Is 58 Smaller Than 1 Inch? All Answers

Critical Body is the number one resource for learning how a sustainable exercise program can improve your physical health and mental well-being over the long term. We create in-depth strength training tutorials so fitness enthusiasts like you can progress faster and avoid injuries by exercising with proper form.

Body mass index (BMI) has been used for decades as a tool to measure relative fat content and weight status. It first became popular in the early 1970s when the famous American physiologist Ancel Keys gave a new name to the formula developed in the 1840s. It has become, and remains, king among government health agencies and medical offices everywhere.

But the metric, based on an underlying formula of weight divided by height squared, has been criticized as well as being ubiquitous. And it’s not just public health advocates who question its effectiveness. A professor of numerical analysis at Oxford University once called it a “bizarre measurement” in a letter to The Economist (Paywall). It was invented before calculators, when a formula had to be very simple, he wrote. “As a result of this unfounded definition, millions of short people think they are thinner than they are, and millions of tall people think they are fatter.”

Even the measurement’s inventor, a Belgian mathematician named Adolphe Quetelet, specifically said that it was too crude to use to calculate the fat content of individuals.

What today’s BMI critics find most troubling is that measuring abdominal fat, also known as visceral adipose tissue (VAT), or just visceral fat, which accumulates around internal organs when people gain obesity, doesn’t completely measure it considered more dangerous than regular subcutaneous fat because it behaves differently in the body. Therefore, abdominal fat is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and breast cancer in women. It has also been linked to an increased risk of dementia and an overall shorter lifespan.

Waist height ratio is a better tool for estimating visceral fat

Now, in a paper just published in PLOS ONE, physiologists at Leeds Beckett University in the UK have confirmed that there is a better way to predict body and abdominal fat: the waist height ratio (WHtR), which is determined by dividing your waist by your height.

They came to this conclusion after measuring actual body fat and composition in 81 people using a high-precision full-body scanner and then comparing the results to those of various anthropometrics commonly used to predict body fat and obesity, including BMI, WHtR, waistline -to-height ratio0.5 , waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio.

Based on BMI alone, only one in seven participants would have been classified as obese in terms of their total body fat, while according to the WHtR, the more precise figure of one in two or half of the participants would meet this threshold. WHtR was also a more accurate proxy for measuring abdominal fat in both men and women. (Waist-to-hip ratio was the weakest formula of the bunch.)

The study, led by Michelle Swainson, professor of exercise physiology, found that the cutoff value for predicting whole-body obesity was 0.53 for males and 0.54 for females, using the WHtR ratio. while a ratio of 0.59 and greater in both sexes indicated abdominal obesity.

That number could be even lower. In another study, Margaret Ashwell, Senior Visiting Fellow at City University London, found through several studies – including a meta-analysis of 44 studies in adults and 13 in children – that the risk of developing diabetes and cardiovascular disease was reduced , a WHtR above 0.50 starts to rise. Their research also found that the WHtR measurement more accurately measures life expectancy. It also beats the BMI and waist circumference matrix that some doctors rely on.

Use a tape measure, a piece of string or our calculator

As a screening tool, Ashwell and Swainson say the WHtR metric has several other selling points: It’s easier to calculate than BMI and works for any race, age, or gender. You don’t even need to have a tape measure handy to use it. Using a piece of string, a person can measure their height, then fold the string in half and see if it fits around their waist.

Even easier, enter your numbers into our calculator.

Ashwell has suggested that governments adopt a simple public health message: “Keep your waistline less than half your height.” This means that someone who is 5 feet 5 (65 inches; 167.64 centimeters) tall should have a waist of less than 33 inches or 84 centimeters. A person who is six feet tall (72 inches; 182 centimeters) should keep their waist under 36 inches or 91 centimeters.

Focus on health risks, not weight loss

According to Ashwell’s Shape Chart, a WHtR between 0.40 and 0.50 is ideal, which typically creates a pear-shaped physique, but a person should consider losing some weight if his or her WHtR ratio is between 0.50 and 0 .60 (somewhere between a pear and an apple). She calls the body shape below the 0.40 ratio a chili pepper and suggests you be “careful” at that level, adding, “You don’t have to slim your waist.”

At a ratio of 0.60 and above, which typically produces an apple-shaped silhouette, she asks, “Why don’t you talk to your GP and take action?”

customs service

Abbreviation/symbol:

in

” (a double prime number)

(For example, six inches can be symbolized as either 6 inches or 6 inches).

Unit of:

length / distance

Worldwide use:

The inch is both an imperial unit and part of the United States system of customary units, and as such has been used extensively in the past. The inch is still a common unit in the US and is popular in Canada and the UK. Japanese manufacturers like Sony and Toshiba commonly use inches to describe the size of monitors.

Description:

The inch is a unit of length used primarily in the Imperial and United States measurement systems, representing 1/12 foot and 1/36 yard.

Definition:

The use of customs can be traced back to the 7th century. The first explicit definition of its length that we could find was after 1066, when it was defined as the length of three barleycorns. This was not a satisfactory reference as stye lengths naturally vary. The British Standards Institute defined the inch as 25.4 mm in the 1930 document “Metric Units in Engineering: Going SI”. In March 1932 the American Standards Association was asked to decide whether to adopt the same value (at the time the American inch was 1/0.03937 mm, which was approximately 25.400051 mm). Since the values ​​were so close and Britain had already agreed on this value, the ASA adopted this value on March 13, 1933.

Origin:

The inch has been a unit of measurement in the United Kingdom since at least the seventh century and was defined in 1066 as equal to the length of three grains of dried barley strung together (a definition that survived for several centuries). ).

In the 12th century the Scottish inch was defined as the width of an average man’s thumb at the base of the nail. Similar units of measurement existed in many areas of what is now modern Europe, with the word for inch being the same or very similar to the word for thumb in Portuguese, French, Italian, Spanish and numerous other languages.

The English word inch is derived from the Latin uncia, meaning one twelfth (an inch is traditionally equal to 1/12 foot).

As late as the 20th century, various definitions of duty were used around the world, but differed by less than 0.001%. In 1930 the British Standards Institution adopted an inch exactly 25.4mm, the American Standards Association in 1933, and the first country to legislate on this definition was Canada in 1951.

In 1959, the United States and British Commonwealth countries signed a treaty agreeing to the standardized 25.4mm definition.

The English word inch derives from the Latin word uncia, meaning “one twelfth” – because an inch was defined as one twelfth of a foot. The word inch in other languages ​​is often similar to the word “thumb” as thumb width was a measurement used to define an inch – for example King David I of Scotland defined inch as “the width of the thumb of a medium sized man”. Man, measured by the root of a nail”. In England we find the definition of an inch as the length of 3 grains of barley in a statue of Edward 2nd in 1324.

Common references:

A US quarter coin (25 cents) is just under an inch in diameter.

A fully grown human eyeball is about 2.5 cm in diameter.

1 foot, 12 inches

1 meter, 39.37008 inches

45 RPM vinyl singles — the popular way to buy music from the 1960s through the 1990s — were typically 7 inches in diameter. Long-players (LPs) were typically 12 inches in diameter

Rulers are usually marked 30 cm and 12 inches because 12 inches = 30.048 cm

A can of Coke is 4.83 inches high

Context of use:

In 1995 the UK officially adopted the inch (along with the foot, yard and mile) as the primary unit of measurement for road signs and associated distance and speed measurements. In other contexts, metric measurements are now the primary system, although inches are still often used informally, particularly by people born and educated in pre-decimal Britain.

In the United States, surveyors use the U.S. Survey inch, defined as 1/39.37 meter, derived from the Mendenhall Order of 1893 which equated 1 foot to 1200/3937 meters.

Component Units:

The inch is traditionally the smallest whole unit of length in the imperial system, with measurements smaller than an inch being given using the fractions 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, and 1/64 of an inch.

In the UK, precision mechanics began using thousandths of an inch in the early 19th century as greater accuracy of measurement became possible, and multiples of this new fraction later became known as thousand.

multiples:

1 IN to CM to MM

The following two unit relationships are used to convert from inches to centimeters and then to millimeters.

1 inch = 2.54 centimeters

1 centimeter = 10 millimeters

Now that we know the relationship between inches, centimeters, and millimeters, let’s take a look at the steps for this conversion.

Step 1: Convert inches to centimeters

To find how many centimeters is in an inch, first divide 2.54 centimeters by 1, which equals 2.54 centimeters. Multiply 2.54 centimeters by 1 inch, and the end result is 2.54 centimeters.

Step 2: Convert centimeters to millimeters

Second, to find how many millimeters is 2.54 centimeters, divide 10 millimeters by 1 centimeter, which is 25.4 millimeters. Multiply 25.4 millimeters by 1 centimeter for the final result of 25.4 millimeters. One inch equals 25.4 millimeters.

meters instead

Other unit relationships can also be used. For example, if you didn’t know exactly how many millimeters are in 1 centimeter, you could have converted centimeters to meters and then meters to millimeters. The following unit relations would be used.

There are many easy ways to estimate measurements using body parts or objects you may have on hand. This can be useful when shopping to determine if an item is the right size – for example wallpaper or fabric with a specific sample size. It is particularly helpful for model building enthusiasts such as model railway enthusiasts or dollhouse collectors who are always on the lookout for interesting accessories for their hobby.

Learn the lengths of some common body parts and common objects, and use them to estimate object measurements.

Usual measurements based on your body

Parts of your body can be used to estimate many common units of measurement. Of course, people vary in height, so it’s best to measure your own body parts first to understand how close your own proportions are to these averages.

An inch (2.5 cm) is roughly the measurement from the top knuckle of your thumb to the tip of your thumb. Measure yours to see how close it is to 1 inch. Finally, always have a thumb handy for a guide on measuring anything under 6 inches (15 cm)! For model miniatures such as the standard dollhouse scale (1:12), 1 inch is approximately 1 foot.

is approximately the measurement from the top knuckle of your thumb to the tip of the thumb. Measure yours to see how close it is to 1 inch. Finally, always have a thumb handy for a guide on measuring anything under 6 inches (15 cm)! For model miniatures such as the standard dollhouse scale (1:12), 1 inch is approximately 1 foot. Four inches (10 cm) or a hand’s width for measuring horses is approximately the width of most people’s hands, measured across the lower knuckles (excluding the thumb).

or a hand’s breadth for measuring horses, is roughly the width of most people’s hands, measured across the lower knuckles (excluding thumbs). A yard (36 inches or 92 cm) is roughly the distance from your nose to the knuckle of your index finger (with your hand in a fist) on an outstretched arm. If you use this measurement frequently, measure your arm to see how close this measurement is to 1 yard.

is roughly the distance from your nose to the knuckle of your index finger (with your hand in a fist) on an outstretched arm. If you use this measurement frequently, measure your arm to see how close this measurement is to 1 yard. A meter (39 inches) is a similar measurement to the yard above, but using your arm with your fingers outstretched, measure to your fingertips. This is an easy way to estimate yards and meters of cord, fabric, or ribbon. Check the length of your arm with a ruler or tape measure to find out how close that distance is to 1 meter for you.

is a similar measurement to the yard above, but using your arm with your fingers outstretched, measure to the tip of your finger. This is an easy way to estimate yards and meters of cord, fabric, or ribbon. Check the length of your arm with a ruler or tape measure to find out how close that distance is to 1 meter for you. An elbow length, or the distance from your bent elbow to your fingertips, is 35 to 48 cm (15 to 18 inches) for most people.

or the distance from your bent elbow to your fingertips is 35 to 48 cm (15 to 18 inches) for most people. A woman’s foot in size 9 (USA and Canada) is usually 25 cm long. In Europe this is a size 40 and in the UK it is a size 6.5.

Measurements based on office supplies

Common objects that you have in your office or on your desk at home have standard measurements that can be used to estimate the measurements of other objects.​

A standard business card is 3.5 inches long x 2 inches high (9 cm x 5 cm).

is 3.5 inches long x 2 inches high (9 cm x 5 cm). Standard credit and ID cards are 8.5 cm x 5.4 cm (3.4 inches wide x 2.1 inches high).

are 3.4 inches wide x 2.1 inches high (8.5 cm x 5.4 cm). A standard sheet of printer paper is 8.5 inches by 11 inches.

is 8.5 inches x 11 inches. Business envelopes are 4 inches x 9.5 inches.

are 4 inches x 9.5 inches. A standard paper clip is 1 inch long; a large paper clip is 1.8 inches.

Using coins and bills to measure

Almost everyone carries a few bills or coins in their pocket, and knowing their dimensions can help you estimate the dimensions of other items.

A US bill is 2.6 inches high x 6.2 inches long (6.6 cm x 15.8 cm).

is 2.6 inches high x 6.2 inches long (6.6 cm x 15.8 cm). Canadian bills are 6 inches long x 2.8 inches high (15.2 cm x 7 cm).

are 6 inches long x 2.8 inches high (15.2 cm x 7 cm). A 1 cent coin has a diameter of 2 cm.

has a diameter of 0.75 inch (2 cm). A quarter has a diameter of almost 2.5 cm.

The spruce

Standard furniture dimensions

You can use these standard measurements as a basis for estimating the approximate size of larger items. And by converting the dimensions, you can also use them when buying furniture or accessories for model buildings or dollhouses. The following sizes are the sizes of the real objects: For example, at 1:12 scale, a 6 foot (72 inch) door would be 6 inches high (15 cm).

Modern standard doors are 198 to 203 cm high.

are 78 to 80 inches (198 to 203 cm) tall. The tabletop of a dining room is usually 76 cm above the floor.

is usually 30 inches (76 cm) above the ground. The seat of a dining chair is usually 38 to 43 cm off the floor.

using your smartphone

Not only can the physical phone itself act as a unit of measure when you look up its dimensions, but you may also find that it offers apps that provide an actual ruler scale that you can use to measure small items placed on the face of the phone .

Course Tool List

Course tool list for automotive engineering courses. Contains wrench and socket size information.

Q: Why is plywood sold in odd gauges like 15/32″ instead of 1/2″?

A: Plywood can be divided into two distinct groups – faceted and unfaced – which accounts for some of the unusual size descriptions. Sanded sheets of plywood (used for finished applications such as cabinetry and furniture) are typically 1/4 to 1-1/4 inch thick. The ground plates are manufactured to a tolerance of 1/64″ for plates up to 3/4″. thick (with thicker panels accounting for +/- 3 percent of the total). Tolerance (allowable range) for unsanded plywood is 1/32″ for panels up to 13/16″. thick (and +/- 5 percent for thicker plywood). The reason for unsanded plywood, such as B. Sheath is described as 15/32-in. thick is meant to reflect the manufacturer’s tolerance of 1/32 inch, although in layman’s terms the blade is 1/2 inch. plywood panel.

US standard clothing sizes for women were originally developed from statistical data in the 1940s and 1950s. At that time, they were conceptually similar to the European clothing size standard EN 13402, although individual manufacturers have repeatedly deviated from it, sometimes significantly.

However, as a result of various cultural constraints, most notably vanity sizes, North American clothing sizes have strayed significantly from this standard over time and have very little connection to it today. Instead, they now follow the more loosely defined standards known as US catalog sizes.

Body measurements below are in inches.

history [edit]

Standard sizes for men were probably first developed during the American Revolutionary War and were regularly used by the American Army for ready-made uniforms during the War of 1812 (Felsenthal 2012). These were based on chest girth, with other measurements assumed to be either proportional (girth of neck, waist, hips, and thighs) or easily changeable (length of inseam) (Felsenthal 2012).

Since this was largely successful in men, the same approach using bust size as the sole measure was attempted in women in the early 20th century (Felsenthal 2012). This proved unsuccessful, however, as women’s bodies have a far greater variety of shapes. The hourglass figure is often used as the industry standard, but only 8% of women have this body shape (Felsenthal 2012). An hourglass woman and an apple woman who have the same bust size do not have the same waist or hip measurements.

This was a significant problem for mail order companies and several attempts at predictable standard sizes have been made (Felsenthal 2012). In the 1940s, statisticians Ruth O’Brien and William Shelton received a grant from the Works Progress Administration to undertake the most ambitious effort to solve this problem. Her team measured nearly 15,000 women across the United States. After discovering the complex variety of women’s actual sizes, which produced five to seven different body types, they proposed a three-part sizing system. Each size would be the combination of a single number representing a torso measurement plus an indicator of height (short, average, and tall) and an indicator of girth (slender, average, and heavy). The various combinations of height and girth resulted in nine different sizes for each numerical torso measurement, which was highly impractical for manufacturing (Felsenthal 2012).

As a result, O’Brien and Shelton’s work was rejected. In 1958, the National Bureau of Standards invented a new sizing system based on the hourglass figure and using only bust size to create an arbitrary size standard from 8 to 38, specifying height (short, regular, and tall) and lower body circumference (plus or minus ). The resulting commercial standard was not very popular and was declared voluntary in 1970 and withdrawn entirely in 1983. In 1995, ASTM International published its own voluntary standard, which has since been revised (Felsenthal 2012). It’s not widespread.

Women’s Sizes [ edit ]

Women’s sizes are divided into different types depending on height. These tables are only a sizing guide and are by no means accurate as they vary from manufacturer to manufacturer, sometimes up and down by a full inch.

Overview [ edit ]

There are several size types, suitable for slightly different body shapes. Variations include the height of the person’s torso (known as back length), whether the chest, waist, and hips are straight (characteristic of teens) or more curvaceous (like many adult women), and whether the chest is higher or lower (characteristic of younger ones). or older women). These categories include:

Missizes The most common size category. For women of about average height (5ft 4in) with an average bust and hourglass figure. Dress sizes may be given as chest inches (e.g. 36), but straight sizes from 2 to 16 are more common. The categorical sizes range from XS (extra small) to XL (extra large). Junior sizes For small women with larger busts and fairly straight bodies. Junior sizing is usually given as odd-numbered sizes from 1 to 15, which is the next higher number in women’s sizing Women’s sizing or plus size For taller women of average height, sometimes with a smaller bust As with women’s sizing, sizes can be given as a dress size based on bust, but you are usually given as even-numbered sizes 18 and up. Categorical sizes usually range from 1X (similar to extra large but with slightly different proportions compared to ladies’ sizing) up to more hourglass body shapes. Sizing is standard for ladies and is m with a P marked as in 10P. Junior petite For very small women with average breasts and fairly straight bodies. The size can be denoted as “5JP” or as “5P”. Women’s Petite For taller, smaller women, sometimes with lower busts. Sizes are marked with a P as with women, as with 20P. Young Junior For small women with high breasts and fairly straight bodies. Large Sizes For larger women (usually 5’8″ or above), usually with a proportionally average bust size and an hourglass figure. Sizes are usually written with the appropriate missize and a T to indicate how large, as in “10T”. Half Sizes For small women with lower busts and more hourglass shaped bodies Sizes are written with ½, as in “10½”.

details [edit]

Please compare with your favorite fit charts. These measurements are at odds with many other size charts. These charts are significantly smaller than many current US apparel companies.

Sample Sizes – DuBarry / Woolworth (1931-1955)[1] 5’3″–5’6″ tall, average: bust (3″ < hip), waist (9" < hip) measurement/height 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 22 Bust 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 36 38 40 Waist 23 23.5 24 25 26 27 28 30 32 34 Hip 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 39 41 43 Women's Sizes (PS 42-70)[2] (1971) 5'2½"–5'6½" tall, average bust, average back measurement/height 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 bust 31½ 32½ 33½ 35 36½ 38 40 42 44 Waist 22½ 23½ 24½ 26 27½ 29 31 33 35 Hips 33½ 34½ 35½ 37 38½ 40 42 44 46 Back Waist Length 14½ 15 15¼ 15½ 15¾ 16 16¼ 16½ 16¾ Women's Sizing (ASTM D5585 95 (R2001)) (1995, Revised 2001) 5'3½" - 5'8" Tall Dimension/Size 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Bust 32 33 34 35 36 37½ 39 40½ 42½ 44½ Waist 24 25 26 27 28 29½ 31 32½ 34½ 36½ Hip 34½ 35½ 36½ 37½ 38½ 40 41½ 43 45 47 Women's Sizes (ASTM D5585 11e1)[3] (2011) 5'5½" Tall Dimension/Height 00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Bust 31⅛ 31¾ 33 34⅛ 35¼ 36¼ 37¼ 38¾ 40⅜ 42⅛ 54 .6 Waist (Straight 4 .6) 26⅛ 26⅝ 28½ 29½ 32¼ 36 38¼ 40½ WAIST (Curvy) 23⅞ 26⅛ 28 29 30¾ 34½ 36¾ 39 hip (Straight) 33¼ 36⅜ 37½ 39½ 42 46 48 hip (Curvy) 34 34⅝ 35⅞ 37⅛ 38¼ 39¼ 40¼ 41¾ 43¼ 45 46¾ 48¾ Women's Sizes 5'5"-5'9" (165-175cm) tall average bust average back measurement/height 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 bust 32-34 34 35½ 36½ 38 39½ 41 waist 22-24½ 25½ 27½ 29 30 31½ 33 Hips 33-35½ 36½ 38 39 41 42½ 44 Back Waist Length 14½ 14¾ 15¾ 16 16¼ 16½ 16¾ [4] Miss Petite 5'1"-5'3" (157.5-160cm) Tall Average Bust Shorter Back Dimension/Height 4mp 6mp 8mp 10mp 12mp 14mp 16mp Chest 32-34 34 35 36 37½ 39 40½ Waist 21 –23½ 24½ 26½ 27½ 29 30½ 32 Hips 34-35½ 36½ 38½ 39½ 41 42½ 44 Back Waist Length 14 14½ 14¾ 15 15¼ 15½ 15¾ [citation required] Junior Sizes 5'4"-5'5" (162.5-165cm) tall higher bust shorter back Measurement/Size 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 Chest 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Waist 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Hips 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Back Waist Length 13.75 14 14.25 14.5 14.75 15 15.25 15.5 15.75 [citation required] Junior Petite Sizes 5'1" (155cm) Tall Average Bust Shorter Back Measurement/Height 3jp 5jp 7jp 9jp 11jp 13jp Bust 30.5 31 32 33 34 35 Waist 22.5 23 24 25 26 27 Hip 31.5 32 33 34 35 36 back waist length 14 14.25 14.5 14.75 15 15.25 [citation required] Young Junior Sizes 155-160cm (5'1"-5'3") Tall Higher Bust Shorter Back Dimension/Size 5/6 7/8 9/10 11/12 13/14 15/16 Bust 28 29 30.5 32 33.5 35 waist 22 23 24 25 26 27 hip 31 32 33.5 35 36.5 38 back waist length 13.5 14 14.5 15 15.5 16 [citation required] Women's Sizes 5'5"-5'6" (165-168 cm) Height Average Chest Average Back 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 Chest 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 Waist 30 32 34 35.5 37 .5 39.5 41.5 43.5 45.5 Hips 39 41 43 46 48 50 52 54 56 Back Waist Length 17¼ 17⅜ 17½ 17⅝ 17¾ 17⅞ 18 [citation required] Half sizes 5'2"-5'3" (157.5-160 cm) tall, lower bust, shorter back Measurement/Height 10½ 12½ 14½ 16½ 18½ 20½ 22½ 24½ Chest 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 Waist 27 29 31 33 35 37½ 40 42½ Hip 35 37 39 41 43 45½ 48 50½ Back Waist Length 15 15¼ 15½ 15¾ 15⅞ 16 16⅛ 16¼ [citation required] Girls Sizes[ edit ] Girls Sizes Dimension/Height 7 8 10 12 14 16 Chest 25.5 26 28 30 32 34 Waist 22.5 23 24 25 26 27 Hip 26.5 27 29 31 33 35 Height 52 54 57 60 64 67 [citation required] Boy Sizes [ edit ] Boy sizes measure/height 7 8 10 12 14 18 20 22 chest 26 27 28 30 32 33½ 35 40 waist 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 hip 27 28 29½ 31 32½ 34 35½ 37 back neck 11¾ 12 12½ 14 1.1 50 54 58 61 64 66 68 [citation required] Children's sizes [ edit ] Kids Sizes Dimension/Height 1 2 3 4 5 6 6X Chest 18.5 20 20.5 21.5 22 23 Waist 17 18.5 19 20 20.5 21 21.5 Hips 19 20 21 22 23 24 24½ Height 31 34 37 40 43 46 48 back circumference 8½ 8½ 9½ 10 10½ 10¾ length of finished dress 17 18 19 20 22 24 25 [citation required] Baby sizes [ edit ] Infant Sizes Dimension/Size NB 0-3 Months 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 9-12 Months 18 Months 24 Months Weight 5-8lb 8-12½lb 12½-16½lb 16½-20½ 20½-24½lb 24½-27½lb 27½ -30 lb Height less than 21½ in 21½-24 in 24-26½ in 26½-28½ in 28½-30½ in 30½-32½ in 32½-34 in. [citation required] Toddler Sizes Measurement/Height 1/2 1 2 3 4 Chest 18.5 19 19.5 20 20.5 Waist 17 17.5 18 19.5 20 Height 28 31 34 37 40 Finished Dress Length 14 15 16 17 18 [citation required] Catalog size conversion [ edit ] Companies that publish catalogs may provide measurements for their sizes, which can vary even between different styles of the same type of garment. The sizes given in catalogs are generally approximately as follows: Ladies Catalog Sizes: 5'5"-5'6" (165-168 cm) Height, Average Chest, Average Back/Size 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Closest Standard Size 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Estimated Size . Height 162.5 cm (5 ft 4 in) 162.5 cm (5 ft 4 in) 164 cm (5 ft 4.5 in) 165 cm (5 ft 5 in) 162.5 cm (5 ft 4 in) 169 cm (5 ft 6.5 in) 5'6" (168 cm) 5'6" (168 cm) 5'6.5" (169 cm) Estimated Weight lb (kg) 115 (52) 125 (57) 135 (61 ) 145 (66) 155 (70) 165 (75) 175 (79) 180 (81.5) 195 (88.5) Bust 34 35 36 37 38.5 40 41.5 43 44.5 Waist 25 26 27 28 29.5 31 32.5 34 35.5 Hip 35.5 36.5 37.5 4 4 1.4 0 38.5 [citation required] Catalog Ladies Petite (half sizes): 5'1/2"-5'4" (153-162.5 cm) tall, lower bust, shorter back Dimension/Height 18W 20W 22W 24W 26W Closest standard size 12½ 14½ 16½ 18½ 20½ 22½ 24½ 26½ 28½ estimated height 153 cm (5 ft 1/2 in) 155 cm (5 ft 1 in) 156 cm (5 ft 1.5 in) 157.5 cm (5 ft 2 in) 159 cm (5 ft 2 in 5 inches) 160 cm (5 feet 3 inches). ) 5'3" (160 cm) 5'3.5" (161 cm) 5'4" (162.5 cm) Estimated Weight lb (kg) 125 (57) 140 (63.5) 155 (70) 170 (77) 180 ( 81 ,5) 190 (86) 215 (97.5) 225 (102) 235 (106.5) Bust 36 38 40 42 43.5 45.5 47.5 49.5 51.5 Waist 28 30 32 34 35 37 39 41 43 [citation required] Catalog Female Sizes: 5'5"-5'6.5" (165-169 cm) Height, Average Chest, Average Back Measurement/Size Closest Standard Size 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Est. Height 5'5" (165cm) 5'5.5" (166cm) 5'6" (168cm) 5'6" (168cm) 5'6.5" (169cm) 5'6.5" (169cm) 5 169 cm (6.5 in) 169 cm (5 ft 6.5 in) 169 cm (5 ft 6.5 in) Estimated weight kg (lb) 145 (66) 160 (72.5) 175 (79) 190 ( 86) 205 (93) 220 (100) 235 (106.5) 250 (113) 265 (120) Bust 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 Waist 30 32 34 35.5 37.5 39.5 41.5 43.5 45.5 hips 39 41 43 46 5.2 5 50 [citation required] Because the average American woman (age 20 and older) is about 63.8 inches, or about 5 feet 4 inches (162.1 cm) tall (Department of Health 2012), try both the standard and catalog size ranges, including variety of weights/physique to cater for the "below average size" woman with "petite" and "half sizes". However, taller than average women may be less likely to address their height by manufacturers and often face issues associated with slightly too short pant legs and sleeve cuffs and waist lengths. Defaults[ edit ] Current and previous national standards: ASTM D5585-95, 2001, Standard Chart of Body Measurements for Adult Females [5] ASTM D6829-02, 2008 Standard Charts of Body Measurements for Juniors ASTM D5585-11, 2011, Standard Charts of Body Measurements for Adult Female False Figures, Size Range 00-20 ASTM D6240-98, 2006, ASTM D6240-98 Standard Body Measurement Charts for Men's Sizes Thirty-Four to Sixty (34 to 60) ASTM D6458-99, 2006, Standard Charts of Body Measurements for Boys, Sizes 8 to 14 Slim and 8 to 20 Regular ASTM D6960-04, 2004, Standard Chart of Body Measurements Related to Plus Size Female Figures, Sizes 14W-32W CS-151-50 - Infant, baby, toddler and children's clothing CS-215-58, 1958 - Body measurements for sizing women's patterns and clothing PS 42-70, 1971 - women's clothing [2] PS 36-70 - boys' clothing PS 45-71 - Clothing for young men PS 54-72 - girls clothing See also[edit]

Convert percent to fraction in the simplest form.

Convert percent to the simplest form of a fraction.

Enter the percentage you want to convert to a fraction.

How do you convert percent to fractions?

To convert percent to fractions:

Percent means “per hundred”, so let’s say 5% is the same as 5/100.

58% is like 58/100 or simplified 29/50.

Simplest Form Calculator – Simplify a fraction to its most reduced form.

FAQs 59% broken?

1. How do you convert 59% to fractions?

You can convert 59% to a fraction simply by placing the percentage above 100, i.e. H. 59/100

2. What is 59% in fractional form?

59% in the fractional form is 59/100. You can simplify it further than 59/100 if you want.

3. Where can I get a step-by-step guide to converting 59% to fractions?

On our page you will find a step-by-step guide to convert 59% to fractions.

While wearing your bra, measure your rib cage just below your bust to get your BAND SIZE.

2

Stationery, gifts and clothing at student-friendly prices

The official point of sale for Imperial College London merchandise

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Unconventional sizes can be confusing for plus size and curvy people as they are often lumped together. You might mistake yourself for being plus size if you’re just curvy. But if regular “big” clothes don’t fit you, 1X and XL both can get the job done.

Is XL the same size as 1X? XL and 1X are not the same size but may overlap at 36″ waist. Otherwise, XL is smaller than 1X. 1X is used in women’s clothing as a size equivalent to XL and some XXL men’s clothing. Before purchasing 1X or XL clothing, please check the brand’s own size chart to ensure the item fits.

In this article, you’ll learn about the differences between XL and 1X clothing and the best practices for buying unconventionally sized clothes and getting them to fit you perfectly the first time. So let’s start.

What is the difference between XL and 1X?

Sizes for tall boys and plus size girls can be confusing. And that’s just clothing, let’s not even talk about men’s underwear, bras or shapewear. It’s hard enough finding clothes that fit, why do you have to confuse me with the size?!

The main difference between 1X and XL is that 1X is used for women’s size charts while XL is used for men’s size charts. 1X is short for 1XL, omitting the L on the belief that it would offend some customers.

Women who don’t see the L as inherently negative call it 1XL, or simply XL. But before you take that as a signal to order everything 1X because XL clothes fit you, you need to pay attention to the brand-specific sizing.

If you are about to buy a 1X size item from one brand while you normally buy XL clothing from another brand, you may receive something that is too tight or too loose for your body. XL is used in unisex clothing, although it is primarily a men’s size. It is also used in some women’s clothing items.

The commonly cited Groupon size chart, which represents the size norms for women’s clothing brands in America, shows that the 1X size includes a 36-inch waist. But it also includes waist sizes from 38 to 40 inches in the 1X category.

According to the men’s size chart from the same source, the XL size corresponds to a 35-36 inch waist. At 36 inches, the sizes overlap. Otherwise, XL is usually smaller than 1X.

And according to another Imperial College Union size chart, XL starts at an even lower waist size of 34 inches. This underscores the importance of checking brand-specific sizing and corresponding waist sizes before purchasing an XL or 1X item.

Usually XL has a more unreliable size range than 1X clothing. Brands sensitive enough to use the 1X size title are more detail oriented. The XL size term, on the other hand, is used by any brand that makes clothing larger than the standard L size.

Should you buy 1X or XL clothes?

If you are a male customer, do not have access to the size chart which includes 1X, leaving only XL clothes. But if you are a customer you might be able to choose between XL and 1X clothes, albeit from different brands.

It would be better to go for 1X clothes wherever size is available as it is more consistent than XL clothes across several brands. To ensure your choice fits you well, you should also ask for the brand’s sizing chart.

The size chart is available online for digital native brands and can be accessed by the store manager when making a physical purchase in a store. This little job will set you apart from the customers who regret buying clothes from brands with inconsistent sizes.

4 best practices for buying XL or 1X clothing

When you buy 1X or XL clothes for the first time, some common mistakes can cause inconvenience and leave you with clothes that don’t fit.

Here are a few things you can do to ensure your clothes live up to your expectations.

1. Check the return policy

When buying XL or 1X clothes, it is best to pay attention to a good return policy.

Body positive apparel brands understand that their customers are dealing with non-standard sizing and offer a solution to misjudgment. A good return policy offers a refund or exchange coupon, no questions asked.

2. Try an equivalent item

When shopping in a physical store, there may be times when the product you are trying to size test is sealed in unbreakable packaging. Let’s say you want to buy a cotton button-up, but it is packed in a sealed cardboard box.

While you can see the color of the shirt, you can’t try it on without breaking the seal. In this case, the store will ask you to buy it. Before you decide to buy it boxed, you can ask the staff to give you “a shirt of the same size” to try on.

Say something like this:

“Hey, I don’t want to open this box. Can you give me something the same size so I can try and test the size?”

Most clothing store associates will understand what you mean before beginning the second sentence and will comply with your request.

3. Buy an item first (when buying online)

If you’re not shopping in a physical store, you don’t have the luxury of trying on outfits before you buy them. In this case, buying more than one piece of clothing of any kind is risky. It is better to buy an item and try it before buying other similar items.

4. Don’t assume consistency

After all, you can never assume one size fits all, even within the same store.

Different brands have different sizing charts, and if you test a brand’s 1X shirt and it fits, you may incorrectly receive 1X shirts from multiple brands. This can cause some shirts to not fit well.

I personally wear XL on some brands and 2XL or even 3XL on others depending on the fit.

Always take a test product or try a product of your specific size from each brand before trusting it enough to get multiple items.

Summary: Is 1X the same as XL?

XL is not the same as 1X except in rare cases.

In men’s clothing, XL refers to clothing that is slightly larger than the standard L size. These items of clothing are still in the L category for women’s clothing.

Where XL clothing for men ends, 1X clothing begins. The largest XL shirt is often the same size as the smallest 1X shirt.

paige

Paige is 5’9 and normally wears a size 4XL. You see them in dress sizes from 24 to 32 depending on the brand, stretch and style.

Cat

Cat is 5’7 and wears size 2XL or 3XL. They wear dress sizes from 18 to 24, occasionally also 4XL.

jennifer

Jen is 5’7 and wears size 1XL or 2XL. You will see them in sizes 12-20.