Best Drag Flicking Stick? Trust The Answer

• Dragonfly Gecko Field Hockey Stick (Blue, 26 Inches) …
• STX Field Hockey Rookie Starter Pack with 2See-S Goggles 32″ …
• Mazon Fusion 500 Field Hockey Stick (Aqua, 36.5) …
• Dragonfly Gecko Field Hockey Stick (Purple/Pink, 34 Inches)

The average field hockey player has a strong side (right side) and a weak side (left side). By learning to master weak side shots, you’ll give yourself and your team an edge. Below are two shots we teach at our intermediate to advanced field hockey camps that will give you an edge over your competition.

The shovel

The scoop is an air pass to dribbling from the left side of the field. It is used to elevate the ball over an opposing player so you can center the ball, or as an elevated shot at goal.

To score a scoop shot, grab the racquet in a simple grip, rotating the racquet 180 degrees above the ball into an inverted racquet position. Hold the ball level with your front foot and place the racquet under the ball. Lift up with your right hand and push down with your left hand. Remember, no backswing with the scoop shot.

The Backstroke (Drive)

The backstroke is used to score goals. By getting stronger on your weak side, your opponent will be unable to defend you, potentially giving you time to score. The goalie may also be set on a forehand shot and only need to read, giving you a small window of opportunity to shoot and score.

To successfully perform a backswing, grip the stick like you would a frying pan. Align your body parallel to the target you want to shoot at and make sure the ball is away from your right root. On the backstroke, the club should be in contact with the ground at all times and the backswing should be short. Strike the center of the ball with the toe edge of the racquet for maximum power.

the chips

The chip shot is used when a player is forced to the sidelines. Typically, a defender will push the offensive player’s weak side to make it more difficult to score. When in this position for the chip, make sure your kicking foot is in line with the ball and goal. Make a quick backswing and hit the ball with the edge of your racquet.

Mastering these shots will make you a versatile field hockey player, capable of playing on both sides of the field. Check out more tips and improve your skills at a Nike Field Hockey Camp this summer.

Adidas has emerged as the most used racquet by international players in 2016, with around 24% favoring the brand, with gray standing out next, and in particular the GX7000 is the most used model by professional midfielders. Kookaburra, Ritual, and Osaka were also commonly used and are all known to be reliable all-round sticks. Each of these brands mentioned has a wide range of quality racquets that cater to the needs of midfielders, so it’s no wonder they are popular. In this case you still need to choose the right stick after deciding on the brand and the comments below are a good guide to help you.

Your job as a midfielder is to build the game up front. That means controlling the ball and getting it safely to the attackers. However, you can also push forward into the D at some points to score as well, very possible if you have a short corner. On defence, your job is to stop opposing midfielders and the forwards do the same, meaning you lay down some good tackles and traps.

adidas LX Compo 1 field hockey stick Pure steering head shape for ultimate control in all situations. Improved surface compared to classic head shapes

Carbon plate stiffening technology for a better connection and more integrated rigidity to increase punching power

The trapezoidal racquet shape reduces the weight of the racquet and improves 3D capabilities

adigrip tape that combines traditional PU with a leather-like feel.

70% carbon and center bow

GRAYS GR7000 Ultrabow Field Hockey Stick Bundle with Free Chamois Grip LIGHT: Graphene is strong and light and has been precisely combined with the highly successful GX composition to forge GR Technology

EXCEPTIONALLY STRONG: By combining graphene in the composite matrix, players have all the durability and playability of GX technology with the added power and feel of graphene. GR Series racquets offer exceptional feel, power and playability

MEDIUM BOW: The GR7000 Ultrabow has our straightest bow profile. This gives a natural shot angle for executing the game’s core skills

POWER & CONTROL: Graphene offers a unique combination of strong energy transfer and shock absorbing properties. Power and control perfectly balanced

Free chamois handle included!

Here are some things to consider:

Weight: Mid range is preferred, but most midfielders aren’t super light like a forward racquet as you want something solid in your hands for tackles. But not too heavy like a defensive racquet as you need to dribble fast and you want your racquet to be agile.

: Mid range is preferred but most midfielders are not super light like a forward racquet as you want something solid in your hands for tackles. But not too heavy like a defensive racquet as you need to dribble fast and you want your racquet to be agile. Toe: The most common and popular toe shape for midfielders is the midi toe, it is well balanced and good for all round ability. It offers a decently large hitting area and makes working with the reverse side stick easier.

: The most common and popular toe shape for midfielders is the midi toe, it is well balanced and good for all round ability. It offers a decently large hitting area and makes working with the reverse side stick easier. Control: You will want a racquet that allows for good control when dropping and dribbling. So a super high carbon stick (like 95%+) might not be ideal. A bit of Kevlar (aramid) helps with that.

: You will want a racquet that allows good control when dropping and dribbling. So a super high carbon stick (like 95%+) might not be ideal. A bit of Kevlar (aramid) helps with that. Bow: Many professional midfielders don’t like a massive 24 or 25mm bow as while it can be good for drag flicks or overheads, it doesn’t make set hits or traps that much easier. However, a medium-sized bow can help with racquet work, so a bow between 19 and 23mm is always good, depending on your playing style.

Hopefully these features will help you decide which racquet is best for you as a midfielder. In summary, while you really want a good all-round racquet, a midfielder is both an attacking and defensive position and focuses on precision and passing skills rather than shooting or 1v1 skills.

Early hockey sticks made in England.

In field hockey, each player carries a stick and cannot participate in the game without it. The stick for an adult is usually between 89 and 95 cm long. As of 2015, a maximum length of 105cm (41.3″) was mandated.[1] The maximum allowable weight is 737 grams.[2] The majority of players use a racquet in the 19oz to 22oz (538g – 623 g. ). Traditionally, hockey sticks were made from hickory, ash or mulberry wood, with the head of the stick being hand carved and therefore requiring skilled craftsmen to make it. Sticks made from wood continue to be made, but the higher quality sticks are now being made from composite materials manufactured for the first time after 1992. These poles usually contain a combination of fiberglass, aramid fiber and carbon fiber in varying proportions depending on the properties required (flexibility; stiffness; impact and abrasion resistance).

Early rules[ edit ]

Parts of the hockey stick.

After centuries of different variations of field hockey (including a version in England sometime before 1860 which used a rubber dice rather than a ball because of the very hilly moorland where it was played), the game became more organized and regulated.

When a federation of clubs was formed in 1886 and the game became more standardized, the modern game as we know it began (and a white-lacquered cricket ball had become the standard object). The game by this point had also split into different branches, which developed as separate sports. Shinty, a game popular in Scotland, uses both sides of a round stick with a curved end shaped like a walking stick; The Irish game, hurling, uses both sides of a stick that is flat on both sides and shaped similarly to a hook with an axe-like handle. Bandy also uses both sides of the stick. It was initially called “Hockey on Ice” because it was considered a variant of ice hockey. The bat in England evolved, possibly because of the close association with it by cricketers, with a bat having only one flat playing side, the left side, under a rounded grip area – using the right side, which is rounded, prohibited – a curiosity, which had a profound influence on the later development of the hockey stick and the game itself.

There were only three parts of a hockey stick ever mentioned in the rules: the head, the handle, and the splice. Originally (until 2004) the handle was the part above the bottom of the splice and the head was the part under the bottom of the splice. Other common terms include “grip”, which refers to the part of the racquet that is held, specifically the area held with two hands when hitting the ball. Most sticks have a round handle covered with a non-slip, sweat-absorbing textile strap. The grip remains rounded on the back, back or right hand side, but gradually flattens out on the “front” and also gets wider, changing from a diameter of around 30mm to a flat width of around 46mm (the maximum allowed was 2 inches – now 51 mm). This flat area above the curve of the head is commonly referred to as the “shank”. The head of the stick is generally thought of as the curved part. The right side is called the face, the bump the “toe” and the curve of the head where it meets the shaft the “heel”. In recent times it has been permitted to use the edges of the racquet (as well as the clubface) to hit the ball and therefore “forehand edging” and “backhand edging” will be found in the rules terminology. Forehand and backstroke refer to executing these strikes from the right and left sides of the body, respectively, as the racquet can be used face-up or face-down to perform an edge strike using the two edges of the stick are not named separately, but simply referred to as edges.

Originally, the hockey stick had six rule requirements:

The racquet had to be flat on the playing side (the left side when the toe of the racquet head is pointing away from the user).

It had to be able to go all the way through a two inch (inside diameter) ring.

The stick should be smooth (no rough or sharp edges).

The stick head should be a) curved and b) made of wood.

curved and made of wood. A maximum and minimum weight has been specified, 28 oz and 12 oz respectively.

Field hockey developed in England during the 19th century. This development led to the formation of the Federation Internationale de Hockey (FIH) in 1924.

Contance Applebee is responsible for introducing field hockey to the United States in 1901. The United States Field Hockey Association was formed in 1922.

In 1908, men’s field hockey was introduced to the Olympic Games. Women’s field hockey was first recognized at the 1980 Olympics.

The World Championship is the pinnacle of international field hockey. The World Championship takes place every four years and 12 men’s and 12 women’s teams compete for the world championship title.

head length [edit]

Inverted head in various positions against a stick holding forehand.

Hockey Stick Head Overlays

The extreme with short heads

The first major developments in what later came to be known as “English style” racquets (and the method of playing with such racquets) took place in India. (The game in its modern form was apparently brought to India by the British Army, although there seems to be no concrete evidence of this. But certainly hockey was played by the British Armed Forces in India.) At that time the stick head was very long (more than 300mm) and made from a native British wood, Ash. The Indians then made sticks with a much shorter head length and a tighter heel bend, and used mulberry, which is harder than ash but has similar flex characteristics and weight and is easily machined. This development changed the nature of the game, giving rise to ‘Indian dribbling ” and on the Indian dominance of the game in the first half of the 20th century.

A hockey stick is occasionally used in the vertical position shown, but controlled manipulation of the movement and direction of the ball (dribbling) is performed in what is known as a “dribble crouch” when the stick’s grip is typically between 35° and 55° be angled. Hitting or jabbing the ball can be done with the racquet at any angle between vertical and horizontal, and recent rule changes allow even the edges of the racquet to be used to sweep or hit the ball on the ground. The different club head designs can be compared in that they differ in the execution of Indian dribbling at a grip angle of 45°, i. in front of the ball instead of (or also) around the back of the ball (English dribbling). The multi-layered barhead diagram shows the changes in head shape and length that have occurred over approximately thirty years.

The earliest trend was shortening of the stick head. While this reduced the gripping area of ​​the head, it was beneficial because the rules of the time allowed only one side of the club head to be used (back then, the ball could not be played with the edges of the head or handle). but only with the flat side or the front side).

Using extreme examples is useful to demonstrate effects that occur in less extreme configurations but are much more difficult to see and therefore explain. The first observation is simple (upper left of image captioned “Inverted head in different…”). When the racquet head is rotated to the back (lighter color) the tip does not disappear into the ground to allow the back of the racquet to be presented to the ball – vertical adjustment is required. Second (above right), when the grip of the racquet is held at the exact same angle and rotated, a horizontal adjustment is required to bring the inverted head into a position to make contact with the ball. The third image (bottom left) shows that these adjustments have been made (and a change in the angle of the grip, as the position of the hand holding the stick would be roughly the same above as gripping the stick in the forehand position), but the contact area of ​​the racquet head with the ball is very small; therefore the control may not be sufficient. The fourth figure (below right) shows that in order to get good contact with the ball over a larger area of ​​the inverted head, it is necessary to move the grip much closer to the vertical. This means the player has to get the ball very close to their feet and get into a more upright dribbling position – this in turn affects the ability to scan the field while keeping the ball in peripheral vision – a significant disadvantage when dribbling opponents to dodge.

Although the long headstock was an appropriate form for a style of dribbling based on moving the ball forward just behind the ball; and directional changes could be achieved by rotating the racquet around the back of the ball and/or moving the feet to either side of the ball, it was not as easy to use the long racquet head to get the ball over the feet and back again, especially when placed far to the left of the player’s feet. (This left-hand position was complicated by a very strict interpretation of “obstacle” which prohibited shielding the ball from an opponent. The game was also considered “right-handed” at the time, positioning the body between the ball and a close or close opponent approaching from the right side was not allowed.) Reverse hitting, pushing, and flicking of the club would be a short-range ability and difficult, if at all, to execute accurately, especially when moving at high speed.

Over many years, stick heads gradually became shorter and the “heel” more tightly curved. This process continued until the “one-piece” head could not be made to bend more sharply without splitting the wood on the base. As it was, attempts to have the grain follow exactly the same curve as the bend, as it should for maximum strength (this is why the wood is bent rather than cut to shape), were abandoned by some manufacturers, and one Upward movement of the tip was sometimes accomplished by cutting across the wood grain at the toe end of the head to achieve the desired shape. Some manufacturers resorted to gluing a separate piece of wood to the toe, or gluing additional strips of wood to the inside edge of the grip above the head to create the effect of a tighter heel bend. (“Head adjustment” was often done to update old stock or when using unmodified presses.).

Some players cut part of the toe off their sticks to achieve a shorter head and rounded the end (although in the older styles this did nothing to tighten the bend to the heel and often just ruined the stick) . Predictably, for the 1986 World Cup, racquets were produced with heads as short as 95mm horizontally. The internationals to whom they were given tried them on and then sent them back as unusable.

The difficulty was twofold: 1) the tip was so short that it could not be rotated completely around the top perimeter of the ball, and 2) when the clubhead was played around the back of the ball, it “walked off” because there was insufficient “barrel length” to the embroidery head. For example, if a player “crabs” the ball while moving in a dribbling crouch (placing the clubhead across the front of the ball), pulls the ball back to his feet, and then wraps the clubhead around the back of the ball around him back forward and maybe moving the ball in a different direction (a common move), the margin of error was so small that the ball could easily slip off the clubhead. The ultra-short stick head was based to some extent on the idea that the new artificial surfaces would lead to a style of hockey based on stopping the ball with the grip of the stick almost horizontal to the ground and dribbling to avoid opponents almost eliminated with almost continuous passing of the ball. Although there was a development of “systems hockey” that overcame the deficiencies in European stick/ball skills compared to India and Pakistan at the time, it was not as fluid as the one-and-two common in football -Touch passing and so on Ideal was (and is) a long way off.

The hook[edit]

“Hook”, made by Grays circa 1986

In 1982, a Dutch inventor, Toon Coolen, patented a hockey stick with a “hook” head. Hockey stick manufacturer Grays picked up the design in 1983 and the first mass-produced hockey sticks with laminated wood heads were made in Pakistan. This new design was made possible by the development of epoxy resin adhesives that did not require perfectly dry wood to be glued and cured to a strength that could withstand the immense stresses placed on a stick head when a hockey ball is hit with it.

By 1993 the “Hook” patent was decided (after a court case in Germany) to only allow hook shapes within 20° of the vaguely spelled “almost 180°” (referring to the degree of upward movement of the toe in relation to the shaft of the stick in the Patent description; the shaft of the grip described is bent “almost 180°” to form the hook shape of the head of the stick). This paved the way for the appearance of more J-shaped clubheads and the gradual transformation of the “midi” shape into the hook shape. A patent application filed in Pakistan in 1987 by Martin Conlon for a kinked shaft hockey stick with a set-back head (which was also hooked but not “nearly 180°”) also saw strong opposition in Pakistan that year. (Indian and UK patents were granted in 1988, although the UK patent application was also opposed by the same company). Mr Conlon designed and imported the first J-Head sticks to the UK in 1990 but prior to the 1993 decision other dealers and manufacturers had been very reluctant to order or produce hook sticks of any kind due to uncertainties and the strength of the patent covering the hook- Hockey stick “fenced”.

The “midi” head[ edit ]

Comparison of “one-piece” and “midi” style embroidery heads

Comparison of the horizontal head length of “Haken” and a standard short head stick

“English” stick head and the “Ultra Short”

The death knell of the ultra-short head was rung in 1986 with the introduction of the laminated midi batter shape; although of course many players continued to use “one piece” short head racquets for many years after that date and many thousands more were made. The reason for the continued use of the one-piece racquet was that the midi length was similar to that of the more popular one-piece racquet heads that had been around for about a decade. Some one-piece constructions were still made on presses on which the central protrusion had not been modified and the heel flex was “slower” than the production of the more aware manufacturers, but the “moving on” manufacturers produced a one-piece that featured the laminated midi could definitely keep up – at least as far as the game functionality is concerned.

The biggest casualty of the Midi was the patented hook made by the same company. It had not caught on in the British culture of the short-headed stick and for a few years after the introduction of the midi the hook was seen as something of a novelty, even as an indoor stick or as a goalie-only stick. In fact, versions of these were made specifically for goalies, with a very extended toe (6 inches – 150mm or more) and this development continued until some were made with the toe extending almost the length of the grip and the FIH stepped in and decided that the vertical track limit should be 100 mm in the future.

The hook was 124 mm long measured horizontally across the face of the embroidery head when the handle was held vertically; the midi was 113mm; many one-piece heads between 110mm and 115mm and the useless ultra short 94mm. A difference of just 30mm between the head length of a racquet that was considered sluggish (although the hook was also the height of the toe, causing a sense of imbalance) and a racquet that was considered too short to play easily . There were still many players who were quite happy playing with a 175mm (7″) head length racquet, but players buying new racquets were now aware of fairly subtle differences in racquet feel and feel due to length, shape and distribution performance aware of head weight – not just the overall weight in ounces and the stick’s “swing weight or balance” – and for the first time, in the years after 1986, a wide range of hockey sticks were offered by a greatly increased number of manufacturers, from which they can choose what suits them. After the introduction of laminations, some brands offered up to ten different shapes or styles of club heads on the traditional shaft. The introduction of composite materials would further complicate the picture.

In the early 1990’s there was a staggering number and variety of hockey sticks on sale compared to what was available ten years earlier. By 1992, hockey stick reinforcement was a major concern, and composites entered an (extended) FIH trial period (there were major concerns about the performance generated by these new reinforcements and player safety). There were also hockey sticks with metal handles and inserted plywood heads (manufactured by the American company Eastons, better known for making baseball bats), as well as the wide range of one-piece headsticks that are still made, and a growing range of laminated midi and laminated short hairstyles . The metal-handled sticks were later banned for “safety reasons”, which was widely seen by the FIH as a political move.

Heel Bend, Ball Position, Hitting & Stopping [ edit ]

It can be seen from the diagram above that no matter how “tight” the heel bend, reversing the stick head over the ball with a “traditional” hockey stick head always requires both vertical and horizontal adjustment of stick head position. This isn’t nearly as difficult as the very long headstick and this type of adjustment will be almost subconscious to a seasoned player. Also note that if the shaft is held vertical, the ball will be stopped more securely on the toe side of the shaft than in the center of the shaft when it is on the ground. Beginners often assume that the center of the ball will be in line with the center of the shaft when the ball is stopped in this manner, and as a result the ball will be deflected to the heel side and usually into their feet. Because of the heel tilt at the clubhead, the vertical shaft stop is actually much easier to execute safely (when the ball is on the ground) when the grip is held at least 10° from vertical, with the top of the grip tilted to the player’s left. When the ball is in the air, slightly off the ground, say below knee height, it is often easier to catch the ball properly if the grip is vertical.

One of the side effects of the modern racquet’s tighter heel bend is an increase in the distance of play with the optimal hitting or stopping portion of the racquet’s head when used within the normal range of playing angles. Held parallel, the distance between the curvature of the base of the stick head and the top of the grip is the same for the two racquets pictured. At an angle of 45°, as shown, there is a difference of approx. 3 cm.

Tighter bend for greater hitting and stopping distance

Ball in the center of the long head and ball at the front of the modern hook

The positioning of the ball’s midsurface on the modern racquet’s racquet head, compared to the midsurface position on the longer racquet, also brings the center of the ball much closer to a line projected through the center of the grip and the perimeter closer to the back edge of the racquet, which is a allows for better ball control.

“English” style staff held vertically

After looking at the illustration of the English style hockey stick, it becomes clear that it would not be easy to stop a ball on the ground with the grip held vertically. If the ball is centered with the center of the handle (red), it would likely deflect off the heel side of the head. Even with the bullet (blue) positioned centrally to the head, stopping with an upright grip would not have been very safe.

Stop and hit with the “English” head

Presenting the racquet at an angle of 35° or more (40° in the figure) solves the problem of the ball running off the head by presenting a very long area behind the ball (relative to the width of the ball), but that Problem represents the best or optimal position to stop the ball for the following action. For hitting, the optimal positions seem to be where a line projected through the leading edge of the grip’s shaft passes through the center of the ball, as this is the position closest to the center line of the grip where the full width of the head is behind the ball. Stopping the ball closer to the tip of the racquet is acceptable but not optimal as it requires time-consuming adjustment before the next intended action.

stopping and hitting

In the modern racquet, the vertical grip position is still not as secure as an angled grip presentation, but the angle can now be significantly less due to the tighter heel flex, and the ball’s stopping and hitting positions are easier to determine. The line of the leading edge of the grip still protrudes near the center of the ball when the racquet grip angle is in the 30°–50° range, and a line through the center of the grip protrudes backwards and down the ball.

Reset Heads, Ball Position & Stopping[ edit ]

Vertical Hold Set-back on Hook

Ball positions on club heads between “slow heel” and “set-back”.

The figure titled “Stopping and Hitting” shows that when a vertical racquet shaft is centered on the ball of the foot, part of the ball protrudes to the heel side, this would happen even if the heel did not bend but a 90° -Corner would be The only way to cover the entire ball with the shaft held vertically is to use a recessed head – that is a head set back towards the heel side of the shaft.

A racquet with a recessed head and toe protrusion, with the grip positioned vertically, covers significantly more of the ball and can reduce deflection errors when stopping from the heel. Using the recessed head in the more comfortable or natural holding angle places a vertical portion of the shaft over the ball while also aligning the center ball and a line projected through the center of the handle.

In the upright striking position, which is generally between 15° and 25° from vertical, the heel flex of the 1970s Indian Stick covers the entire ball. As the heel flex tightened in the 1980s and 1990s, the ball became closer to centerline of the club, but it is not until the setback stick appears that the center of the shaft is aligned (or nearly so) with the center of the ball. The ball appears to move back along the length of the various clubheads as the heads become shorter and the heel tightens, in fact the playing position of the ball gets further and further away from the feet as the playing distance increases.

Setback head with no shaft protrusion on the conventional head.

Setback comparison of “Recurve” and “Kinked Shaft” sticks

There are currently two types of outfield setback rackets, the degree of setback to the head is a feature they share; They differ in that one has a “kink” or shank protrusion on the toe side above the head of the stick while the other does not. In the goalie versions, some also have the tip of the head cut flat (parallel to the grip) rather than rounded to allow the user to present the racquet closer to the ground when stopping in a horizontal position on the back, this is more easy to prevent the ball under the grip of the racquet.

The modern hook[edit]

In the mid ’90s the ‘hook’ head style hockey stick was relaunched, this time by former Germany U21 international Thomas Kille. Bright colors, bold graphics, and painted heads have been introduced. Manufacturers paid much more attention to the appearance of their products and sold hockey sticks, especially to new players, as much color and fashion as they did strength and ease of use.

Comparison of original hook shapes with modern designs.

Today many brands have a choice of hook up angles of 45°, 60° and 75°. A stick style that almost nobody in Europe wanted to use in 1987 is now used almost everywhere; It is now difficult to find a player who does not use a hook style hockey stick, and many of them have never used the “shortie” style at all. Just as many players today have never played hockey on a natural grass field, the development of artificial surfaces has also had a significant impact on the way hockey sticks are used.

The original version, the “hook,” relied on a patent specification that placed the inside lateral edge of the toe parallel (or nearly parallel) to the opposite edge of the handle. The vertical height of the tip was about 80mm (dashed line) Figure 1 and it was of almost uniform thickness with the rest of the stick head.

Early modification Fig. 1 reduced the horizontal head length to about 115 mm and the “toe height” to about 75 mm. A hockey ball is between about 71mm and 75mm in diameter (224-235mm circumference) – so the “toe height” is brought to the same height as the maximum height of the ball. This is a common feature in today’s hook head designs, the tip generally varies in height between the minimum and maximum height of the ball when the handle is in a vertical position.

The next development was a hook with a tip with an inside edge slanted about 30° away from the handle (a 60° angle to the ground, or 150° “upswing”). The “tip height” was 75mm. (Modern Versions Fig. 2 vary between 70mm and 75mm in tip height.) The horizontal length of the head was based on the length of the ‘standard’ short-headed one-piece stick, approximately 110mm, and modern versions appear to vary between 110mm and 115 mm. In the mid 1990’s more ‘open’ hooks were introduced, Fig. 3, some at 45°, and a marked increase in horizontal head length, some up to 120 mm.

New names have been coined to describe the different hook shapes, but there is much confusion and overlapping of names. “Maxi” and “mega” are also terms for hook-shaped styles, but there is no common agreement on what these terms mean outside of the particular “brands” that use them: what one brand calls a midi, another calls a ” Hook”. There are basically three types of hooks. The nearly symmetrical “U”, a “tight” or “closed” toe shape between 60° and 75°, and an “open” shape of 45°-55°. Where the toe is shorter, the same toe angles are commonly referred to as midi.

Recessed embroidery heads [ edit ]

The curve to the heel side of the grip

Auch der großköpfige „Hook“ litt kurzzeitig unter dem Erscheinen der ersten Stöcke mit zurückversetzten Köpfen bei der WM 1986. Es gab keine signifikanten Auswirkungen, aber es (und andere) trug zur allgemeinen Verwirrung bei, da anscheinend „jeder und sein Hund“ neue Ideen in der Kopfform präsentierten. (Schläger mit Metallgriff und vollständig zusammengesetzte Schläger waren noch nicht in Erscheinung getreten, also ging es zu der Zeit eher um Kopfform und -länge als um Materialien und in geringerem Maße, da Eishockeyspieler zu dieser Zeit eher „traditionalistisch“ waren. die Kopf/Griff-Konfiguration, auch die Verstärkung mit GFK und Kohlefaser war später nicht das Thema.

Bei einem von AREC für den französischen Erfinder Jean Capét hergestellten Hockeyschläger war die Mitte des Griffs auf die Mitte der horizontalen Länge des Kopfes ausgerichtet. Es gab eine Menge Werbung, die auf dem „Rotationsgleichgewicht“, dem „Sweet Spot“ und dem „Power Hitting“ basierte. Der ‘Hook’ fühlte sich sicherlich aus dem Rotationsgleichgewicht heraus, besonders für diejenigen, die mit Stöcken mit kurzem Kopf gespielt hatten, die mit einer sehr dünnen Spitze hergestellt wurden, um das Gewicht des Kopfes näher am Schaft zu konzentrieren.

Das Ausrichten der Mitte des Griffs mit der Mitte der horizontalen Länge eines Kurzkopfs und nicht mit der Mitte des Balls führte zu einigen ungewöhnlichen Spieleigenschaften, zum Beispiel, dass die Ballposition des umgekehrten Schlägers weiter von den Füßen entfernt ist als die Vorhand Kugelposition, was das Gegenteil von dem ist, was bei einer herkömmlichen “traditionellen” Griffkopfkonfiguration passiert. (Wenn die Mittellinie des Griffs auf die Mitte des Balls ausgerichtet ist – oder fast so – gibt es keinen oder nur einen sehr geringen Unterschied in der Ballposition in Bezug auf den Schläger oder die Füße des Spielers zwischen der Vorhand- und der Rückwärtsspielposition. )

Der AREC-Schläger wurde ursprünglich ohne deutlich nach oben gebogene Spitze hergestellt und hatte eine kurze horizontale Länge (ca. 105 mm), in dieser Hinsicht ähnelte er den damaligen Standardschlägern mit kurzem Kopf. Das Fehlen eines umgedrehten Zehs in Kombination mit der ungewöhnlichen umgekehrten Ballposition verursachte einige Schwierigkeiten bei der Anpassung an den Schläger und als die horizontalen Kopflängen der Schläger auf vielfachen Wunsch länger gemacht wurden. Ein Schläger, bei dem der Griff auf die Mitte der Kopflänge ausgerichtet war, war für das Hockeyspielen nicht mehr praktikabel. Die Herstellung als Außenfeldschläger wurde Anfang der 1990er Jahre eingestellt, wahrscheinlich bis 1992, aber ähnliche Schläger anderer Hersteller sind für Torhüter erschienen.

Kinked-Shaft & Recurve-Köpfe [ bearbeiten ]

Der traditionelle kleine Bogen zur Fersenkante des Hockeyschlägers bewirkte, dass der Schlägerkopf leicht nach hinten versetzt wurde. Dieser Aspekt des Schlägerdesigns (für das der AREC-Hockeyschläger ein extremes Beispiel war) wurde erstmals kurz vor der Herren-Hockey-Weltmeisterschaft 1986 untersucht und führte zur Herstellung von Hockeyschlägern mit einem Schlägerkopf, der im Vergleich zu wesentlich zurückversetzter war der Griff. Das ursprüngliche Design, bei dem die Mittellinie des Griffs mit der Mitte des Balls in der üblichen Schlagposition ausgerichtet war, wies einen ausgleichenden “Knick” oder Vorsprung zum Griff an der Zehenkante des Griffs direkt über dem Kopf des Stocks auf . Diese Erfindung des Schlägers mit geknicktem Schaft und zurückgesetztem Kopf führte direkt zu Regeln, die das Ausmaß der Biegung oder “zulässigen Abweichung” zu den “Kantenseiten” des Hockeyschlägergriffs regeln. Einige davon wurden später als “Recurve”-Köpfe bezeichnet (eine Beschreibung für einen späteren Stil, der von einem australischen Hersteller ohne die patentierte Knickfunktion hergestellt wurde).

Die Extreme

The early extremes in stick design were in those sticks intended for use by goalkeepers. The aim was simply to present the maximum stopping area to the ball. The first was the extended hook (far left), which was made with a toe of approximately 150 mm (6 in). When sticks with an upturn substantially more than that (some more than half the length of the handle) began to appear, which was around 1988, the FIH placed a limit of 100 mm (4″) on the upturn of the toe of the head.

In 1990 a plywood cutout of a stick with multiple kinks in the shaft was presented to the FIH for comment, the intention was to produce it as a goalkeeper’s stick. Having limited the toe upturn only two years previously the FIH saw this as mockery and issued a press release, in April 1990, proposing a ban on all hockey sticks with “non-straight” handles to take effect after the Barcelona Olympics of that year. There was protest from those who had been marketing sticks with set-back heads and or kinked shafts and it was in any case not a sensible proposal because there is no such thing as a hockey stick with a perfectly straight handle. The result was the withdrawal of the proposed ban and the imposition of “limits of deviation”, which permitted one bend to either side of the handle to a maximum of 20 mm on each side. In 2000 a diagram explaining the permitted deviation was included in the Rules of Hockey. Previously the only restraint on the configuration of a hockey stick was that it had to pass through a ring of 2″ diameter (later adjusted to 51 mm—2 in rounded up to the nearest millimeter).

Permitted deviation [ edit ]

Although permitted deviation (from the straight) to the edges of a hockey stick (handle) were included in the 1991 Rules of Hockey, a diagram of a hockey stick, to illustrate what was permitted was not included until 2000 and then it was a part stick diagram placed horizontally on a page smaller than the A6 page of the present rulebook. The diagram was very poorly drawn but it was a significant step for the FIH to include it at all. The diagram remained unchanged until 2004, when the orientation was altered so that the stick was shown upright and it was also shown full length. The x-axis (previously vertical) became the ground plane and the y-axis a vertical line through the centre of the handle. Further improvements to the diagram (particularly the drawing of the representation of the stick and an illustration of possible curves to the handle) were made in 2006 and a second diagram, detailing head configuration, was added.

Limits of deviation with sample of an actual stick superimposed in green.

Limits of deviation, sample curves.

To describe the dimensions of head and handle the hockey stick is envisaged to be placed with the bottom curve of the stick head on a level surface, the x-axis, with the stick-handle perpendicular to it (the y-axis). The y-axis runs from an intersection with the x-axis (0) vertically through the midpoint of the top of the handle. The Head is the part from the x-axis to the line C-C (diagram) a vertical distance of 100 mm. This line C-C also describes the limit on any upturn to the toe of the head. By Rule there is no limit to the length of the stick head along the x-axis, but practical considerations, as well as technicalities related to the joining of the head and the Handle (on the line C-C), did create limitations with wooden sticks.

The extent of the stick head along the X+ axis, towards the ‘heel’ of the Head is confined by the rule requirement that the stick head and the handle meet in a smooth continuous fashion at the line C-C and by a rule restriction on the shape of the handle, which is that the stick-handle must not project beyond the line B1-B1. It is possible to envisage a stick where the width of handle did not extend beyond the line A1-A1, thus allowing a significant extension of the stick head along the X+ axis, but the practicalities of such a design seem to be limited and have not been explored. The length of the Head (or toe) along the X- axis has varied enormously, especially since the Second World War and again after the introduction of the timber lamination process in the early 1980s.

The stick handle may be bent or ‘deviated’, in a smooth curve only, once only to either side. That is the handle may have one out-moving curve on the ‘heel’ side of the head and one out-moving curve on the toe side. It is therefore possible to have a hockey stick with a handle deviation to the front or toe side or a handle deviation to the back or ‘heel’ side or a stick-handle that is bent once to both the toe and ‘heel’ sides.

The sample diagram on the right shows three deviating areas (a), (b), and (c). Any of these areas could exist on a stick by itself but, in this illustration, area (a) could legally coexist with area (b) and area (c) could coexist with area (b); but areas (a) and (c) could not legally coexist on the same stick because they are both on the same edge and only one protrusion either beyond the line AA or beyond the line A1A1—or both—is permitted on the handle.

The maximum permitted width of the handle (51 mm) is illustrated in the diagram by the distance between the dotted lines A-A and A1-A1. A hockey stick handle will rarely be of the maximum permitted width: most are between 46 mm and 48 mm at the widest point.

Sample goalkeeper stick with long edge deviation to toe side

The maximum permitted ‘deviation’ is shown by the lines B-B and B1-B1 respectively. The line B-B is 20 mm further along the X- axis than the line A-A and the line B1-B1 is 20 mm further along the X+ axis than the line A1-A1. There is no limit to the length of a protrusion along the y-axis specified, so the deviation curve or curves may be of any length along the length of the stick-handle. Some goalkeeping sticks have an outward curve on the toe side (within the line B-B) that extends for almost half the total length of the stick.

The sample illustrated does not reach the line A1A1 on the ‘heel edge’ and the Y axis is not central to the shaft, which raises the question “How is the stick positioned for measurement of permitted deviation.” The answer is that the vertical axis Y runs through the top centre of the handle and the stick is assumed to be suspended from that top centre point and perpendicular to the X axis (the ground), the curve to the base of the head of the stick being in contact with the ground, it is therefore not necessary for the Y axis to pass through the centre of the shaft just above the head of the stick, although in most traditional sticks it will do so (or very nearly do so—as ‘rake’ to the handle may cause the Y axis to run a few millimeters to the heel side of the true centre of the shaft). To October 2015 no official measuring method or device for measuring ‘permitted deviation’ has been approved by the FIH.

Permitted bow [ edit ]

Increasing the degree of bow to the face side (flat side) makes it easier to get high speeds from the drag-flick (a “sling-shot” style stroke started from behind the body of the flicker) and allows easier execution of the stroke. At first, after extreme bows were introduced (2005), the Hockey Rules Board (HRB) placed a limit of 50 mm on the maximum depth of such a bow over the length of the stick, but experience quickly demonstrated this degree of bend to be excessive.

The Rules of Hockey 2006 limited this particular curve of the stick to 25 mm so as to limit the power with which the ball can be flicked and to try to ensure that hitting control was maintained (the curvature to the face of the stick considerably influences the angle at which the stick head strikes through the ball). The placement of the maximum bow along the length of handle has now been specified in the Rules of Hockey at 20 cm above the head (the line C-C).

Ascertaining compliance to bow limits

It is now illegal for any hockey stick to have a bow that exceeds 25 mm. The bow height is measured by placing the stick face-side to a flat surface and presenting the official measuring device, a 25 mm-high metal triangular or cylindrical measure, to the gap between the surface and the under-flat of the stick.

Since this article was first written in 2008, there have been attempts to get around the rule by the production of a stick which ‘in a natural resting position’ has a face side that is not parallel to the flat surface measured from but rests with the face at a sharp angle. The result of the sloping of the face side is to put one edge of it closer than 25 mm to the flat surface and permit a much deeper bow than would otherwise be possible. This flouts the intention of the rule, so it is possible that there may be a move to a measuring cylinder, under and across, the entire face of the stick.

Position of bow and effect on angle of head presentation

There was a development in design called the ‘low bow’. This placed the maximum bow of the stick much closer to the head than was previously the case, when it was positioned more centrally on the length of the stick. The effect of placing the maximum bow lower down the handle was to increase the angle at which the stick head was presented to the ball. The angle of presentation of a ’25 mm low bow’ was approximately the same as was achieved when the maximum permitted bow was 50 mm but the maximum was situated at about the mid-length of the stick.

Extreme bow has an effect on the ease with which stick-work and hitting of the ball (so that it stays on the ground) may be carried out. There has always been some bow to a stick handle, 10–20 mm was common (right in diagram) because to have a stick that was straight would make ‘gathering’ the ball, by pulling it towards the body from the left, more difficult and a bow in the other direction (a convex bow) would cause ‘dragging’ in stick-work and make hitting the ball cleanly difficult in the other.

A stick with a very small degree of bow (no more than 5 mm) was popular in the days when the clip hit in the outfield was a permitted stroke (a chip hit is a hit down on the top or back of the ball which causes it to rise sharply and produces under-spin, so that the ball does not run on when it lands). The increased use of the scoop when the lifted hit in the outfield was banned led to an increase in bow depth (and many players also found that a moderate bow aided stick-work as well). The maximum depth of this bow was generally at around the mid-length of the stick.

The ‘low bow’ has been popularized by the development of the drag-flick, particularly as a first shot on goal at a penalty corner. The Pakistan International player Sohail Abbas, who holds the record for the number of goals scored at international level, mostly scored with the set piece drag-flick, had such a stick made especially to his own requirements and many have copied his design—and tried to improve on it.

Hitting at various stick angles with a bowed stick.

Although there can be no doubt that the ‘slingshot’ effect of a bowed stick, when the ball is ‘dragged’ from the rear of the feet and released after powerful body and arm rotation to the front of the feet, has dramatically increased the velocity at which the ball may be propelled by this flicking method, there may be considerable difficulty in hitting the ball along the ground with a very bowed stick. This may be of advantage when shooting at the goal with a lifted hit from within the ‘circle’ (which is legal) but a disadvantage when hitting the ball outside of the scoring ‘circles’, because it is illegal to intentionally lift the ball with a hit except when within the scoring ‘circles’ i.e. the opponent’s ‘circle’.

The upright forehand hitting stroke, which is commonly used when the ball is close to the feet, will seldom be made with the handle in the same plane as the ball, unless the ball is to the immediate right of the player i.e. beside or alongside his feet. (Stick shown on far right of illustration)—which is generally the case when the ball is being hit directly to the front or from left to right—with a bowed stick even this vertical handle position will present an angled head to the ball. The further away to the front of the player the ball is the greater will be the head angle presented to the ball. To deal with the problem of head presentation some players use a low ’roundhouse’ style of hitting, rather than an upright style and may also employ sweep-hits or slap-hitting of the ball (the difference being the positioning of the hands, sweep hits are generally made with the hands together at the top of the stick and with the base of the stick head in contact with the ground, while slap-hits are usually made with the hands in the more spread dribbling grip and the stick head is not necessarily in contact with the ground, but it may be), either sweep or slap type strokes give greater control over the angle of the face of the stick as it makes contact with the ball and are often the preferred strokes when passing the ball over longer distances (over shorter distances—less than 20 m—a push stroke is often preferred).

Stick-face contact position: Ball contact position.

The detail illustration shows that when the handle is angled away from the ball both the position of contact with the ball on the ball and the part of the face of the stick making contact will be altered. The greater the bow the greater the degree of adjustment the player must make to his swing and to the hitting position of the ball to achieve a hit flat along the ground.

Stages of development [ edit ]

The development of the modern hockey stick has not taken place in one continuous flow with each development following on from a previous one. Many things changed in the same time frame but at different speeds, especially some of the later developments. There have been more changes in stick design in the last twenty-five years than there were in the previous one hundred and twenty-five and the pace of change has been an ever increasing one. There will no doubt be further development, probably in materials, possibly because of changes to the rules. In roughly chronological order this is what has happened so far.

1860s: Hockey taken to India. Stick head made shorter; move from ash to mulberry timber for the stick head. Further shortening of stick head; heel of head made tighter. Taken as far as possible by 1986, when a move back towards a midi length began.

1960s: Reinforcement with fiberglass.

1970s: Reinforcement with carbon and aramid as well as glass fibres.

1980s: Stick heads made from glued lamination of wood in addition to the one piece heads

1982: Introduction of upturned toe, first the hook closely followed by midi and “J” shaped designs.

1980s: Limit placed on upturn of toe of head at 100 mm.

1986: Kinked shaft stick. Set back stick head.

1980s: Stick lengths other than 36″, up to 39″, become widely available and custom lengths 42″+ can be purchased.

1990: Permitted deviation rule—limited bends to edges of stick handle defined.

1990: Specialist goalkeeper’s sticks introduced, the first being the ZigZag Save.

1980s: Metal handled stick with an inserted wooden head (plywood) introduced.

1994: Composite sticks fully accepted in rules after a two-year “experiment”.

1990s: Metal handles banned.

2004: Rule redefining of head and handle. Head the part from the base of the curve perpendicular to 100 mm—handle the remainder of the stick.

2000s: Refinement of head shapes, probably five shapes available as “standard”.

2000s: Number of wood core sticks in use declines as moulded “composites” become the norm.

2006: Bow of the face of the handle is increased to facilitate drag-flicking. Closely followed by a rule concerning maximum permitted bow; initially at 50 mm and subsequently at 25 mm.

2007: Low bow sticks introduced.

2011: Maximum stick bow position not permitted to be less than 8″ (20 cm) above the head of the stick.

2013: Maximum permitted weight reduced to 737 g (26 oz)

2015: Maximum length limit of 41″ (105 cm)introduced.

The forehand striking position [ edit ]

Ball position for propelling

For the purposes of this article the ball will be assumed to be 73 mm in diameter. Ball size does play a significant part in stickwork and ball control (as does the weight and hardness of the ball) but an investigation of these is outside the scope of this article. The width of stick handles does vary (as does the horizontal length of stick heads) but for clarity and convenience the shaft of the handle just above the head has been taken as 46 mm, which is fairly common, and the sticks scaled from that measurement.

The position of the ball when it is played, particularly hit with the stick head, does, however have a bearing on stick head design. Using just one of the whole range of angles the ball may be struck at from the forehand (right-hand) side (45°), the position of the ball will be looked at in relation to both the centre of the head of the stick and a line projected to run through the centre of the handle. An examination on the position of wear on the base of stick heads that have been used over a period on an abrasive playing surface lead to the conclusion that the ball is positioned close to the center of the head length of the modern stick. This is also the more usual position for receiving or stopping the ball in play while in the ‘dribbling crouch’. Obviously when the handle is vertical or horizontal there is considerable variation but in most common hitting and dribbling positions the line of the uppermost edge of the handle projects close to the centre of the ball.

One of the problems with a striking head that is significantly narrower than the diameter of the ball is that the ball is easily lifted unintentionally if struck with the face of the stick head inclined backward, ‘open’, rather than vertical or nearly so. Striking the ball with a ‘closed’ face is not always a solution, because it is then possible to ‘squeeze’ or ‘clip’ it, again causing the ball to rise, possibly even more steeply than with the so-called ‘undercut’ hit.

Another difficulty is striking the ball accurately at the point on the stick head that is intended (the usual range of error can be seen, in the diagram, in the difference of the lengths of the red lines that run from the centre of the two differently positioned stick heads).

It is also necessary to avoid unintentionally turning the handle during a hit at the ball so that the ball is “sliced” (to the right) or hooked (to the left), this is achieved by gripping the stick firmly, generally with one hand locked against the other at the top of the handle, at the moment of impact with the ball.

Ensuring vertical and flat (perpendicular to intended direction of ball travel) contact with the ball is in the hands of the player and the coach, but achieving a correct contact position between the stick head and the ball can be helped by the design of the stick.

“Heel” position, toe height

At a common playing angle three different styles of hook stick head present identical ball/handle relationships because the bend of the ‘heel’ is the same in each stick. An increase in the height of the toe over the ball is very noticeable and is most pronounced in the more ‘open’ shape. The modern hook does not suffer from the effects of a rotational imbalance in the head as much as the original did because stick heads are now generally tapered towards the toe, rather than of uniform thickness so toe height is not, from a weight and rotational balance point of view, as much of an issue as it once might have been. The stick head is also generally tapered from the midpoint of the striking area towards the bottom curve, so when the stick is in the reversed position the maximum thickness of the head is not at the highest point. This gives a more balanced rotation of the weight of the stick head over the ball.

Some of the early hooks were actually thinner in the centre and became thicker in the toe; it is likely that this was done to facilitate more powerful reversed-stick hitting of the ball but it gave the stick unusual handling characteristics when turning it over the ball and back in “stickwork”: an “overturning” or “throw” of the stick head had to be taken into account. The composite stick is generally lighter than the previous wood versions and it is unusual these days to find a young player using the 25–26 oz sticks that were quite commonly used on grass in the 1970s, especially by those likely to be regularly taking hits at a stationary ball.

Field hockey stick brands [ edit ]

The majority of modern hockey sticks are manufactured in Asia (Pakistan, India, and China predominantly). Manufacturers will often produce sticks for a number ddxxxxsasssssss of different brands.

Smoothcarbon

See also[edit]

Sorry, we just need to make sure you’re not a robot. For best results please make sure your browser accepts cookies.

Which Cars Have the Fastest Quarter Mile Acceleration Time?

Rimac Nevera | Rimac

In the past, the cars with the fastest quarter-mile acceleration times were dominated by gas-powered cars with massive engines that could put out a lot of power. However, the introduction of electric cars has “completely changed the game,” as HotCars details. With the instantaneous torque output of electric drives, EVs have inherent acceleration advantages over gasoline-powered cars.

Here are the fastest cars with the fastest 1/4 mile times:

Rimac Nevera: 1/4 mile time: 8.6 seconds Bugatti Chiron Super Sport: 1/4 mile time: 9.1 seconds Tesla Model S Plaid: 1/4 mile time: 9.2 seconds Ultima Evolution: 1/4 mile Time: 9.3 seconds Ferrari LaFerrari: 1/4 mile time: 9.7 seconds Koenigsegg One:1: 1/4 mile time: 9.8 seconds Porsche 918 Spyder: 1/4 mile time: 9.8 seconds McLaren P1: 1/4 mile time: 9.8 seconds Porsche 911 Turbo S: 1/4 mile time: 9.9 seconds Bugatti Veyron 16.4 Super Sport: 1/4 mile time: 9.9 seconds

Rimac Nevara has the fastest 1/4 mile acceleration time

The all-electric Rimac Nevara takes the top spot as the fastest car with the fastest 1/4 mile acceleration time, completing the sprint in just 8.6 seconds. With their environmentally friendly, zero-emission powertrains, electric vehicles are the future of the automotive industry. In addition, electric cars have impressive capabilities that the Rimac Nevara really shows off.

The Rimac Nevara features four electric motors that produce an incredible 1,914 hp and 1,696 lb-ft of torque. Along with its quarter mile time of 8.6 seconds, the Nevara can accelerate from 0 to 60 mph in under two seconds.

Bugatti Chiron Super Sport has the fastest quarter mile acceleration time for a gas powered car

With a time of just 9.1 seconds, the Bugatti Chiron Super Sport takes the top spot for quarter-mile acceleration for a gas-powered car. The Chiron Super Sport is the successor to the legendary Veyron and continues its legacy of outstanding performance. It’s equipped with an 8.0-liter, quad-turbocharged W16 engine that puts out a mighty 1,578 hp and 1,180 lb-ft of torque. The Chiron Super Sport also has an impressive 0-60 mph acceleration time of just 2.2 seconds.

Tesla Model S Plaid has a very fast acceleration time of 1/4 mile

Tesla Model S Plaid | Tesla

The all-electric Tesla Model S Plaid ranks third on the list of fast cars with the fastest 1/4-mile acceleration time, completing the sprint in just 9.2 seconds. It is powered by three electric motors that have an output of 1,020 hp. The Model S Plaid accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in just 1.99 seconds.

Do you have the need for speed? If so, then enjoy the rapid quarter-mile acceleration of fast cars like the Rimac Nevara, Bugatti Chiron Super Sport, and Tesla Model S Plaid.

RELATED: 5 most affordable sports cars: Fun to drive at a budget-friendly price

The current Carwow drag race king is the Rimac Nevera – the electric hypercar from Croatia with 4 electric motors and incredible 1,914 hp. But what about the hundreds of other cars, bikes, trucks and off-roaders we’ve raced over the years? Well, our drag race leaderboard shows you exactly how they fare.

Click on each car’s link to watch the drag race for yourself. Some cars have entered more than one drag race, so have multiple 1/4 mile times. Drag race times recorded in wet conditions are marked with a (W).

After a few teasers here and here, we can finally get a look at the full experience of this quad-motor 1.4MW beast at the track.

DragTimes walks us through the car overview, then runs a burnout demonstration and several drag races that resulted in a world record time of 8.582 seconds at 167.51 mph (269.5 km/h).

Results (Michelin Pilot 4S tires):

#1 8.74 seconds @ 165.52 mph (without burnout

#2 8.612 seconds at 166.99 mph (with burn out)

Record run: 8.582 seconds at 167.51 mph (269.5 km/h)

DragTimes seems smitten with the Rimac Nevera, and that’s saying a lot from a person who tests many of the fastest cars, including the Tesla Model S Plaid.

Speaking of which, the Tesla Model S Plaid will be drag racing against the Rimac Nevera in the next episode!

Recall that the Rimac Nevera can be seen at Monterey Car Week in Pebble Beach (August 12-15).

Best Numbers:

0-60mph (96.5km/h) – 1.90 seconds

0-100 km/h (62 mph) – 2.00 seconds

0-100mph (161km/h) – 3.61 seconds

0-130mph (209km/h) – 5.36 seconds

0-150mph (240km/h) – 6.88 seconds

60-130mph – 3.42 seconds

100-150mph (240km/h) – 3.27 seconds

100-200 km/h – 2.95 seconds

1/8 mile – 5.64 seconds at 132.33 mph

1/4 mile – 8.582 seconds at 167.51 mph (269.5 km/h)

Dragy Measures #1:

0-60mph (96.5km/h) – 2.20 seconds

0-130mph (209km/h) – 5.61 seconds

60-130mph – 3.41 seconds

100-150mph (240km/h) – 3.28 seconds

1/8 mile – 5.73 seconds at 132.96 mph (213.99 km/h)

1/4 mile – 8.66 seconds at 167.98 mph (270.32 km/h)

0-100 km/h (62 mph) – 2.28 seconds

0-200 km/h – 5.23 seconds

100-200 km/h – 2.95 seconds

200-250 km/h – 2.36 seconds

Dragy Measures #2:

0-60mph (96.5km/h) – 2.13 seconds

0-130mph (209km/h) – 5.58 seconds

60-130mph – 3.45 seconds

100-150mph (240km/h) – 3.28 seconds

1/8 mile – 5.71 seconds at 132.72 mph (213.59 km/h)

1/4 mile – 8.65 seconds at 167.54 mph (269.63 km/h)

0-100 km/h (62 mph) – 2.21 seconds

0-200 km/h – 5.19 seconds

100-200 km/h – 2.98 seconds

200-250 km/h – 2.38 seconds

* all results with 1 ft rollout

Rimac Nevera Specifications:

up to 550 km (342 miles) WLTP range (provisional)

range (provisional) 120 kWh battery; liquid cooled

800 V system voltage (maximum 730 V)

Lithium Manganese Nickel Chemistry

Cell Format: Cylindrical 2170

Number of cells: 6,960

Battery; Liquid-cooled 800V system voltage (maximum 730V) Lithium-manganese-nickel chemistry Cell format: cylindrical 2170 Number of cells: 6,960 acceleration

0-60 mph (96.5 km/h) in 1.85 seconds (*high friction surface, coasting with one foot)

0-100 km/h (62 mph) in 1.97 seconds (*high friction surface, one foot roll)

0-300 km/h (186 mph) in 9.3 seconds (high friction surface, one foot roll)

1/4 mile (402 m) time in 8.6 seconds

0-60 mph (96.5 km/h) in 1.85 seconds (*high friction surface, one foot roll) 0-100 km/h (62 mph) in 1.97 seconds (*high friction surface, One foot roll) 0-300 km/h (186 mph) in 9.3 seconds (high friction surface, one foot roll) 1/4 mile (402 m) time in 8.6 seconds Top speed of 412 km /h (258mph)

all wheel drive

System output of 1,408 kW (or 1.4 MW; 1,914 hp) and 2,360 Nm

four independent, surface mount, permanent magnet, carbon sleeve electric motors

four independent inverters and gearboxes

Rimac’s intelligent all-wheel drive torque vectoring system (R-AWTV)

Front engines: 250 kW (340 hp) and 280 Nm each, combined with two single-speed gearboxes (two independent gearboxes – one at each outer end of the axle)

Rear engines: 450 kW (612 hp) and 900 Nm each, combined with double single-speed gearbox (two gearboxes in one housing between the engines)

four independent surface mount permanent magnet electric motors with carbon sleeve four independent inverters and gearboxes Rimac’s intelligent all-wheel drive torque vectoring system (R-AWTV) front motors: 250 kW (340 hp) and 280 Nm each, combined with two single speed gearboxes (two independent Transmission – one at each outer end of the axle) Rear engines: 450 kW (612 hp) and 900 Nm each, combined with double single-speed transmission (two transmissions in one housing between the engines) AC charging (on-board): 22 kW three-phase current

DC fast charging: up to 500 kW (0-80% SOC in 22 minutes, with ultra-fast charger)

length 4750mm; width 1986 mm; Height 1208mm; Wheelbase 2745mm

weight of 2,150 kg

Tyres: Michelin Pilot Sport 4S (front 275/35 R20; rear 315/35 R20)

Gallery: Rimac Nevera

Red Victor 2 is a 1972 Vauxhall Victor owned by British mechanic Andy Frost. Frost bought the car in 1981 and began customizing it as a hobby. It was once considered the fastest street-legal car in the world[1][2][3] and now boasts over 2,300 horsepower. However, since it is not a production car, it is not officially considered a record holder.

The car was previously called the Red Victor One.[4]

Statistics[edit]

engine [edit]

The car was bought with an original 104hp 2000cc 4-cylinder engine. After a number of engine iterations, the car is now powered by a 572ci twin turbo Chevrolet V8.

Specifications as follows:

Dart big M block

Lunati Pro Series 4340 forged crank

Oliver bars made from billet steel

Diamond turbo pistons

Speed ​​per “Hellfire” rings

Aviaid 4 stage dry sump pump

Modified Aviaid sump

Altiss Engineering custom oil pump drive, oil tank and breather can

Cam belt drive Jesel

Don Bailey designed Comp Cams custom turbo roller cams

Comp Cams H/D reel lifter

Manton 210 deg 7/16″ ex pushrods, Comp cams 7/16″ inlet

Cometic multi-layer steel head gaskets

ARP head studs

Dart Pro1 355 CNC heads with Ferrea stainless steel intake valves and superalloy exhaust valves modified by RFD developments

Edelbrock 454R intake manifold modified by Altiss for 2 x 1500cc Ford Motorsport injectors per cylinder

Manley valve springs

T+D 1.75 wave rockers

Ali rocker covers modified by Altiss

Altiss c/w2 x Turbosmart Pro wastegates custom 321 stainless steel trays

Burns 321 Stainless Merge Collectors and Custom 321 Stainless 4.5″ exhaust system

Turbonetics “Godzilla” BOV

Billet 2200cfm throttle body

Custom throttle body CNC machined by a Taylor machine and finished by Altiss

2 x ARE cooling 12″ x 7″ x 13″” air to water cores, with 8 gallon water tank. Tanks made by Altiss

turbos [edit]

2 x Holset 88mm Custom Hybrid Turbos specified by Holset with Inconel exhaust wheels

Other [edit]

The vehicle runs on Shell V-Power pump fuel with Power Pour additive.

It uses a Ford 9 inch rear mated to a custom 2 speed gearbox built by Andy Frost and Penn Autos.

Front brakes are 290mm ventilated discs with custom four-pot calipers. 260mm vented rear discs with custom pads. All built by Hi-Spec.

Numbers and records[ edit ]

Speed ​​Records:

0-60mph = 0.9 seconds

0-150mph = 5.0 seconds

0-189mph = 7.6 seconds

Standing 1/4 = 7.41 & 197 mph at this point.

Top speed = 223 mph, and no body came off. This was carried out at Bruntingthorpe in September 2008. That speed was reached in a slow 19 seconds due to excessive wheel spin and gas deceleration.

Street Eliminator speed record holder at 190.4 mph.

World Pump Gas ET and land speed record holder on MT 315 radials 7.67 at 190.4 mph.

King of Europe Winner 2009. King of Europe speed and ET record holder 7.81 at 188 mph.

Winner of the UK Castrol Challenge in 2006 and 2007.

The future[edit]

Andy Frost built the successor to RedVictor2, an evolution of the original car, RedVictor3 is built to compete in the Pro Modified in the FIA ​​European Championship while maintaining the street legal status that forms the core ethos of the racing team. The build of the updated car is covered here in the RedVictor3 build diary

Red winner 3 [ edit ]

In mid-2011, performance specifications for VXR’s still-in-production RedVictor3 were released. It uses an 8.8-liter twin-turbo engine with 3000 hp at the rear. Red Victor 3 will remain road legal and use pump gas on the road.[5] It will be faster than Larry Larson’s ’66 Nova, which recently trumped the Red Victor 1 for fastest street-legal vehicle. It was the fastest and fastest street legal car in the world at the 1/4 mile as of June 2012 with an elapsed time of 6.59 at 220 mph.

Jeff Lutz is now the world’s fastest street legal with a time of 5.85 @ 250 mph. [citation required] [6]

Notes and references[edit]