당신은 주제를 찾고 있습니까 “journal of unification studies – What is a study journal?“? 다음 카테고리의 웹사이트 https://chewathai27.com/you 에서 귀하의 모든 질문에 답변해 드립니다: https://chewathai27.com/you/blog. 바로 아래에서 답을 찾을 수 있습니다. 작성자 OpenLearn from The Open University 이(가) 작성한 기사에는 조회수 5,500회 및 좋아요 120개 개의 좋아요가 있습니다.
Table of Contents
journal of unification studies 주제에 대한 동영상 보기
여기에서 이 주제에 대한 비디오를 시청하십시오. 주의 깊게 살펴보고 읽고 있는 내용에 대한 피드백을 제공하세요!
d여기에서 What is a study journal? – journal of unification studies 주제에 대한 세부정보를 참조하세요
DESCRIPTION
For more like this subscribe to the Open University channel
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXsH4hSV_kEdAOsupMMm4Qw
Free learning from The Open University
(Part 1 of 3 )
Playlist link – https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhQpDGfX5e7CkGv1oTwUzzH0crSmYmPVm
Study free at the Open University
Study (Insert subject and or course)
The Open University is the world’s leading provider of flexible, high quality online degrees and distance learning, serving students across the globe with highly respected degree qualifications, and the triple accredited MBA. The OU teaches through its own unique method of distance learning, called ‘supported open learning’ and you do not need any formal qualifications to study with us, just commitment and a desire to find out what you are capable of.
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ouopenlearn/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/OUFreeLearning
journal of unification studies 주제에 대한 자세한 내용은 여기를 참조하세요.
JOURNAL OF UNIFICATION STUDIES / From Editor
To clarify foundational issues in Unification theology, the Journal of Unification Studies welcomes commentary and critical studies of texts and doctrines, as …
Source: www.unification-thought.org
Date Published: 2/1/2021
View: 1173
International Journal – Publications
International Journal ; 53, International Journal of Korean Unification Studies 2022 Vol.31 No.1, 2022-06-30 ; 52, International Journal of Korean Unification …
Source: www.kinu.or.kr
Date Published: 6/16/2022
View: 710
Journal of unification studies. – National University of Ireland
Unification Theological Seminary. ; ; Barrytown, N.Y. : Unification Theological Seminary; Vol. 1 (1997)- ;. ; c1997- ;. Journal of unification studies.
Source: maynoothuniversity.userservices.exlibrisgroup.com
Date Published: 4/22/2022
View: 1907
Journal of unification studies | Standard Journal Abbreviation (ISO4 …
The ISO4 abbreviation of Journal of unification studies is J. unification stud. . It is the standardised abbreviation to be used for abstracting, …
Source: academic-accelerator.com
Date Published: 10/21/2021
View: 2913
Journal of Peace and Unification Studies – ResearchGate
Journal of Peace and Unification Studies | Read 93 articles with impact on ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.
Source: www.researchgate.net
Date Published: 2/5/2021
View: 2529
Korea Institute for National Unification – 통일연구원
LatestIssue journal. Journal Title: Unification Policy Studies … KINU aims to support the establishment of the government’s unification policies by …
Source: kinu.jams.or.kr
Date Published: 6/17/2021
View: 9531
주제와 관련된 이미지 journal of unification studies
주제와 관련된 더 많은 사진을 참조하십시오 What is a study journal?. 댓글에서 더 많은 관련 이미지를 보거나 필요한 경우 더 많은 관련 기사를 볼 수 있습니다.
주제에 대한 기사 평가 journal of unification studies
- Author: OpenLearn from The Open University
- Views: 조회수 5,500회
- Likes: 좋아요 120개
- Date Published: 2018. 4. 13.
- Video Url link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ulBjlbXbeo
JOURNAL OF UNIFICATION STUDIES
Reflections on the Significance of UT
From Editor Understanding God: The Conceptual and the Experiential in Unification Thought
KEISUKE NODA Prolegomena to a Philosophical Inquiry into the Spirit World
CLAUDE PERROTTET Knowledge of God? A Critique and Proposal for Epistemology in Unification Thought
ANDREW WILSON An Exploration of Questions in the Ontology of Unification Thought
DAVID BURTON A Reflection on Unification Thought, Evil and Theodicy
THOMAS J. WARD Notes Toward a Universal History: Insights from the Unification Principle
MICHAEL L. MICKLER JOURNAL OF UNIFICATION STUDIES
VOL. IV
2001-2002
From Editor
This issue of the Journal of Unification Studies presents papers from the Research Institute for the Unification of World Thought’s second Seminar on Unification Thought, which was held on the campus of the University of Bridgeport on August 18, 2001. Nearly a dozen Unificationist scholars, drawn mainly from the University of Bridgeport and the Unification Theological Seminary, shared the results of their critical research. Each paper focused on a specific chapter or topic dealt with by existing Unification Thought texts and explored new avenues for research.
Seven papers have been selected for publication out of that seminar. Avoiding the extremes of disparagement on the one hand and slavish repetition on the other, they strive for a respectful yet critical engagement with the texts of Unification Thought, the Divine Principle and Rev. Moon’s sermons. Their sole purpose is to advance the development of Unification philosophy as a system of thought that is relevant to contemporary issues and engaged with classical and modern currents of philosophy.
One theme that spans several of these essays is concern about bridging the rational and experiential aspects of knowledge, a topic explicitly developed by Keisuke Noda in the paper which leads off this issue. Particularly when it comes to knowledge of God and spiritual realities, the question of how to connect the rational construct of philosophy with human experience looms large. How, if knowledge of God is finally experiential, can unspiritual people have any confidence in the validity of a religious philosophy? Can a religious philosophy like Unification Thought bolster and sharpen people’s experience of God? Noda argues that these two ways of knowing should be viewed as complementary, rather than in opposition. He thus affirms the classical idea that personal spiritual growth is advantageous for proper reasoning.
That an inadequate philosophy can interfere with comprehension of spiritual experience is the subject of Claude Perrottet’s paper, “Prolegomena to a Philosophical Inquiry into the Spirit World.” His thesis is that there is a deeply embedded error in Western philosophy, namely the denial of true corporeality to spirit. This has created an “abyss” between theoretical notions of spirit among philosophers and theologians on the one hand, and the centuries-long tradition of spiritual experience among mystics and people gifted with psychic abilities on the other. The value of Perrottet’s essay is that it surveys the environment and lays the groundwork for systematic elucidation of a theory of the spirit world; hence its title “Prolegomena.” It is a contribution to ongoing research towards developing a philosophy of the spirit world by Unificationist thinkers the world over.
The question of religious knowledge is also the theme in Andrew Wilson’s paper, which critiques the treatment of Epistemology in existing Unification Thought texts as excessively focused on the cognition of tangible things in the external world and as lacking sufficient attention to cognition of invisible, spiritual realities. Drawing on the Divine Principle and other chapters in Unification Thought, Wilson suggests a new departure for Unification Epistemology that faces squarely what he regards as the fundamental question, “How can we know the reality of God?” or more exactly, “How can we have valid knowledge of invisible things?” He posits that the rational ground for such knowledge lies in setting human beings within a subject-object relationship, in which the aim is not to cognize an “object of cognition” but rather to fathom the being of a higher subject, who addresses us.
Critiquing the texts of Unification Thought from the standpoint of logic alone, David Burton’s essay breaks new ground. He identifies four areas where Unification ontology “is not as comprehensive or complete as it appears at first sight.” These include: 1) a possible circular argument entangling Divine Principle and Unification Thought in their discussion of God’s attributes; 2) questions about the how the “life field” or “cosmic consciousness” fits into the structure of the cosmos; 3) possible discrepancies between the Original Image and created beings regarding the “principal-subordinate” pair of dual characteristics and the “connected body”; and 4) questions about the process of creation, which seems proceed in two distinct ways. These questions point to the unfinished nature of Unification Thought and provide starting-points for the next generation of Unificationist thinkers.
In describing the nature of God, Unification Thought’s teaching of the dual characteristics promotes a balanced view of God with respect to gender. According to this teaching, God created all things in male-female pairs to reflect God’s own nature as the harmonious union of original masculinity and original femininity. Nevertheless, most Unificationists refer to God as “Father,” using masculine language. This practice is not merely a tension between theology and piety, but has roots in another strand of Rev. Moon’s thought-as elucidated in Stephen Nomura’s essay, “God as Masculine Subject Partner.” Like Paul’s letter to the Ephesians, Nomura sees an asymmetrical relationship between man and woman, which he claims is grounded in their dissimilar relationships with God. The editorial board struggled over whether to publish this essay, chiefly because its advocacy of God’s masculinity was not balanced by way of consideration of God’s dual characteristics and their significance for the male-female relationship, and its neglect of any critical consideration of the abuse that might arise from such beliefs. Nevertheless, we felt the paper highlights an important strand of Rev. Moon’s current message, which should initiate a wider theological discussion, and we look forward to publishing differing points of view.
Thomas Ward’s essay is a rather personal reflection about how an intellectual schooled in the European philosophical tradition found in Unification Thought a superior answer to the problem of theodicy. Having worked on the forefront of ideological education efforts against Marxism-Leninism for many years, Ward now turns his attention to major issues in dispute between the Unificationism and the wider universe of secular thought. His contribution is to point out several areas of “conventional wisdom” that stand in the way of the acceptance of Unification teaching on the Human Fall: among them, that alienation can be overcome by the individual’s search to “find himself,” the view that the Fall was not an historical event, disbelief in the devil, denial of the destructive power of unbridled sexuality, and a pervading view of God as somehow tainted with the same evil that affects His creations. The next step would be extensive ideological research to develop adequate refutations of each of these secular doctrines.
The same ambition to develop a Unificationist theory persuasive to a wider secular audience lies behind Michael Mickler’s paper, “Towards a Universal History.” Following Dr. Lee’s admission that the providential view of history “can hardly have any persuasive power today,” he identifies as a weakness in Unification Thought’s theory of history that it describes governing laws abstracted only from the sacred histories of Judaism and Christianity. The theory needs to be complemented, Mickler argues, by the additional work of application and extended to other sacred and secular histories. He sketches eight stages in a “universal course of restoration” that can be applicable to all histories, and to the personal life-journey as well.
The Research Institute for the Unification of World Thought was founded by Rev. Moon in December 2000 in order to encourage academic research on fundamental philosophical issues in a way that is both non-sectarian and respectful of the spiritual and intellectual traditions of the world. It is located in Bridgeport, CT. The editor is grateful to the Institute for permission to publish these papers.
The JUS has regularly published articles describing and analyzing the often-difficult social environment facing religious groups, and the Unification Church in particular. While the battle for religious freedom has been won in the United States, the situation is uneven in different parts of the world. Persecution of small religious groups has lately become prevalent in Europe. Here we present a perceptive commentary by the distinguished German sociologist Dr. Erwin Scheuch. It is based on an address that he presented in Berlin in September 2000.
>> Go to top
The Journal Of Unification Studies
Editor: Andrew Wilson
Editorial Board: Tyler Hendricks, Michael L. Mickler, Andrew Wilson
Production Editor: Jonathan Gullery
The Journal of Unification Studies, a journal of the Unification Theological Seminary, is a forum for committed engagement with Unification theology and practice, addressing concerns of the theological community and the professional ministry. To clarify foundational issues in Unification theology, the Journal of Unification Studies welcomes commentary and critical studies of texts and doctrines, as well as historical studies of the Unification Church and the life of its founder. To promote dialogue and understanding, it invites papers from diverse viewpoints which engage Unificationist themes, as well as papers which build bridges to other communities of faith. To foster living spirituality, it welcomes essays discussing the relationship between theology and practice. To address contemporary social, cultural, political, scientific and economic issues from a Unificationist perspective, the journal solicits social commentaries and reviews of current books, films, and media.
The Journal of Unification Studies is published annually or semi-annually by the Unification Theological Seminary, 30 Seminary Drive, Barrytown, New York, 12571. Subscription rates are $10 per issue in the United States, $14 overseas, and $15 for institutions; discounts are available for multiple issues. Make checks payable to the Unification Theological Seminary. To order call 845-752-3012. Submissions and inquiries may be sent to the editor by mail at the above address, by fax to 845-752-3014, or by e-mail at [email protected].
ISSN: 1097-1769
© 2002 Unification Theological Seminary
>> Go to top
Korea Institute for National Unification
Objectives
KINU aims to support the establishment of the government’s unification policies by providing in-depth and systematic research and analysis on unification issues. In doing so, KINU contributes to enhancing the national capacity for making unification come true and proactively responding to changing environment in pursuit of unification.
Founding Background
Since the late 1980s, radical changes in the international circumstances have brought about shifts of the environment surrounding unification. This has led the ROK government to promote exchange with the socialist bloc and pursue unification diplomacy between the two Koreas. Against this backdrop, there arose the need for the establishment of programs designed to promote a desirable public view of unification. Another increased demand was the necessity to expand the unification discourse and to establish a systematic and specialized research institute. In respond to such demands, the Research Institute for National Unification (RINU) was founded on April 9, 1991 in accordance with the Research Institute for National Unification Act (Act No.4241). In 1999, it was renamed as the Korea Institute for National Unification (KINU).
키워드에 대한 정보 journal of unification studies
다음은 Bing에서 journal of unification studies 주제에 대한 검색 결과입니다. 필요한 경우 더 읽을 수 있습니다.
이 기사는 인터넷의 다양한 출처에서 편집되었습니다. 이 기사가 유용했기를 바랍니다. 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오. 매우 감사합니다!
사람들이 주제에 대해 자주 검색하는 키워드 What is a study journal?
- OU_
- The Open University
What #is #a #study #journal?
YouTube에서 journal of unification studies 주제의 다른 동영상 보기
주제에 대한 기사를 시청해 주셔서 감사합니다 What is a study journal? | journal of unification studies, 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오, 매우 감사합니다.
