitted to lose wheels. I could get budget for £130 but I prefer a known make. It’s £200 for a service and MOT from a backstreet dealer. After removing the fairing I noticed I could easily do it myself. He’d overtighten the chain so it was hard to move the wheels, the coolant was low and on to of that the tyre was 2008 and cracked and he’d just Mot’d it! Equipment 3 out of 5 You get a fuel light temperature gauge that’s as slow as the acceleration, and that’s it. Buying experience: I bought it for £1450 privately from a desperate dad who’s son was either hiding behind the sofa or at college. I offered £300 less and rode away on it.

4 out of 5 Baby ninja 16 July 2020 by Sean Year: 2010 Annual servicing cost: £100 Great little bike has to be worked though to get the best out of it power is spread through the range and engine braking is strong upgraded from a 125 and pleased so far with it even managed to get a brand new Termignoni silencer for less than 200 notes Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5 Ride feels a bit firm brakes are fine Engine 4 out of 5 Has to be worked to get the best out of it engine braking is good Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5 So far so good bought the bike with 4K on the clock so has hardly been used Value vs rivals 5 out of 5 All good here expecting a decent return fuel Wise as bike is used for a 20 mile commute Equipment 3 out of 5 Analogue clocks only no fuel gauge looks dated Buying experience: Bought privately 1200

5 out of 5 World’s best motorcycle 22 March 2019 by Shadey46 Version: green Year: 2008 Annual servicing cost: £300 Most fun, most miles on the smallest bike I’ve owned in the last 30 years. In reality it’s all the bike you’ll ever need. Not the fastest or best handling, but great fun and cheap to run and you can use 95% of the power 100% of the time. Best mpg: 105 Worst mpg: 45 Average mpg: 77 Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5 Love it easy to chuck about but you had too keep the speed up did 90 mph two up. Engine 5 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5 Head gasket went at 85,000 miles, rear shock went at 48,000 miles. Value vs rivals 5 out of 5 Service by main dealer until end of year 4 at at 38,000 miles, then by me until it head gasket went. Equipment 4 out of 5 Some said the stock tyres were poor, they were okay when warmed up, ended up with avon road riders which were good then move to the small Michelin radial. Buying experience: I bought from the main dealer in Ashton-Under-Lyne; Wilma and Pete. They were great but he could be a little grumpy.

5 out of 5 Does what it’s meant to do 20 July 2018 by Dexter Year: 2010 Having owned this bike from new and for 8 years including travelling to and from work every day (150miles) I can safely safe, this bike is perfect for UK roads. Personally it’s fast enough on A and B roads whilst being very nimble and forgiving. The seat is comfortable. Great on motorways and it holds 70mph easy. Power is there when I want it and engine breaking is good. I have done over 90,000 miles on mine and it’s still sounds new. Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5 Very good on all roads. Engine 5 out of 5 Still going strong after 90,000 miles. Power is always about when needed Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5 The parts last but only annoying part is the price to replace. Value vs rivals 4 out of 5 Parts are expensive even after 8 years Equipment 4 out of 5 Doesn’t have a fuel gauge which is a shame but the fuel light gives a fair bit(done 50miles on it once) Buying experience: From dealer paid under what they asked

3 out of 5 Fun little commuter, if that’s what you’re after. 23 September 2016 by Rogerborg Year: 2010 I bagged this plucky little bike to liven up a urban/sub-urban commute, and it just about delivers in that role. The mini-Ninja is barely enough bike to be fun. It keeps up with traffic, can win some traffic light GPs if you rev the nuts off it and slip the clutch, and feels eager and just a little sporty without scrunching you up or threatening to highside or lose the rear on every bend exit. Worth a look if you fancy downgrading, but it’s likely to disappoint most riders with an A2 or A license obtained on a 500+. It’s also not quite as light or as chuckable as you might imagine, coming in at 170kg+ wet. For once, MCN gets it right: “slightly more powerful 125cc sports learner motorcycle,” is a decent description. There are much more capable bikes available, but if you want the involvement of a bike that needs to be actively ridden in order to make progress, it’s worth a look, particularly as a 2nd or 3rd bike. Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5 The ride is reasonable but it won’t thank you for hitting potholes. It’ll lean as far as you’re prepared to trust the tyres. Brakes are decent enough, but nothing remarkable and ABS was never an option. The seat is sports-firm and benefits from throwing a pad or sheepskin over it for anything longer than a half hour ride. The riding position is decent, not as cramped as a sportsbike, or as po-faced as a sit-up naked or “adventure” bike. A nice compromise, much like a GPZ500S. You can use it for motorway runs, but I wouldn’t recommend it. It’s also ropey in cross winds, having a lot of surface area and narrow tyres. Engine 3 out of 5 Decent enough little twin, smooth and eager to rev all the way to the redline – it almost feels like a small IL4. You’ll need to rev it though. Get caught in too high a gear and there’s nothing under your right hand. Even away from the lights you’ll want to slip the clutch in order to get a clean start. Stay in a low gear and batter it and it’ll pick up speed fast enough to stay with traffic, although it’s no rocketship and you won’t be overtaking any but the doziest of Dorrises. This is exactly what I was looking for though: a bike that needs to be actively ridden and delivers its fun at sensible speeds. The clutch is very light and the gearbox nice and snicky. Kawasaki’s “positive neutral finder” is a mixed blessing. Yes, it’ll find neutral easily when you’re looking for it, but it’ll also do it when you’re not unless you’re firm when kicking up to 2nd. One surprise was that 6th gear is perfectly usable at an indicated 30mph. You won’t be accelerating, but neither does it struggle, even on slight inclines. Around town, you’ll probably find yourself revving it out in 2nd then banging it straight up to 6th for a long coast. 3rd is usable, but 4th and 5th gears might as well not be there for road use. Reliability & build quality 3 out of 5 Seems OK so far apart from a slightly leaking fork seal that’s apparently already been replaced. Panel fit is decent, nothing’s rusted or dropped off in 6 years, and it starts on the button every time. No complaints. Value vs rivals 3 out of 5 Not as economical as you might imagine as you need to rev it hard to make progress. I calculate 72mpg on a commute, versus 65 for my F800GS, and over 80 for my Enfield 500. Consumables look to be reasonable and it should be fairly gentle on them. Insurance is cheap, parts are readily available. If you do bin it, plastics are prohibitively expensive, but it streetfighters quite nicely. Value is tricky. These used to be among the best bikes you could ride on the old 25kW/33bhp license, but that’s long since obsolete. It’s a poor fit for the new license categories, and not in demand now, so chisel every penny on price. Dealers are still vastly over-valuing them. Kermit Green is the colour to have. Black ones don’t shift – I bagged my Boring Black bike for under half of what the seller was initially asking, after 6 weeks of him having no interest at all. Equipment 1 out of 5 The absolute bare minimum (short of an Enfield). Two analogue dials, a temperature gauge, a handful of idiot lights… and that’s it. Nothing digital, no fuel gauge, power points, no grab handles, not even a push-to-pass trigger. You can load it with luggage, but only by tying it down to the pillion pegs: there’s literally nothing else on the bike to attach to. The stock fairing mirrors are useless unless you like admiring your elbows. Fortunately, this model comes with bar mounts on the controls, rubber plugged as standard. £10 on a set of universal mirrors transforms the rear visibility, and you can just ditch the stock fairing mirrors.

5 out of 5 IT has fuel injection in Europe 05 October 2014 by Frodeasp Very good handling and fast bike, if you know how to rev it. Is fuel injected in Europe. Have had this bike since 2008 and i like it even Better now than when i bought it. Stable and planted on the road. Much better than my old Yamaha XJ 900. Tolerates wind much better than my old bikes. Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5 Engine 5 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5 Value vs rivals 4 out of 5 Equipment 4 out of 5

4 out of 5 It doesn’t have fuel injection! 21 August 2014 by master256 “Fuel injection does what it does precise and cleanly” It doesn’t have fuel injection it comes with Keihin CVK30 x 2 carburetor. Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5 Engine 4 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5 Value vs rivals 5 out of 5 Equipment 3 out of 5

4 out of 5 It doesn’t have fuel injection! 21 August 2014 by master256 “Fuel injection does what it does precise and cleanly” It doesn’t have fuel injection it comes with Keihin CVK30 x 2 carburetor. Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5 Engine 4 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5 Value vs rivals 5 out of 5 Equipment 3 out of 5

4 out of 5 Ninja Review 06 July 2012 by TwoWheelsMatt A popular choice for most new riders, this is a great motorbike due to its quality build, stylish looks and ease of ride. If you are thinking of advancing onto a bigger sportsbike in the future, this is an ideal motorbike to practice on to improve your confidence. If you are interested in reading my more in-depth review of this motorcycle, then please check out my website at: http://www.besttwowheelreviews.com/kawasaki/ I’ve also got more reviews on motorbikes in the A2 license range from various different manufacturers, contained within the rest of the site. Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5 Engine 3 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5 Value vs rivals 3 out of 5 Equipment 4 out of 5

4 out of 5 motorway 12 June 2011 by flighty hi just got back from a longish motorway ride on my little ninja, not the ideal bike for high speeds on the motorway but will do 70mph all day but sadly my backside will not so had a stop about every couple of hours, overtaking at thease speeds was a slow but my ninja was fully loaded with gear and it coped well for a 250cc bike. Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5 Engine 4 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5 Value vs rivals 4 out of 5 Equipment 2 out of 5

5 out of 5 Fantastic 18 December 2009 by demonjack Ok, where to start…I bought this bike back in October 2007 having waited about two months for my local garage to get stock (typical Japanese delays) and since then I have been nothing but thrilled by it. Having probably had the most experience on this bike out of any other owner (18,000 miles after 14 months…yes 18,000!) I think it’s about time I posted my view. The title of this review pretty much sum up my thoughts, I love the little thing! Having owned a cbr125 and a 650 cruiser before hand it was a bit of an unknown experience jumping on the 250. The 125 was slow and I screamed for more power every time I rode it, and the 650 was heavy and too much of a handful for me (after all, I was only 17). I think the 250 suits me perfectly. The stock tyres really aren’t as bad as people make out, I got my fair share of miles out of the rear (8,000) and had no problem whatsoever. The replacement Bridgestone did feel a whole lot smoother but by then it’s too late to care. As for the front…that’s still on there after 18,000 with plenty of tread. The handling is spot on, I can flick this round bends like anything, and it just wants more. As for the engine…sure it could do with a bit more grunt but if you rev it hard it responds well. I have a full Two Brothers V.A.L.E system with a K&N filter which always helps. If your thinking of getting this pipe (I would recommend it to anyone) just be warned…it is loud…and when I say loud…I mean LOUD! Performance wise…the little one will get to 90 with little fuss, but after that it starts dragging off, I have had 110 out of mine once or twice though. Looks wise I love it. This thing turns heads everywhere I go, if it wasn’t for the 250 badge and tale-tale rear tyre size it would be easily mistaken for a 600. As for reliability I haven’t had any major problems with it even after all those miles. Keeping it serviced every 4,000 does help I’m sure, the only thing that ever needed changing was the rear calliper as the pins had seized, but that didn’t affect me while riding it. I’m trying to rack my brain for bad points…the lack of digital clocks is rather disappointed, but that’s hardly a negative worth picking up on. Other than that you get what you pay for, as 250’s go I’m sure its one of the best out there, sure the price isn’t quite in everyone’s budget but it’s what you’d expect to pay for the quality on offer. As for me I just hope the little thing keeps going, even after 18,000 it still feels like it did the day I took it out of the showroom, and when cleaned up it looks that way too! Fantastic bike, if you’re undecided, buy it! You won’t regret it. Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5 Engine 4 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5 Value vs rivals 4 out of 5 Equipment 4 out of 5

5 out of 5 I like the Ninja 15 December 2009 by ramonpf Very good bike for beginners. Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5 Engine 5 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5 Value vs rivals 5 out of 5 Equipment 4 out of 5

4 out of 5 Nice bike but… 10 November 2009 by Andy949494 After I had my Er6F (unrestricted as I’m an old fogey) for 2 years and 32000 miles I thought I would try to save money by going downsize. In particular since I ride very slowly by bike standards I thought I could save substantially on petrol and tyre costs without suffering from lower performance. The good news is that I am saving – getting over 74mpg even when I thrash it and the current tyres are showing no wear after 2000 miles but I am suffering for that. I wasn’t able to test ride one but had a 250 as a teenager so thought it should be okay – after all my GSX250 was fast in my memories and it only had 27bhp… I really hadn’t realised how slow these bikes are – You can keep up with normal cars driven fairly quickly if you are busy up to 70 or so but acceleration tails off quite quickly above 60 and although 80+ is possible its not very nice. What I’m trying to say is that if you don’t need to ride a restricted bike don’t – Its not very nice and even if you don’t go flat out every-where you would use and enjoy the extra torque of an unrestricted bike every time you took it out. The bike is much faster than a 125 (For comparison I would estimate that the CBR125 works about as hard at 65 as the 250 does at 80) but its just not in the same league as a 600… The engine though is the only negative thing about the bike. I happen to love the way it looks even if its a bit small, its handling is really secure and safe and its brakes are also much better than the ER. The secure way it goes around roundabouts and bends even on damp roads is really confidence boosting – it makes the ER feel vague – its just a shame the engine is so weak. The tyres have been commented about before and they are good for wear but not good in the wet – the rear is prone to skid in the wet if you use the brakes hard – The letgo is just too quick although since the bike is so well balanced it’s not a major stress to me and I will replace the tyres when they are worn. Two last cautions about this bike: 1. No real bikers ever nod at me anymore – its very lonely saving money… 2. My insurance company is quoting me at group 12 which makes it more expensive than the ER6 – Need to change insurers at the end of the year! Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5 Engine 2 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5 Value vs rivals 4 out of 5 Equipment 4 out of 5

5 out of 5 Recommended 19 October 2009 by vivster I’ve waited a while before posting my comment on this bike so that I’ve got a sufficient amount of experience to base any opinions on. I bought my 250R brand new back in April of this year (2009). Since then I’ve done almost 3000 miles on it over 7 months. Most of this is for commuting in and out of central London although I have also taken the bike across Surrey, Berkshire and Kent over the weekends. Having ridden 125s previously this bike is a great way of stepping up. I passed my restricted A2 license in Dec 2008. As someone else has said – its bang on the 33bhp limit so there’s no need to consider any restricter kit as would be the case for a bigger bike which is very convenient. The riding position is quite high for a racer but that’s a good thing since most new riders will want to have the ability to look up and over cars and other vehicles. The narrow profile makes it excellent for filtering through traffic – I generally find myself coping through traffic far more easily than 500/600cc bikes around me. The engine revs very smoothly and is generally forgiving although one is aware that there’s a fair amount of poke should it be needed. Its great for city riding and commuting where you’re never really going to need top end speed. The motorway is the only time I feel the bike is lacking to the point that I’m wishing I was on something bigger. Mechanically, the bike has never given me any troubles. The IRC tyres could be better however I wouldn’t consider changing them unless you’re intending to take the bike onto a track. Otherwise, just wait for them to wear themselves out and replace then. This is great bike to start on and the inexpensive running costs and high residual value mean you can’t go wrong. Definitely recommended – I may even keep this bike when I upgrade to something bigger in a couple of years. Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5 Engine 4 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5 Value vs rivals 5 out of 5 Equipment 5 out of 5

4 out of 5 Great! 06 August 2009 by metbandit1 This bike is amazing i love it! its good fun to ride and great to throw around bends. I dont think the tyres are bad reguardless of what others say..as i can grin the pegs along the floor and the bike still grips and grips! only thing is i wish it had a bit more power…im on a restricted licence but i would love a little more power…(even if i cant) overall an amazing motorcycle! Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5 Engine 3 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5 Value vs rivals 5 out of 5 Equipment 4 out of 5

4 out of 5 Great! 06 August 2009 by metbandit1 This bike is amazing i love it! its good fun to ride and great to throw around bends. I dont think the tyres are bad reguardless of what others say..as i can grin the pegs along the floor and the bike still grips and grips! only thing is i wish it had a bit more power…im on a restricted licence but i would love a little more power…(even if i cant) overall an amazing motorcycle! Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5 Engine 3 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5 Value vs rivals 5 out of 5 Equipment 4 out of 5

4 out of 5 ninja 18 April 2009 by flighty Hi, done over 400miles now, soon be due 1st service, will be changing the tyres then, as others have said the tyres give you no feed back at all, otherwise just love this little bike, in town its spot on for nipping in & out off traffic, very good tank range got 180miles before low fuel light came on. Ride quality & brakes 3 out of 5 Engine 4 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5 Value vs rivals 4 out of 5 Equipment 3 out of 5

4 out of 5 1st day 04 April 2009 by flighty Picked up bike this morning, impossible to keep it under 4000rpm, dealer told me it would be ok to just keep my speed down, and not to over rev it, kept it under 6000rpm most of time, tyres feel ok but only rode it in the dry, after 1st day clocked up 107miles, will know more once i,ve done a few more miles, but so far so good. Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5 Engine 4 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5 Value vs rivals 4 out of 5 Equipment 3 out of 5

5 out of 5 Great bike 09 March 2009 by Waddy24 forgot to add comment about the tyres, they are IRC Roadwinners which come as stock, suggest Bridgestone Battlax BT45’s, as the IRC do feel wooden. Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5 Engine 5 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5 Value vs rivals 5 out of 5 Equipment 4 out of 5

5 out of 5 Great bike 09 March 2009 by Waddy24 With an A2 license its perfect for 2 years for the 33bhp restriction, have been good to follow the break in rules of 4,000 rpm for the 1st 500 miles. I have had the 1st service and now up to 6,000 rpm which has given me up to 65mph till i have done 1000 miles, then i can open her up. It does feel and sound that you are going faster though which adds to the adrenaline. The only complaint is the (R) rear view mirror which does not give a clear back view. Next bike in 2years will be the ER 6F. Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5 Engine 5 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5 Value vs rivals 5 out of 5 Equipment 3 out of 5

4 out of 5 First Day Impressions 27 October 2008 by Mark-S Well after waiting since early May for one of these to turn up I finally paid the balance and got the keys from Metropolis in Vauxhall. First impressions; It’s very green! Second; god it’s tiny. Third; seats a bit hard. Having spent the last twenty two odd years on bigger bikes, VFR750/800’s mostly, this is really a toy to play with. It’s a stage of life thing I guess. I saw it at last years show in Docklands and I was thinking of getting a “back up” scooter but just couldn’t bring myself to do it. This seemed to fit the bill. Right, so, leg over and here we go. Did I mention it’s tiny? I come in at 5’6″ plus change, so it’s a mind thing because it’s not really that small even if it’s the first bike I’ve had where I could have both feet flat on the ground at the same time. Need to get my brain around the new scale of things. On goes the engine first time with a little throttle, all well and good, slip the clutch and up the revs…. hang on where’s the bite? More revs… nope… okay 6000 finally gets me going! Hmm this is going to be interesting since the manual states “Don’t go over 4000 for the first 600 miles”.(?). If anyone who is not a member of the clergy manages 600 miles on one of these without going over 4000 revs I will be amazed. Those 6000 revs in first will get you to a grand old speed of around 15 MPH. So no wheelies away from the lights until it’s run in I guess. It becomes very obvious as I run around the one way system that the Ninja needs lot’s of gear-changing and revs to keep up in the traffic. Here’s the a problem, every single car driver seems to expect me to be able to do 0-60 in a gnat’s tadgers. Isn’t going to happen. The mirrors make everything behind me look like its on my arse… oh! they are!! The mirrors are very nice and give a good view of the traffic bearing down on me as I work my way up the Embankment into Central London. I’ve read most of the reviews and they all condemn the Thai tyres fitted to the Ninja. I don’t think they are as bad as they believe, but then I remember the JapLop tyres that I had on my 250 Superdream back in the mists of time. They were crap even in the dry! These tyres are Ok for around town and straight line work but you will not be getting your knee down with them. Not unless you want it followed by the rest of your body and the bike! Maybe I’ll get them changed at the first service. Despite what this may read like, this bike is fun. After about five miles I’ve got the hang of pulling away from the lights without being run over by the car behind; Lots of revs, only stay in first for as long as it takes you to get your foot under the gear shift, then second very briefly then into third as quickly as you can. Once this thing has all it’s revs available it will be even more fun. I find myself grinning like a loon going across Blackfrairs bridge. Did I mention that this is fun? I get more comments in 30 minutes than I have on any other bike. Unusually they are all polite! “Is that an import?”, “Is that an R6 ?”, (Err no!). Generally it seems to turn the heads of all the scooter boys. Well good, maybe it will encourage them off of their scooters onto a “real” bike. Equally the “Big Boys” give me a sideways glance as they zip past me at what seems like insane speeds. Is that me on the VFR? The brakes are very good. More than enough to pull a stoppy if that is you thing. The tyres are relatively narrow so it feels a little twitchy over the London tarmac but not dangerously so. The engine is very revvy and has a nice whine to it at 6000 that has me grinning again. You can see this 4000 has gone out of the window can’t you? The finish on the bike looks good, although there are a few missing paint flakes around the footrest hangers by the time I finish my first day out. The exhaust can is very chrome and sets the look of the bike off nicely. However the downpipes look like something that should be hanging out off of a gas boiler! They are not going to last. 22mm mild steel I would say. Let’s hope the aftermarket comes out with something to match the standard pipe in a better finish. Dog leg(ish) levers are an easy reach even for small fingers. The clutch action is easy and light but I did manage to get the brake lever all the way to the grip on a couple of occasions before I adjusted my brain to the force actually needed. This bike is quite light after all. By the end of the day I’ve put in 80 odd miles, not a lot I know but I was working as well. I could have doubled that without a doubt and no aching back or numb fingers. The riding position is quite upright for a “sports” bike but I think if you’re over 6″ you might have a different opinion. All in a very enjoyable first day out. Remember A: it’s a 250 not a 600. B: It’s fun just like biking is supposed to be. Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5 Engine 4 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5 Value vs rivals 5 out of 5 Equipment 4 out of 5

5 out of 5 Ninja 250. Its a Beast 16 October 2008 by delvey91 Brilliant Bike. Just past 3500 miles and no problems yet. Really comfortable. I do 40 miles a day, 6 days a week and I can do that on £13 worth of fuel. Exellent bike for new lisence holders. Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5 Engine 5 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5 Value vs rivals 5 out of 5 Equipment 4 out of 5

5 out of 5 Perfecto! 26 July 2008 by kawasakigirl I have owned my Kawasaki Ninja 250 for two months now. With 1000 miles on the clock I am really getting to know who the bike needs me to ride it. I did have a Z750 (which I alsoo adored) but being 5 – 3 I struggled with the shear, on the ground manouvering and tippy toeing in to bike spaces that would only be suitable for a motorcycle. I now have 100% total control over it both on and off which means so much when you are out by yourself. If you really take it through the gears it doesn’t seem like a 250. Not at all. The only thing that lets it down are the tyres. Basically crap but that’s next on the list. I got a can made for it and the hubby improved the braking somewhat by putting on a steel braided hose. I recommend this bike to all the shorty’s out there who want total independence and want to keep up with the bigger bikes. Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5 Engine 5 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5 Value vs rivals 4 out of 5 Equipment 5 out of 5

5 out of 5 Ninja 250 16 June 2008 by thumpa71 All i can say is FAB, Love it Had it for just over a week after waiting to be delivered. Still running her in but no doubt will be having plenty on fab times when the summer decides to rear it’s head. Keep grinning from ear to ear and can’t stop looking at her when tucked up for the night hopeing for another dry day! Mine Black too, shame no other colours to choose from as don’t like the kawasaki green one bit. Other than that ! thanks to kawasaki for giving me the option to upgrade my bike and not have to resort to lowering kits for us short arses. No doubt Honda will be getting their act together soon Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5 Engine 5 out of 5 Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5 Value vs rivals 5 out of 5 Equipment 4 out of 5

How Fast Can A 250cc Motorcycle Go? (Data Compare)

Share Pin 0 Shares

For the majority of newbies, a motorcycle with a capacity of 250cc is the ideal option to start with.

Because 250cc is considered to be a small displacement motorbike which makes it is simple to master for the majority of beginners.

One question that is asked by every novice rider is the maximum speed for a motorcycle of 250cc. We’ll discuss what speed is a motorcycle with a capacity of 250cc in a brief manner.

So, How Fast Can A 250cc Motorcycle Go?

Most 250cc bikes can reach speeds of around 85mph (137 km/h) quickly,

however, the top speed varies based on the kind of motorcycle and the engine it’s powered by.

Since a sports bike has a higher top speed than cruisers or naked models of the same size.

In addition, the motorcycle’s top speed is also dependent on the overall condition of your bike.

If you take care to maintain your bike in the correct time frame then you’ll get better speeds than other people who do not care about service

. So, there are a variety of things that can affect your top speed, such as the fact that we talked about how the state of the motor and the types of roads, and the riders’ abilities.

250cc Motorcycle Speed Data Compare:

In the table below I have discussed the details of different 250cc motorcycles and their top speeds:

List of 250cc motorcycles that have their maximum speed

In the table above I have listed a variety of types of 250cc motorcycles within the table. These include sports cruiser Adventure, Naked, and Sports.

The majority of motorcycles that are in the range of 250cc do not correspond identically to the engine that is specified.

There is always some variation in the displacement of the motorbike.

So, on the list above the typical displacement of the engine of a motorcycle is between 250cc and 300cc.

Note:The maximum speed shown in the table above is not exactly the same or in any manner. The data above has been taken or recorded under specific conditions and roads. So, the speed of top-speed could vary by a small amount.

Is a motorbike of 250cc sufficient for highway use?

It is estimated that a 250cc bike can attain maximum speeds at 85mph (137 km/h) up to 90mph (145 km/h)easily which is more than enough to travel on highways.

You can cruise along and catch up with traffic faster.

Because a 250cc motorbike comes with low weight, it’s simple to handle and drive when you’re in traffic.

The speed of the motorbike depends on its physical construction and the chassis.

Motorcycles with sports capabilities can reach the highest speed faster than a naked or cruiser model within the same range of CC.

So, if you’re purchasing a cruiser or standard motorcycle model, you could be unable to reach its maximum speed of it.

So, if you’re contemplating purchasing a 250cc bike just for speed or maximum speed, I’ll recommend that you choose a sports model, since it has an engine that is high-revving and a smaller body.

In the next section, I have talked about some important aspects that impact the speed of the motorcycle. So, continue reading to find out what causes the bike to reach its maximum speed.

Factors that influence the maximum speed of the motorbike

The top speed of a motorcycle is dependent on a number of variables that must be maintained to keep the speed at which it is best.

In this article, I will go over what influences the speed and what you can take to reduce it.

Fastest Dirt Bikes Top Speed

The weight of the motorcycle and the rider

The primary element that determines the speed at which 250cc motorcycles is “weight”.

When I say weight, I refer to the weight of both riders as well as the bike.

The weight of the motorbike comprises the entire structure, the materials it is made of, what it is made of, materials and others.

Take the case of Royal 350cc enfiled, its top speed is 75mph to 80mph. The Kawasaki Ninja 250cc has a maximum speed of 100 miles per hour (170 kilometers/h).

You are aware of the differences between these two types of motorcycles.

While the larger displacement motorcycle has more power within engines, the less displacement bike will win the race.

The reason for this is because of the lighter weight of the vehicle and aerodynamically designed body.

In fact, the Royal Enfield is totally made from “steel” which makes the weight of the bike 20kg to 30kg when compared to the other competitor, Kawasaki Ninja 250.

However, any bike made from fiber will weigh less than a steel-constructed body.

Here I’ve shared an analysis of the weight of the motorcycles mentioned above to give you a better understanding about

Comparison of the weight of a motorcycle

Comparison of the weight of a motorcycle

Driving Skill of the Riders

The skills of the rider play an important role in achieving the maximum speed of the motorcycle.

Let’s look at this through an example. Imagine I fix an event between two riders by giving them the exact 250cc motorbike in the same condition, but there’s cheating.

Two riders will be involved one of them will be an experienced racer who has actually participated in the race.

The other is a regular guy with some experience riding the bike.

Tell me who will take the crown or get to the speed record earlier than one of the two competitors.

Many of you have already predicted. …. The racer will hit the speed limit earlier or be the winner.

Therefore, this shows that riding abilities are crucial in achieving the maximum speed of the motorbike that has any displacement.

If you’re looking to get to the maximum speed sooner, you should have some skill set.

In addition, if you’re a regular guy taking a bike to school or working, you shouldn’t be worried about this.

There is no need to go to maximum speed, you only must get home in a safe manner.

Take security measures and drive safely when you are in traffic.

Here’s an article that I have written based on my own experiences of riding in order to guide you on your to ride more efficiently and avoid excessive traffic.

Top 11 Tips For Riding Safely In Heavy Traffic

Motorcycle Chassis & Ergonomics

Ergonomics is the primary element that allows us to discern the function of the motorcycle. We can also determine if it’s built for speed or not.

You can tell the sports motorcycle from the first glimpse of the body, you will know that it was designed for speed. You can be sure that you’ll enjoy the fastest speed on the sports motorcycles, whether cruisers or naked.

Let’s look at what’s the fundamental element that makes the sporting bike distinct from other motorcycles? The most important things to make the sports bike distinct from other motorcycles are its aerodynamic chassis and fairing.

Windshield and fairing are the primary elements that aid the sports motorcycle to be more aerodynamic, which provides you with the fastest speed.

Do not think that only the chassis is the dominant factor, it’s not just like that. The highest speed is an outcome of the association of all the factors that I’ve discussed in the past and others that I’ll discuss in the future.

The types of engines that are used in motorcycles.

In discussing the engine, I will not get too deep into the inner workings of the motorbike engine. However, I will provide the necessary information in this article.

Engines are the primary and most important component of a motorcycle, without them the bike isn’t able to function. Your vehicle is operating because of the engine that is working as you drive.

There are several essential kinds of engines that determine the overall performance efficiency, speed, speed, and so on. The names of these engines are two-stroke and four-stroke.

They refer to the engine’s design or design which forms the base. Here, I’ve given an essential introduction to both terms.

Two-stroke Engine

This engine’s design helps you achieve speed and provide you with performance. It has more RPM than four-stroke engines.

Two-stroke engines are inexpensive, which is why they can produce vibrations and noises when you are riding with full throttle or the maximum speed. Two-stroke engines have smaller components than the four-stroke engine, which allows them to be repaired easily.

Since 2 stroke engines are built to operate at higher speeds and therefore, they tend to wear more quickly. This causes lots of pollutants because of the fuel and oil mixture into it.

Four-Stroke Engine

This engine design is extremely robust, durable, as well as more durable than two-stroke engines. Since four-stroke engines contain many parts, they require more maintenance, making them more expensive than two-stroke engines.

Four-strokes are a green engine model because it’s quieter and does not require the pre-mixing of fuel and fuel. However, it offers somewhat less power, like lower speeds and rpms.

Let’s now discuss the details of the engine’s fundamental component, the Cylinder that is the one that must be used.

Cylinder in Engines

Cylinders are the engine’s power unit. of the engine. It is the location where the combustion of fuel takes place and is transformed into power.

It is the number of these cylinders that directly impacts how fast and the rpm speed of the motorbike. A motor that has more cylinders will be better and have more speed than engines with fewer cylinders.

However, with more cylinders the amount of fuel consumed is likely to rise. A motor with fewer number of cylinders is more likely to be more efficient in fuel consumption.

If your main goal is speed and efficiency, then you should consider than four-cylinder engines.

Apollo 250cc Dirt Bike Top Speed Test

Conclusion

You should now be certain that you are required to have 250 cc motorcycles or not. As I’ve discussed many of the essential details in this article in a brief manner. If you think that I’ve missed some important points, tell me about it in the comments.

You maybe want to know:

Best Dirt Bike Bluetooth Headsets For Your Need

FAQs

Is 250cc suitable for a first-timer?

The majority of the 250cc motorcycles are lightweight and can achieve a highest speed, which is about 85-mph up to 90 mph which is sufficient for keeping you in front of the crowd. With all the advantages associated with 250cc motorcycles, it is an ideal one to consider it for first-time riders or for those who are new.

With over 10 years of experience working on cars and trucks Item Training Supervisor Richard Reina is known around the office as one of our technical experts & real an “automobile person”. His rate of interest began, in his very own words, “at the age of two when his father educated him the distinction in between a Chevy and a Ford. Since then it’s been cars regularly.” As a serious lover of practically all things with a motor Richard can address nearly any kind of inquiry related to car upkeep, fixing, or restoration & is a fact professional in electric motor background.

Kawasaki Ninja 250R

Motorcycle

This article is about Kawasaki’s twin-cylinder sport bike sold since 1986. For the single-cylinder version introduced in 2014, see Kawasaki Ninja 250SL

Type of motorcycle

The Kawasaki Ninja 250R (codenamed EX250; previous generations had market-specific names) is a motorcycle in the Ninja sport bike series from the Japanese manufacturer Kawasaki originally introduced in 1986. As the marque’s entry-level sport bike,[1][2] the motorcycle has undergone few changes throughout its quarter-century lifetime, having received only three substantial redesigns. In some markets the Ninja 250R has been succeeded by the Ninja 300.

Nomenclature [ edit ]
Since 2008, the bike is marketed as the Ninja 250R in all markets. It is also referred to by its platform designation, EX250, to which a generational suffix is attached. In the United States, previous models (EX250-E/F/G/H) were already being marketed as members of the Ninja family of sport bikes, while outside of the U.S. the bike was known variously as the ZZR-250, ZX-250, or as the GPX-250R. One of the earliest models, the EX250-C, was given the name GPZ-250.[citation needed]
Model history [ edit ]
Cleaning the chain on a Ninja 250R

The Ninja 250R’s particular ergonomics, chassis design, and engine placement have resulted in a motorcycle that straddles the standard and sport classes. The Ninja’s riding posture also falls between standard and sport.

The first generation was produced between 1983 and 1985, and known by the production number EX250-C. It was sold as the GPZ-250. Sold only in its home market of Japan, this earliest, belt-driven version was first produced in 1983, and shares no commonality with later generations.[citation needed] The bike has 32 mm fork tubes.

Produced between 1986 and 1987 was the EX250-E. This model was sold as the Ninja 250R in Canada and the U.S. between 1986 and 1987. It was known as the GPZ-250R elsewhere. When originally introduced, it was more costly than the Honda Rebel, and reviewers complained that while the 14,000 rpm redline was nice, the engine was slow to rev.[3]
EX-250-E Specifications[4] Engine Type Four-stroke Inline twin, DOHC, Liquid cooled, Eight-valve, with counterbalancer Displacement 248 cc (15.1 cu in) Bore and Stroke 62.0 mm × 41.2 mm (2.44 in × 1.62 in) Compression Ratio 12.0:1 Carburetion Keihin CVK32 (2), Constant velocity, diaphragm-type. Starting Electric Ignition Electronic advance Spark plug NGK C8HA or ND U24FS-L (Canada: NGK CR8HS or ND U24FSR-U) Fuel type n/a Transmission Type 6-speed manual, constant mesh, return shift Clutch Wet, multi-disc, manual, cable-actuated Frame/suspension Frame type Tubular diamond Rake/trail 27° / 83 mm (3.3 in) Front suspension Twin hydraulic telescoping fork Rear suspension Uni-Trak single-shock system Wheel travel, front 140 mm (5.5 in) Wheel travel, rear 130 mm (5.1 in) Tires and brakes Tire, front 100/80×16 Tire, rear 120/80×16 Brakes Single hydraulic disc Dimensions Wheelbase 1,400 mm (55 in) Overall length 1,985 mm (78.1 in) Overall width 695 mm (27.4 in) Overall height 1,075 mm (42.3 in) Ground clearance 135 mm (5.3 in) Seat height 745 mm (29.3 in) Weight (dry, wet) 304 lb (138 kg) (California model 305 lb (138.5 kg)) dry, 341 lb (154.5 kg) (California model 342 lb (155 kg)) wet[5]
344 lb (156 kg) wet, tested[6] Max load n/a Oil type/capacity SE or SF Class SAE 10W40-20W50/1.9 L (2.0 US qt) Performance 0–60 mph (0–97 km/h) n/a Quarter mile 15.4 s @ 87.82 mph (141.33 km/h)[6] Maximum speed 94 mph (151 km/h)[6] Maximum power 27.9 kW (37.4 hp) @ 11,000 rpm (Australia: 29.4 kW (39.4 hp) @ 12,500 rpm)[4] Maximum torque 24.5 N⋅m (18.1 ft⋅lb) @ 10,000 rpm (Australia: 23.5 N⋅m (17.3 ft⋅lb) @ 11,000 rpm)[4] Fuel efficiency 48 mpg ‑US (4.9 L/100 km; 58 mpg ‑imp )[6]
2006 Ninja 250R (EX250-F19)

1993 GPX 250 cockpit

For the 1988 model year, there were both cosmetic changes and changes in engine tuning. While the bore and stroke, and other major engine components, were unchanged, minor tuning adjustments were made. The carburetor diameters were reduced 2 mm to 30 mm (1.2 in), the cylinder compression ratio was increased from 12.0:1 to 12.4:1, ignition timing advance was increased, and the rear sprocket was increased by three teeth to 45.[4][5][7] Reviewers reported that this made the engine more free-revving, reaching the high 14,000 redline more quickly, and the tested top speed increased by a few miles per hour.[3][6][7] The new, more fully enclosed bodywork was complimented for being stylish, at the time, and easily mistaken for the larger Ninja 750.[3]
The third generation of production of the Ninja 250R encompassed three models:

EX250-F – The most widespread EX250 variant, the E model was completely revamped and sold as the F model between 1988 and 2007 in the United States. Canada received the model between 1988 and 1999, and it was available elsewhere as the GPX-250R as early as 1987.

EX-250-F Specifications[5][7] Engine Type Four-stroke Inline-twin, DOHC, Liquid-cooled, Eight-valve, with counterbalancer Displacement 248 cc Bore and Stroke 62.0 mm × 41.2 mm (2.44 in × 1.62 in) Compression Ratio 12.4:1 Carburetion Keihin CVK30 (2), Constant velocity, diaphragm-type. Starting Electric Ignition Electronic advance Spark plug NGK CR8HSA, CR8HIX, CR8HVX

option CR7HSA, CR7HIX Fuel type Min 91 RON / 87 AKI octane unleaded Transmission Type 6-speed manual, constant mesh, return shift Clutch Wet, multi-disc, manual, cable-actuated Frame/suspension Frame type Tubular diamond design Rake/trail 27° / 84 mm (3.3 in) Front suspension Twin hydraulic telescoping fork Rear suspension Uni-Trak single-shock Wheel travel, front 140 mm (5.5 in) Wheel travel, rear 130 mm (5.1 in) Tires and brakes Tire, front 100/80×16 Tire, rear 130/80×16 Brakes Single hydraulic disc (260mm front, 230mm rear) Dimensions Wheelbase 1,400 mm (55.1 in) Overall length 2,030 mm (80.1 in) Overall width 710 mm (28 in) Overall height 1,090 mm (43.1 in) Ground clearance 150 mm (6.1 in) Seat height 740 mm (29.3 in) Weight (dry, wet) 138 kg (304 lb) dry, 161 kg (355 lb) wet[5]
164 kg (362 lb) wet, tested[7] Max load 155 kg (341 lb) Oil type/capacity SE-SG Class SAE 10W40-20W50/1.9 L Performance 0–60 mph (0–97 km/h) 5.75 s[7] 1/4 mile 14.59 s @ 87.82 mph (141.33 km/h)[7] Maximum power 27.9 kW (37.4 hp)[5]
28.05 bhp (20.92 kW) @ 12500 rpm[7] Maximum torque 18 ft⋅lbf (24 N⋅m) @ 10,000 rpm[5]
13.15 ft⋅lb (17.83 N⋅m) @ 9,000 rpm tested at rear wheel[7] Fuel efficiency 48.0 mpg ‑US (4.90 L/100 km; 57.6 mpg ‑imp )[7]
55 mpg ‑US (4.3 L/100 km; 66 mpg ‑imp )[8]
74.2 mpg ‑US (3.17 L/100 km; 89.1 mpg ‑imp )[9]
EX250-G – Sold only in its home market of Japan, this version was known as the GPX-250R-II. It had dual front brakes and a wider wheel and tire (110/80-16). All other parts were identical to the -F model. It was sold after 1988.

EX250-H – This model came to Canada as the Ninja 250R between 2000 and 2002, after which it received a new name: ZZR-250, in line with the -H model’s name elsewhere in the world, where it had existed since 1992. This motorcycle has parts in common with the -F model, though it shares the same engine, albeit with different casings. It sports a lateral aluminum frame, a different fairing (designed to make it look sportier), larger 17-inch wheels, an adjustable rear shock absorber, adjustable brake and clutch levers, a smaller drive sprocket, computer-controlled timing advance, and a revised electrical system. It also had a smaller carburetor, & slightly different compression ratio, both of which were designed for quicker revving and slightly higher top end power. However, these upgrades came at a 6 kg weight gain.[ citation needed ]
Type of motorcycle

EX250-J Production 2008-2012 Engine 249 cc (15.2 cu in) liquid-cooled 4-stroke 8-valve DOHC parallel-twin Bore / stroke 62.0 mm × 41.2 mm (2.44 in × 1.62 in) Ignition type TCBI with digital advance Transmission 6-speed constant mesh Tires Front: 110/70-17M/C

Rear: 130/70-17M/C Rake, trail 26° Wheelbase 1,399.5 mm (55.10 in) Dimensions W : 713.7 mm (28.10 in)

H : 1,109.9 mm (43.70 in)

Seat height 774.7 mm (30.50 in) Weight 170 kg (375 lb) (wet)

In 2008, Kawasaki gave the EX250 its most extensive redesign in twenty years. The EX250-J model is known as the Ninja 250R worldwide, regardless of market.

Parts from the third generation are still found on the -J, but its redesigned exterior panels bring the Ninja’s appearance out of the 1990s and into line with late-2000s sportbikes. The engine and drivetrain retain 30% of the -F model’s parts, according to Kawasaki.[citation needed] The engine’s compression and maximum torque have been lowered to provide better midrange performance. The redesign of the engine resulted in improvements in engine response at low engine speeds, making the bike smoother and “much easier to ride.”[10]
Though the previous generation Ninja 250R had a peak power advantage of 1 to 5 hp (0.75 to 3.73 kW),[5][11][12] the new version’s 20 or 30 percent increase in mid-range power allows the bike to pull from 3,000 rpm where previously it had to be revved to 4,000 rpm.[13] The U.S. -J model uses dual carburetors like the -F model, but the European, Brazilian and Thai models have fuel injection. The wheels were increased in size to 17 inches, the front suspension was improved, and the brake rotors were replaced with a larger petal shape. On the carbureted version, a fuel gauge was added in place of the temperature gauge. With the additional and redesigned equipment, the EX250-J suffered a 10 kg (22 lb) increase in wet weight over its predecessors.

With the arrival of the EX250-J, manufacturing continues to be located in Thailand.[14]
2013 Ninja 250R (EX250-L)

The 2013 Ninja 250R had a new bodywork, twin headlights, a digital instruments cluster, new wheels with a wider 140 mm (5.5 in) rear tire, and a reworked engine and exhaust. ABS is available as an option. Like the previous generation, the engine is fuel injected in some markets and carbureted in others.[19][20][21] For 2013, in some markets, the Ninja 250R was replaced by the 296 cc (18.1 cu in) Ninja 300 (EX300), while in others they are sold alongside each other.[22]
2018 Ninja 250R

At the 2017 Tokyo Motor Show, Kawasaki introduced the 2018 Ninja 250R along with the all-new 2018 Ninja 400, with the latter to be sold in Europe and America, replacing the Ninja 300.[23]
See also [ edit ]
Kawasaki Ninja series

References [ edit ]

So you have finished reading the how fast does a ninja 250r go topic article, if you find this article useful, please share it. Thank you very much. See more: ninja 250r top speed km/h, ninja 250 0 to 60, ninja 250 hp, ninja 250r for sale, ninja 250r specs, ninja 250 price, ninja 250 weight, ninja 250 top speed 2021

Top 36 How Fast Does A Ninja 250R Go 3141 Votes This Answer

How fast does a 250cc street bike go?

How much HP does a Ninja 250R have?

Is the Ninja 250 a sport bike?

How fast does a 300 cc Ninja go?

Can a motorcycle go 300 mph?

Can a motorcycle go 200 mph?

Is the Ninja 250 fast?

How much is a Ninja 250 worth?

How fast is a 2012 Kawasaki Ninja 250R?

Is Ninja 250R a good bike?

Is a 250 a good starter bike?

How much is a Kawasaki 250?

How fast can a 1000cc Kawasaki Ninja go?

How Fast Is Ninja 400?

Which is faster R3 or Ninja 300?

Which is the fastest 250 cc bike?

How fast is 450cc in mph?

How fast is 600cc motorcycle?

How fast can a 500cc bike go?

KAWASAKI NINJA 250R (2008-2011) Review, Specs & Prices | MCN

How Fast Can A 250cc Motorcycle Go? (Data Compare) | Fodsports Blog

Kawasaki Ninja 250R – Wikipedia

Kawasaki Ninja 250 | Sport Motorcycle | Smooth & Agile

Kawasaki Ninja 300 – Wikipedia

Kawasaki Ninja 250R | Acceleration and Top Speed – MotoStatz

how fast does a ninja 250r go

Kawasaki Ninja 250 Review – Pros, Cons, Specs & Ratings

How fast does a 250R Ninja go? – Theburningofrome.com

What is the top speed of Kawasaki Ninja 250?

what’s your top speed on ninja 250? – ninjette.org

KAWASAKI NINJA 250R (2008-2011) Review, Specs & Prices

How Fast Can A 250cc Motorcycle Go? (Data Compare)

Kawasaki Ninja 250R

Leave a Comment Cancel reply