당신은 주제를 찾고 있습니까 “leica cm vs contax t3 – 5 Flashship P\u0026S film cameras reviewed | Contax T3 vs. Leica CM vs. Nikon 35ti \u002628ti vs. Minolta TC-1“? 다음 카테고리의 웹사이트 Chewathai27.com/you 에서 귀하의 모든 질문에 답변해 드립니다: Chewathai27.com/you/blog. 바로 아래에서 답을 찾을 수 있습니다. 작성자 Jimmy Cheng 이(가) 작성한 기사에는 조회수 1,226회 및 좋아요 35개 개의 좋아요가 있습니다.
Table of Contents
leica cm vs contax t3 주제에 대한 동영상 보기
여기에서 이 주제에 대한 비디오를 시청하십시오. 주의 깊게 살펴보고 읽고 있는 내용에 대한 피드백을 제공하세요!
d여기에서 5 Flashship P\u0026S film cameras reviewed | Contax T3 vs. Leica CM vs. Nikon 35ti \u002628ti vs. Minolta TC-1 – leica cm vs contax t3 주제에 대한 세부정보를 참조하세요
In this video, I will go over 5 flagship p\u0026s cameras. They are:
1. Leica CM
2. Contax T3
3. Minolta TC-1
4. Nikon 35Ti
5. Nikon 28Ti
I will go over the size, craftsmanship, ease of use, optical quality of each camera and you can decide which one works for you.
My Vlog gear:
Sony ZV1 kit (for travel) : https://amzn.to/3xCbJJV
Sony A7S3: https://amzn.to/3hCIiAF
Sony FE 20mm F1.8 G: https://amzn.to/3jBU6Wm
Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Di III RXD: https://amzn.to/3dH2C2w
timeline:
0:00 intro
0:05 overview
0:45 why p\u0026s cameras
2:00 size comparison
3:23 craftsmanship
5:01 lens comparison
7:18 ease of use comparison
10:48 viewfinder comparison
11:45 value for money comparison
leica cm vs contax t3 주제에 대한 자세한 내용은 여기를 참조하세요.
Leica CM or Contax T3 | Photo.net Photography Forums
It’s cheaper, has a far better finder, and fits the purpose size-wise. If you don’t mind carrying the CM the way it forces you to, maybe you’ll …
Source: www.photo.net
Date Published: 7/15/2021
View: 7610
Leica CM vs Contax T3 – Rangefinderforum.com
The CM has a handy dedicated manual focus dial, larger buttons, an illuminated rear display, a Leica TTL hot shoe. The T3’s top display is not …
Source: www.rangefinderforum.com
Date Published: 1/4/2022
View: 8525
Contax T3 vs Leica CM | CI Photocommunity – Camera-info.com
The CM is Leica’s answer to the Contax T3. The changes made obviously show that Leica used the T3 as the benchmark… faster shutter speeds, …
Source: camera-info.com
Date Published: 8/2/2021
View: 3585
Leica Cm vs Contax T3 va Contax G 45mm – Clubsnap
Anybody who has used the Leica CM or Minilux AND either of the Contax? I am especially interested to know if the CM can produce those 3D …
Source: www.clubsnap.com
Date Published: 5/7/2021
View: 6008
Are You a Leica OR Zeiss Person? Leica M6 vs Contax T3
… and you must be wondering (rightfully) what kind of crack have I smoked to put the Leica M6 and Contax T3 against each others!
Source: onfilmonly.com
Date Published: 1/13/2022
View: 125
Contax T3 or Leica CM (nt): Open Talk Forum: Digital Photography …
Contax T3 or Leica CM (nt). In reply to Tulsaman • Oct 22, 2004. Tulsaman wrote: I know many of us on these forums have more than one camera, or
Source: www.dpreview.com
Date Published: 6/21/2021
View: 8382
Contax T3 vs Contax G2+G35 vs Leica Minilux vs Minolta TC …
I have to say I disagree with the first poster. I think the T3 is probably the best here. The CM is too big and the TC-1 whilst wonderful is too we at 28mm.
Source: pbase.com
Date Published: 10/20/2022
View: 4473
주제와 관련된 이미지 leica cm vs contax t3
주제와 관련된 더 많은 사진을 참조하십시오 5 Flashship P\u0026S film cameras reviewed | Contax T3 vs. Leica CM vs. Nikon 35ti \u002628ti vs. Minolta TC-1. 댓글에서 더 많은 관련 이미지를 보거나 필요한 경우 더 많은 관련 기사를 볼 수 있습니다.
주제에 대한 기사 평가 leica cm vs contax t3
- Author: Jimmy Cheng
- Views: 조회수 1,226회
- Likes: 좋아요 35개
- Date Published: 2022. 4. 1.
- Video Url link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPP9urygspw
Contax T3 vs Leica CM
Review of the CM on photo.netby roger michel:”i got a chance to see a CM very briefly (five minutes at a trade show) several weeks ago and posted favorable initial impressions. i thought it might be a worthy competitor for the excellent t3, especially with its faster lens and apparent better manual controls. after spending a much longer time actually shooting pics with a CM yesterday, i have now come to believe that it has very serious design defects, and cannot touch the t3 as a leica-style compact street shooter.let me first say that i did not have a manual, but rather received detailed instructions from a company rep. i am assuming he gave me correct information. if i have misstated anything, please correct me ASAP. let me also say that IMO the standard set by the t3 is very high indeed. the lens wide open shows greater measured center sharpness than the 35 cron at 2.8. the custom controls allow you to control virtually every important parameter. the one button persistent AF/AE lock is genius. the build quality is very high, there is a great hard half-case, and the camera is virtually silent. a tough act to follow!!as for the CM, the obvious shortcomings are these: (1) no filters OR shades. i honestly can’t see how this feature could have been omitted. filters are essential to good b&w photography. the ricoh and contax offerings have this facility — why not leica?? (2) the camera is larger than the t3 or gr1 by a fair margin which makes it less stealthy and pocketable. (3) no hard half case oor any other facility for normal 2 lug strap hanging. again, ricoh and contax offer this useful feature. (4) THE BIG ONE!! neither the focus nor the exposure can be preset for quick firing!!!! in manual focus and manual aperture setting, you must still depress the shutter halfway and wait for the camera to focus to the preset distance and calculate exposure before it will fire!! this creates a HUGE lag — as long a lag as if you used AF/AE!!! with the contax and ricoh, when you set manual focus and lock exposure the camera immediately locks the lens at the prefocused distance and dials in the exposure. then, when you press the button, the camera fires IMMEDIATELY — no lag. the leica CM system is a joke. why bother to have the manual settings if they create as much lag as the auto settings. (5) the AF was markedly slower than either the ricoh or t3 that i brought for comparison. (6) the plastic surround on the rear LCD is uncomfortable againt the face. (7) very limited range of custom settings as compared to the t3.this post is already too long, so i won’t go into any more detail. but, IMO, if the rep is right and there is no way to get the camera to actually prefocus and stay prefocused in the manual mode, creating a huge focus lag before every shot, i just don’t see how the CM can be called a “decisive moment “camera (as leica does). this is an unbelievable omission. why they didn’t just copy the wonderful “one-touch” AF/AE lock of the t3 is a baffling mystery.hopefully somebody will tell me that the rep got it wrong and there is a custom setting somewhere to overcome this otherwise fatal defect. contax was rumored to have obtained input from more than 100 photogs shooting beta s&les befored it finalized the features on the t3. did leica do anything beyond talking to the design boys (it is a beautiful camera)??”
Leica Cm vs Contax T3 va Contax G 45mm
Had both before, but sold them. Just that there were things about each camera that I could not adapt to. Now especially when i use it to take pics of my family, the G2 kinda puts my girl off her natural self when she hears the “woosh woosh” sound of the lens focusing.
..If u cant be satisfied with G2/T3,then you can forget about the miniature VF of minilux/G1,and I dont think CM be much better from the review pic of its VF,and all said CM pic quality=minilux though.
Put in this way,when I used/test minilux/G1,I sold them at once due to their un-usable dim/small VF PERSONALLY(read,my personal feel only and I wera specs)
When I used T3 and G2,aha,VF much better and good feel at hand,fun to shoot.
But due to my feel of R3a/eos 1V body/VF etc,I bite the bullet and sell them also,though I miss the smaller set up,cuteness of T3 and super nice of G lens.
Have you seen any 3D like pics from the Minilux? G45 is still my favourite, and my wife likes it too. If The CM can be anything close to the G45, she won’t grumble so much with the new purchase. :bsmilie:
Are You a Leica OR Zeiss Person? Leica M6 vs Contax T3 – On Film Only
Are You a Leica OR Zeiss Person? Leica M6 vs Contax T3
This might sound like a strange comparison and you must be wondering (rightfully) what kind of crack have I smoked to put the Leica M6 and Contax T3 against each others!
These two cameras have nothing in common. One is a mechanical rangefinder with interchangeable lenses whereas the other is a Point & Shoot with a fixed 35mm lens, but stay with me a little more and this will make sense, I promise.
Are You a Leica or Zeiss person?
Between two crack pipes I ask myself existential questions such as “Am I a Leica or Zeiss person?”. It’s like Dog or Cat people, you can’t be both and need to pick your side!
I sit at the Cat People table but when it comes to lenses, I’m still in between 2 camps. For the sake of consistency in my work, I thought that it would be good to finally choose a team and stick to it once for all.
So today we’re not here to compare the cameras but rather their lenses. Most of the time, on my M6 TTL is glued the mighty 35mm Leica M Summicron V4 Pre-ASPH (A.K.A The King of Bokeh). This version is probably the most notorious and soughed among all the 35 Summicron’s. Other 35 Cron’s are excellent but this V4 Pre-ASPH has developed a sort of cult following and became a trophy lens to own at some point for any respectable Leica connoisseur.
The “King of Bokeh” Myth
Before we move further and lead to some disappointment, I’m not going to do a Bokeh comparison here. The term “King Of Bokeh” was mentioned first by Mike Johnston, who later admitted that he almost never shot it past f/5.6. I’m not sure how he came to refer of this 35mm lens as a Bokeh King in the first place, but on his website he makes it clear that this lens is certainly not a Bokeh King!
I called the Leica pre-ASPH 35mm Summicron “the King of bokeh” in a caption in a magazine, and the phrase still pops up from time to time. Well, it ain’t. That lens has very coherent, very pleasing near-o-o-f blur at smaller apertures and middle distances, but at large apertures close-in it sucks.
Now that we took this off the agenda, let me explain how I came to do this comparison and what I’m looking for here.
Leica Glow or Zeiss 3D Pop?
In my early days of film photography, I jumped right in the Leica wagon without looking around. But over the past years, many Contax cameras and their Zeiss lenses have been pilling up on my shelves and without even noticing I got myself surrounded with T* lenses.
This has become a sort of obsession and can’t resist much to hit the Buy button whenever I see a lens or camera with the famous T* coating. This mark means the lens has received a special anti-reflection coating on each glass elements. The coatings are here to optimise light absorption, reduces glare and ghosting at the profit of an increased contrast and saturation.
On some Zeiss Lenses the coating’s effect is more visible than others but to me, it really shines on the Contax T3. We often hear about the “Leica Glow” which I never really noticed myself but we also hear about the “Zeiss 3D Pop”. Zeiss lenses render the light in such a way that it makes it almost like 3D on some images.
To show you what I mean, here’s are two of the very first pictures I shot on Ektar 100 with my T3. I find the effect particularly visible and makes the plane really pop out of the frame.
Every time I get new pictures shot on this camera, I’m always mesmerised by how it renders colours and textures. Even if sharpness doesn’t make a picture but it also shines there, resulting in crisp and fine details. This lens is so good that it made me wonder if my 35mm Summicron could hold up against it.
I’m also trying to shrink down my camera collection and need to decide which camera/lens combo gives me the results I’m the most happy with. Ultimately this will help me deciding which stable should I stick with and bring more consistency in my portfolio. That’s how came up the idea of comparing these two 35mm lenses.
Summicron VS Sonnar
For this experiment, I took with me on a few occasions both cameras loaded with Portra 160. To make this comparison as fair as possible I did my best to match exposures. All these were shot between f/5.6 and f/11 which should be the sweet spot to get the maximum out of both lenses.
Before comparing images, let’s have a quick look at the optical specifications of both lenses:
Specs Aperture Design Blades Minimum Focus Summicron f/2 – f/16 7 elements in 5 groups 10 blades 0.7 meters (18″ or 2.5 feet) Sonnar f/2.8 – f/16 6 elements in 4 groups 5 blades 0.35 meters (13.8″ or 1.75 foot)
Can You Guess The Lens?
This is where the funs begins! Let’s have a look at some samples shot on both cameras. Like I mentioned earlier, these were all taken on Portra 160 and edited as closely as I could while retaining the Portra look.
Then I sent both rolls to my lab Nation Photo who handled the developing and scanning. I got raw scans from them, which I edited identically to get an accurate representation of the character of each lens.
On top you’ll see the pictures taken with camera 1, and at the bottom camera 2. I’ll reveal at the end of this article which was what but I’d love to know what’s your guess and also which one do you prefer. So if you want to play the game, before checking the answer, let me know in the comments what’s your guess. I’m really curious to see if you guys can pick it up!
The Results
Seeing these side by side made me realise how a lens can affect the final image. Even if those two lenses share the same focal, they have different designs, which leads to significant differences on how they capture colours and contrast.
Pictures taken with camera 1 produce warmer tones, lower saturation and contrast, while camera 2 images are a lot cooler, saturated and more contrasted. It’s also hard to tell here because of the web compression but camera 2 is definitely sharper!
So what’s your guess?
Well, camera 1 is the M6 & 35mm Summicron and camera 2 the Contax T3. Did you get it right? Also curious to know if you noticed any other differences between them. The most curious can have a look at this Flickr album with HD versions.
Final Thoughts
This experiment was the opportunity to confirm that I’m leaning toward the Zeiss force more and more. As I’m mentally not prepared to sell my M6, it makes me consider trading my Summicron for the profit of a ZEISS C Biogon T* 2.8/35 ZM which cost about a third of the Leica.
Another Zeiss alternative to the 35mm Summicron is the faster (but heavier) 35mm f/2 Biogon T* ZM, though I’m not sure I really care about the extra stop and prefer to trade it for a slightly smaller and lighter lens. Anyway we’ll see if I find the strength to say goodbye to my trusty Cron 🥺
Finally if you’re looking for cheaper alternative to the Contax T3, check out this list of all 13 Point & Shoot Cameras With Zeiss Lens.
Contax T3 vs Contax G2+G35 vs Leica Minilux vs Minolta TC-1 (Test 1) Photo Gallery by Jacky Lee at pbase.com
Contax T3 vs Contax G2+G35 vs Leica Minilux vs Minolta TC-1 (Test 1)
Contax T3 vs Contax G2+G35 vs Leica Minilux vs Minolta TC-1 Test 1
For your information:
Contax T3: 35mm/f2.8
Contax G2+G35: 35mm/f2.0
Leica Minilux: 40mm/f2.4
Minolta TC-1: 28mm/f3.5
Testing Condition:
RDPIII. f/16. Auto focus. Hand-held. Same object distance of the cameras.
4000dpi with 14 bit and 8x scanning. ICE OFF.
JPEG conversion from TIFF with 12 compression ratio.
Comparison is made by reducing the images into same size.
Contax T3
Contax G2
Leica Minilux
Minolta TC-1
T3
G2 + G35
Minilux
TC-1
Crop 1 (ICE off)
Crop 2 (ICE off)
Crop 3 (ICE off)
Crop 4 (ICE off)
키워드에 대한 정보 leica cm vs contax t3
다음은 Bing에서 leica cm vs contax t3 주제에 대한 검색 결과입니다. 필요한 경우 더 읽을 수 있습니다.
이 기사는 인터넷의 다양한 출처에서 편집되었습니다. 이 기사가 유용했기를 바랍니다. 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오. 매우 감사합니다!
사람들이 주제에 대해 자주 검색하는 키워드 5 Flashship P\u0026S film cameras reviewed | Contax T3 vs. Leica CM vs. Nikon 35ti \u002628ti vs. Minolta TC-1
- 35mm
- film
- Leica
- minilux
- contax
- t3
- t2
- fujifilm
- nikon
- minolta
- p&s camera
- point and shoot
- film photography
5 #Flashship #P\u0026S #film #cameras #reviewed #| #Contax #T3 #vs. #Leica #CM #vs. #Nikon #35ti #\u002628ti #vs. #Minolta #TC-1
YouTube에서 leica cm vs contax t3 주제의 다른 동영상 보기
주제에 대한 기사를 시청해 주셔서 감사합니다 5 Flashship P\u0026S film cameras reviewed | Contax T3 vs. Leica CM vs. Nikon 35ti \u002628ti vs. Minolta TC-1 | leica cm vs contax t3, 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오, 매우 감사합니다.
