You are looking for information, articles, knowledge about the topic nail salons open on sunday near me molly blaisdell nh on Google, you do not find the information you need! Here are the best content compiled and compiled by the Chewathai27.com team, along with other related topics such as: molly blaisdell nh
Contents
HOME
- Article author: mollyblaisdell.com
- Reviews from users: 46850
Ratings - Top rated: 3.9
- Lowest rated: 1
- Summary of article content: Articles about HOME Molly Blaisdell, . author, illustrator, and Production Editor. Stories keep us forever young. Never lose sight of the wonder of it all. My Book Shelf. …
- Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for HOME Molly Blaisdell, . author, illustrator, and Production Editor. Stories keep us forever young. Never lose sight of the wonder of it all. My Book Shelf.
- Table of Contents:
Molly Blaisdell
- Article author: www.facebook.com
- Reviews from users: 10383 Ratings
- Top rated: 4.8
- Lowest rated: 1
- Summary of article content: Articles about Molly Blaisdell Molly Blaisdell is on Facebook. Join Facebook to connect with Molly Blaisdell and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes… …
- Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for Molly Blaisdell Molly Blaisdell is on Facebook. Join Facebook to connect with Molly Blaisdell and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes… Molly Blaisdell đang ở trên Facebook. Tham gia Facebook để kết nối với Molly Blaisdell và những người khác mà có thể bạn biết. Facebook trao cho mọi…
- Table of Contents:
In the Matter of Blaisdell :: 2021 :: New Hampshire Supreme Court Decisions :: New Hampshire Case Law :: New Hampshire Law :: US Law :: Justia
- Article author: law.justia.com
- Reviews from users: 4421 Ratings
- Top rated: 3.1
- Lowest rated: 1
- Summary of article content: Articles about In the Matter of Blaisdell :: 2021 :: New Hampshire Supreme Court Decisions :: New Hampshire Case Law :: New Hampshire Law :: US Law :: Justia … sexual intercourse between petitioner Molly Blaisdell, and another woman based upon In the Matter of Blanchflower & Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226 (2003), … …
- Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for In the Matter of Blaisdell :: 2021 :: New Hampshire Supreme Court Decisions :: New Hampshire Case Law :: New Hampshire Law :: US Law :: Justia … sexual intercourse between petitioner Molly Blaisdell, and another woman based upon In the Matter of Blanchflower & Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226 (2003), … In an interlocutory appeal, respondent Robert Blaisdell challenged a circuit court decision granting a motion to dismiss his cross-petition for divorce on fault grounds of adultery alleging sexual intercourse between petitioner Molly Blaisdell, and another woman based upon In the Matter of Blanchflower & Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226 (2003), which limited the definition of adultery under RSA 458:7, II (2018) to sexual intercourse between persons of the opposite sex. The New Hampshire Supreme Court overruled Blanchflower and reinterpreted the term “adultery,” as it was used in RSA 458:7, II, to include sexual intercourse between a married person and someone other than that person’s spouse, regardless of either person’s sex or gender. Accordingly, the Supreme Court reversed the circuit court and remanded for further proceedings.New Hampshire Supreme Court Cases, Opinions, Decisions
- Table of Contents:
Blaisdell, Molly | Capstone Young Readers
- Article author: shop.capstonepub.com
- Reviews from users: 19159 Ratings
- Top rated: 4.2
- Lowest rated: 1
- Summary of article content: Articles about
Blaisdell, Molly | Capstone Young Readers
Molly Blaisdell has an insatiable curiosity that leads to lots of questions. Her favorite one is “Why”? Honestly, she feels the best children’s books are … … - Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for
Blaisdell, Molly | Capstone Young Readers
Molly Blaisdell has an insatiable curiosity that leads to lots of questions. Her favorite one is “Why”? Honestly, she feels the best children’s books are … Blaisdell, MollyBlaisdell, Molly - Table of Contents:
In the Matter of Molly Blaisdell and Robert Blaisdell | Supreme Court of New Hampshire | 04-01-2021 | www.anylaw.com
- Article author: www.anylaw.com
- Reviews from users: 38284 Ratings
- Top rated: 4.1
- Lowest rated: 1
- Summary of article content: Articles about In the Matter of Molly Blaisdell and Robert Blaisdell | Supreme Court of New Hampshire | 04-01-2021 | www.anylaw.com Research the case of In the Matter of Molly Blaisdell and Robert Blaisdell, from the Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 04-01-2021. …
- Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for In the Matter of Molly Blaisdell and Robert Blaisdell | Supreme Court of New Hampshire | 04-01-2021 | www.anylaw.com Research the case of In the Matter of Molly Blaisdell and Robert Blaisdell, from the Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 04-01-2021. Research the case of In the Matter of Molly Blaisdell and Robert Blaisdell, from the Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 04-01-2021. AnyLaw is the FREE and Friendly legal research service that gives you unlimited access to massive amounts of valuable legal data.
- Table of Contents:
Ms. Blaisdell – Londonderry Middle School
- Article author: lms.londonderry.org
- Reviews from users: 6931 Ratings
- Top rated: 3.2
- Lowest rated: 1
- Summary of article content: Articles about
Ms. Blaisdell – Londonderry Middle School
Updating … - Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for
Ms. Blaisdell – Londonderry Middle School
Updating - Table of Contents:
See more articles in the same category here: Chewathai27.com/toplist.
In the Matter of Blaisdell
In an interlocutory appeal, respondent Robert Blaisdell challenged a circuit court decision granting a motion to dismiss his cross-petition for divorce on fault grounds of adultery alleging sexual intercourse between petitioner Molly Blaisdell, and another woman based upon In the Matter of Blanchflower & Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226 (2003), which limited the definition of adultery under RSA 458:7, II (2018) to sexual intercourse between persons of the opposite sex. The New Hampshire Supreme Court overruled Blanchflower and reinterpreted the term “adultery,” as it was used in RSA 458:7, II, to include sexual intercourse between a married person and someone other than that person’s spouse, regardless of either person’s sex or gender. Accordingly, the Supreme Court reversed the circuit court and remanded for further proceedings.
Capstone Young Readers
Select the product information you’d like to include in your Excel file and click [Export to Excel].
(ISBN, Title, Type, Quantity, Unit Price, and Amount are automatically included)
Format AR/ATOS Level Author
Copyright Graphic Books Literature Type
Guided Reading Level Lexile Level Early Intervention Level
Language Publisher Series
National & State Standards
C3 Framework Common Core FOSS Head Start International Baccalaureate Organization Next Generation Science (NGSS) STEM WIDA Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Department of Education (English) Puerto Rico Department of Education (Spanish) Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington DC West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming United States Holdings
In the Matter of Molly Blaisdell and Robert Blaisdell
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, One Charles Doe Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any editorial errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Errors may be reported by e-mail at the following address: [email protected]. Opinions are available on the Internet by 9:00 a.m. on the morning of their release. The direct address of the court s home page is: http://www.courts.state.nh.us/supreme.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
___________________________
9th Circuit Court-Manchester Family Division No. 2020-0211
IN THE MATTER OF MOLLY BLAISDELL AND ROBERT BLAISDELL
Submitted: January 14, 2021 Opinion Issued: April 1, 2021
Joshua Gordon, of Concord, for the petitioner, filed no brief.
Lothstein Guerriero, PLLC, of Concord (Theodore M. Lothstein on the brief), for the respondent.
DONOVAN, J. In this interlocutory appeal, the respondent, Robert Blaisdell, challenges a decision of the Circuit Court (McIntyre, J.) granting a motion to dismiss his cross-petition for divorce on fault grounds of adultery alleging sexual intercourse between the petitioner, Molly Blaisdell, and another woman based upon In the Matter of Blanchflower & Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226, 227-28 (2003), which limited the definition of adultery under RSA 458:7, II (2018) to sexual intercourse between persons of the opposite sex. Today, we overrule Blanchflower and reinterpret the term adultery, as it is used in RSA 458:7, II, to include sexual intercourse between a married person and someone other than that person s spouse, regardless of either sex or gender. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the circuit court and remand for further proceedings. I. Factual and Procedural History
The following pertinent facts are supported by the record or undisputed on appeal. In January 2019, the petitioner filed for divorce from the respondent on grounds of irreconcilable differences. In March 2019, the respondent filed an answer and a cross-petition for divorce on fault-based grounds of adultery, alleging an ongoing intimate relationship between the petitioner and another woman. In October 2019, the petitioner filed a motion to dismiss the fault-based claims of adultery, arguing [law] clearly states that adultery under RSA 458:7, II does not include homosexual relationships, see Blanchflower, 150 N.H. at 227-28, and, therefore, the respondent In November 2019, the circuit court granted the motion to dismiss the respondent cross-claim in a one-sentence margin order stating ased on the holding in [Blanchflower This Rule 8 interlocutory appeal followed. See Sup. Ct. R. 8.
II. Blanchflower and Subsequent Developments in the Law
The narrow question before the court in Blanchflower homosexual [intimate] relationship between a married person and another constitutes adultery within the meaning of RSA 458:7, II. Blanchflower, 150 N.H. at 227. In answering that question, we defined adultery sexual intercourse between a married man and someone other than his wife or Id. (quoting 30 (unabridged ed. 1961)). Further, we defin a
Id. (quoting Dictionary 441, 2082 (unabridged ed. 1961)). We observed that case law addressing adultery Id. at 228. We also explained that adultery as a ground for divorce was historically equated with the crime of adultery, which was defined as Id. (quotation omitted). Based upon the fore under RSA 458:7, II Id.
In 2009, six years after Blanchflower was decided, the New Hampshire legislature enacted a statute that redefined union of [two] eligibility requirements of this chapter may marry any other eligible person -a (2018). Additionally, the legislature adopted provisions converting existing civil unions into marriages by operation of law, RSA 457:46, II (2018), and recognizing same-sex marriages and civil unions from other jurisdictions as legal marriages, RSA 457:3, :45 (2018). In 2015, after same-sex marriage was adopted by statute in New Hampshire, the Supreme Court of the United States held that state laws denying marriage to same-sex couples violate the Federal Constitution. See Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584, 2607-08 (2015).
III. Stare Decisis Analysis
On appeal, the respondent invites us to overrule Blanchflower to the extent that it limits the definition of adultery to extramarital, sexual intercourse between persons of the opposite sex. The respondent contends that, given the statutory right of same-sex couples to marry, RSA 457:1-a, the RSA 458:7, II in Blanchflower is now discordant with the overall legislative scheme governing marriage in New Hampshire because it prohibits an adultery claim under RSA 458:7, II with respect to unfaithful spouses in same-sex marriages. The respondent further asserts that a stare decisis analysis weighs in favor of overruling Blanchflower, and that a proper interpretation of RSA 458:7, II requires as much. We accept the respondent invitation to revisit our holding in Blanchflower.
decisions, commands great respect in a society governed by the rule of law, and we do not lightly overrule a prior opinion. Seacoast Newspapers v. City of Portsmouth, 173 N.H. 325, 333 (2020) holding, the question is not whether we would decide the issue differently de novo, but whether the ruling has come to be seen so clearly as error that its Id. (quotation omitted).
We will overrule a decision only after considering: (1) whether the rule has proven to be intolerable simply by defying practical workability; (2) whether the rule is subject to a kind of reliance that would lend a special hardship to the consequence of overruling; (3) whether related principles of law have so far developed as to have left the old rule no more than a remnant of abandoned doctrine; and (4) whether facts have so changed, or come to be seen so differently, as to have robbed the old rule of significant application or justification. Id. Although these factors guide our judgment, no single factor is dispositive. Id.
First, with respect to the initial stare decisis factor, Blanchflower may have provided a workable rule, but it is no longer practical given that it defies any application to an entire class of legally married persons. Limiting adultery to heterosexual relationships also undermines the legislative intent underlying same-sex marriage laws. Accordingly, we conclude that the first factor weighs in favor of overruling Blanchflower. Second, we consider whether Blanchflower adultery statute is subject to a kind of reliance that would lend a special hardship to the consequence of overruling it. See id. Reliance interests are most often implicated when a rule is operative in the commercial law context where advance planning of great precision is most obviously a necessity. Id. We agree with the respondent that no such reliance interests are implicated by Blanchflower 1 As the respondent observes, individuals rely on their sexual preferences and romantic sensibilities when deciding with whom to be intimate, not judicial decisions.
Third, we consider whether related principles of law have developed such that the old rule is no more than a remnant of an abandoned doctrine. Id. This factor concerns whether the law has developed in such a manner as to undercut the prior rule. State v. Balch, 167 N.H. 329, 335 (2015). Such development could arise upon the promulgation of new laws or rules that render past decisions obsolete or upon the formulation of laws across multiple jurisdictions in a manner that is discordant with the prior rule. Id. As we have already explained, New Hampshire adopted same-sex marriage by statute in 2009, see RSA 457:1-a, and, as the Supreme Court determined in Obergefell, the Federal Constitution forbids any jurisdiction in the United States from maintaining laws prohibiting same-sex marriage. 2 Obergefell, 135 S. Ct. at 2607-08. After many years of same-sex couples dignity in the eyes of the law by way of legally recognized marriages, the Supreme Court determined t Id. at 2608. It defies logic to suggest that our legislature and the Supreme Court recognized the rights of same-sex couples to enter into legally valid marriages without also intending that same-sex couples be endowed with all of the responsibilities, protections, and grounds for divorce that are associated with the legal status of
1 Even if a person were to have engaged in an extramarital affair with a person of the same sex in reliance on Blanchflower to insulate them from a fault-based divorce action, reliance on judicial precedent to protect marital infidelity is not the type of reasonable reliance that the second factor of the stare decisis analysis seeks to protect. See State v. Duran, 158 N.H. 146, 157 (2008) second . . . those who have relied reasonably Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 855 (1992)).
2 Notwithstanding these developments, the full extent of the rights and protections intended to flow from them have been limited by statutes that are no longer consonant with the current definition of marriage. See, e.g., RSA 460:2- man and woman in contemplation of
sect or society which professes to believe the relation of husband and wife unlawful, and has refused to cohabit with the other for 6 may wish to review these statutes to address these anomalies. marriage. Blanchflower statutory definition of adultery to sexual intercourse between persons of the opposite sex removes the legal protection of the marital promise of fidelity from same-sex marriages, and is clearly a remnant of the abandoned doctrine denying same-sex couples the right to enter into legally valid marriages.
Fourth, we ask whether facts have so changed, or come to be seen so differently, as to have robbed the old rule of significant application or justification. Seacoast Newspapers, 173 N.H. at 334. The institution of marriage has not stood in isolation from developments in law and society, and t]he history of marriage is one of both continuity and change. Obergefell, 135 S. Ct. at 2595. When Blanchflower was decided, the law and public opinion surrounding the rights of same-sex couples to engage in intimate association and marriage had already begun to transform. See Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 578 (2003) (holding that the Due Process Clause of the Federal Constitution protects the right of same-sex couples to enjoy intimate association); Goodridge v. Department of Public Health, 798 N.E.2d 941, 969 (Mass. 2003) (holding protections, benefits, and obligations of civil marriage solely because that person would marry a person of the same sex violates the Massachusetts Indeed, the dissent in Blanchflower argued adhere to the primary definition of adultery in the 1961 edition of [the
Blanchflower, 150 N.H. at 230 (Brock, C.J., dissenting). Significant change continued in the years that followed Blanchflower, including the legal recognition of same-sex marriage in New Hampshire, and shortly thereafter, across the United States. See RSA 457:1-a; Obergefell, 135 S. Ct. at 2607-08. These developments have left the rule derived from Blanchflower without justification, rendering any application of the rule inconsistent with the current state of the law.
In sum, the view of the institution of marriage underpinning our holding in Blanchflower has changed in the eyes of the law and society. Thus, at the conclusion of our stare decisis analysis, three factors weigh in favor of overruling, and the second factor dealing with reliance interests is not implicated in this case. Accordingly, we overrule Blanchflower to the extent that it limits the definition to sexual intercourse between persons of the opposite sex.
IV. Reinterpretation of RSA 458:7, II
Having overruled Blanchflower, we next take the opportunity to rei it is used in RSA 458:7, II, because the issue is likely to arise on remand. In matters of statutory interpretation, we are the final arbiter of the intent of the legislature as expressed in the words of the statute considered as a whole. Petition of Carrier, 165 N.H. 719, 721 (2013). We first look to the language of the statute itself, and, if possible, construe that language according to its plain and ordinary meaning. Id. We interpret legislative intent from the statute as written and will not consider what the legislature might have said or add language that the legislature did not see fit to include. Id. We construe all parts of a statute together to effectuate its overall purpose and avoid an absurd or unjust result. Id. Moreover, we do not consider words and phrases in isolation, but rather within the context of the statute as a whole. Id. This consideration of the statute, as a whole, enables
in light of the policy or purpose sought to be advanced by the statutory scheme. Id.
from the bonds of matrimony shall be decreed in favor of the innocent party for any of the following causes: . . . Adultery is defined as voluntary sexual intercourse between a married man and someone other than his wife or
Third New International Dictionary 30 (unabridged ed. 2002). Sexual intercourse is defined as either heterosexual intercourse involving penetration of the vagina by the penis: intercourse involving genital contact between individuals other than penetration of the vagina by the penis Id. at 2082.
The respondent isolation; instead, we attempt to do so in harmony with the overall statutory Estate of Gordon-Couture v. Brown, 152 N.H. 265, 272 (2005). He also argues that defining the term adultery to include sexual intercourse between persons of the same sex would harmonize RSA 458:7, II and RSA 457:1-a, both of which are part of the legislative scheme governing marriage. To do the opposite, the respondent contends, would be to interpret those two statutes in contradiction with each other in contravention of our rules of statutory interpretation because [w]e generally assume that when the legislature enacts a provision, it has in mind previously enacted statutes Prof. Fire Fighters of Wolfeboro v. Town of Wolfeboro, 164 N.H. 18, 22 (2012). We agree with the respondent.
Limiting the definition of adultery to sexual intercourse between two persons of the opposite sex would be inconsistent with the legislature s enactment of same-sex marriage over a decade ago, resulting in RSA 457:1-a and in RSA 458:7, II incongruously providing that infidelity may be a ground for divorce only if it is committed between people of the opposite sex. Such an interpretation would not effectua of protecting the marital promise of fidelity in all legally recognized marriages and would lead to an absurd and unjust result. Although the dictionary retains the we used to reach our decision in Blanchflower, it now includes a definition that is applicable regardless of the sex or gender of the persons engaged in the described conduct. See Third New International Dictionary 2082 (unabridged ed. 2002) (defining sexual intercourse than penetration of the vagina by the penis . This broader definition is better suited to legal landscape. See RSA 457:1-a; Obergefell, 135 S. Ct. at 2607-08.
Moreover, interpreting RSA 458:7, II to provide that spousal infidelity may be a ground for divorce only in marriages between persons of the opposite
Obergefell where an otherwise acceptable construction of a statute would raise serious constitutional problems, the Court will construe the statute to avoid such problems unless such construction is plainly contrary to [legislative] intent. Polonsky v. Town of Bedford, 171 N.H. 89, 96 (2018) (emphasis and brackets omitted) (quoting DeBartolo Corp. v. Fla. Gulf Coast Trade Council, 485 U.S. 568, 575 (1988)). Accordingly, for purposes of RSA 458:7, II, the term adultery is defined as voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person , regardless of the sex or gender of either person. include heterosexual intercourse involving penetration of the vagina by the penis, and intercourse involving genital contact other than penetration of the vagina by the penis. 3
V. Retroactive Application
Finally, the respondent requests that we clarify the applicability of our ruling to this case on remand. In her motion for summary disposition of this appeal, the petitioner that any ch appellate decisions were presumptively retroactive because, by stating what the Lee James Enterprises, Inc. v. Town of Northumberland, 149 N.H. 728, 729-30 (2003).
at times can cause harsh results, when, consistent with the doctrine of stare Id. at 730. Therefore, we
Id.
3 We observe that, in a very different context, the legislature has more broadly and precisely al Code. See RSA 632-A:1, IV; V (Supp. 2020). Whether these definitions should apply to adultery claims in the context of marital law involves policy considerations best suited for the legislature. In this case, as explained above, we have considered whether Blanchflower interpretation of the adultery statute is subject to a kind of reliance that would lend a special hardship to the consequence of overruling it, and concluded that it is not. Consistent with that determination, we further conclude that justice would not be better served by applying our decision only prospectively. Accordingly, our decision today shall apply retroactively. See id.
Reversed and remanded.
HICKS, BASSETT, and HANTZ MARCONI, JJ., concurred.
So you have finished reading the molly blaisdell nh topic article, if you find this article useful, please share it. Thank you very much. See more:
