당신은 주제를 찾고 있습니까 “martin dcpa4 vs taylor 314ce – Taylor 314ce vs Martin GPCPA4 Comparison“? 다음 카테고리의 웹사이트 https://chewathai27.com/you 에서 귀하의 모든 질문에 답변해 드립니다: https://chewathai27.com/you/blog. 바로 아래에서 답을 찾을 수 있습니다. 작성자 Alamo Music Center 이(가) 작성한 기사에는 조회수 205,741회 및 좋아요 961개 개의 좋아요가 있습니다.
martin dcpa4 vs taylor 314ce 주제에 대한 동영상 보기
여기에서 이 주제에 대한 비디오를 시청하십시오. 주의 깊게 살펴보고 읽고 있는 내용에 대한 피드백을 제공하세요!
d여기에서 Taylor 314ce vs Martin GPCPA4 Comparison – martin dcpa4 vs taylor 314ce 주제에 대한 세부정보를 참조하세요
Chris Mckee compares Taylor’s 314ce to Martin’s GPCPA4. Essentially the same guitar but by different builders.
Free Guitar Buyer’s Guide → https://www.alamomusic.com/discover-musicdont-get-a-good-deal-on-the-wrong-guitar-guitar-buyers-guide/?preview=5ad6a62ac1561
More info available here:
Taylor 314ce: http://store.alamomusic.com/taylor-314-ce-mahogany-grand-auditorium-cutaway-electric/
Martin GPCPA4: http://store.alamomusic.com/martin-performing-artist-series-gpcpa4-grand-performance-acoustic-electric-guitar-natural/
🎼 Contact us: [email protected]
🎵 Call toll-free: (844)251-1922
🎶 Connect: @alamomusic
martin dcpa4 vs taylor 314ce 주제에 대한 자세한 내용은 여기를 참조하세요.
Taylor 314ce v. Martin DCPA4 | The Tone Rooms
Well, it looks like I have boiled it down to these 2 choices. There seem to be better deals on the Martins. Taylor 314ce Martin DCPA4 (I …
Source: www.thetonerooms.com
Date Published: 4/17/2022
View: 7855
MARTIN gpcpa4 Vs. TAYLOR 314ce – Acoustic Guitar Forum
Taylor’s and Martin’s have different tonality – bright vs. deep. That’s their personalities and they should be appreciated and compared with …
Source: www.acousticguitarforum.com
Date Published: 8/15/2021
View: 8304
NGD: WE HAVE A WINNER in the Martin GPCPA4 Sapele …
I’m back and forth between the Martin Rosewood and the 314. The Martin is more balanced, plays really well and is $450 cheaper than the Taylor.
Source: www.thegearpage.net
Date Published: 3/28/2022
View: 7641
Martin DCPA4 vs Martin GPCRSGT vs Taylor 214ce
I was only looking at the all-sol wood Taylor 314ce and Taylor 414ce as comparisons to the Martin DCPA4 and the Martin was my choice, …
Source: umgf.com
Date Published: 2/17/2022
View: 5284
Are Martins better than Taylors? – Theburningofrome.com
Where is the Martin dcpa4 made? … Fishman F1 Analog electronics. Light gauge Martin SP Lifespan phosphor bronze strings. Made in the USA. Where is Taylor 314ce …
Source: www.theburningofrome.com
Date Published: 1/9/2022
View: 8823
Regrets over selling? – Eastman Guitar Fans
Last summer I sold my Taylor 314ce and bought an Eastman AC222ce. … less than $1K) I’ve passed along the Taylor 314ce and a Martin DCPA4, …
Source: www.eastmanguitarfans.com
Date Published: 2/5/2022
View: 8892
Đàn Guitar Acoustic Martin GPCPA4 – Tân Nhạc Cụ
Review Đàn Guitar Martin GPCPA4: Martin GPCPA4 có thân to (grand body) và gỗ thịt (sol tonewood) mang lại âm thanh cực kỳ uy lực. Khác với DCPA4 có dáng D …
Source: tannhaccu.com.vn
Date Published: 5/9/2022
View: 2253
Martin DCPA4 – Natural Reviews – Sweetwater
I tried out 9 guitars before settling on this one. Taylor 314CE, Breedloves,Tak’s Guilds, Baden,Other Martins even Larrivee’s. All great guitar but the DCPA4 …
Source: www.sweetwater.com
Date Published: 7/19/2021
View: 3256
Martin DCPA4-Rosewood – Sammenlign Pris & Køb Her
Find information om, priser på samt forhandlere af Martin DCPA4-Rosewood western-guitar natur … DCPA4-Rosewood. Taylor 314ce V-ClassPris fra: 16.090,00kr.
Source: muuv.dk
Date Published: 5/9/2022
View: 3769
주제와 관련된 이미지 martin dcpa4 vs taylor 314ce
주제와 관련된 더 많은 사진을 참조하십시오 Taylor 314ce vs Martin GPCPA4 Comparison. 댓글에서 더 많은 관련 이미지를 보거나 필요한 경우 더 많은 관련 기사를 볼 수 있습니다.
주제에 대한 기사 평가 martin dcpa4 vs taylor 314ce
- Author: Alamo Music Center
- Views: 조회수 205,741회
- Likes: 좋아요 961개
- Date Published: 2016. 6. 29.
- Video Url link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Dj9BX6bM8o
Taylor 314ce v. Martin DCPA4
To me, it seems like you’ve narrowed the field to winners only.
Close your eyes and pick one, you can’t go wrong with either of these fine acoustics.
Both are built to very high standards, both have excellent tone and will respond very well to setup.
Setup is the key factor in playability. I believe Martins are shipped with their bridges too high, so that the
buyer can tell the seller how he wants it and get it tweaked to exactitude. I’ve read threads on the
Martin forum by players who didn’t know that. *shrugs But I’ve never bought a new one, so I dunno.
Both will likely outlive you and give good service for decades after the power goes out and all
the electric instruments and amps are mere artifacts of the golden age.
Now you just have to play a bunch of them, and buy the one that comes alive in your hands.
You can’t order an acoustic without playing it first. Each one is unique and general statements
about their tone are not valid.
Anyway, what a cool quest to be on! You’ve slain the dragon, stormed the castle, and now there’s a
princess up in each of two towers. Which one do you pursue?
MARTIN gpcpa4 Vs. TAYLOR 314ce
Quote: eden Originally Posted by Hey guys, I can’t decide between these two.. are there any real differences between them that make the Taylor a few hundred bucks more expensive?
I personally don’t feel this particular Martin is much of a guitar at $1199….at every store I picked it up, I was really disappointed…….The action was lacking, playability was average & the neck a little big for me…..To top it all off the guitars really sounded rather anemic……..
I kept giving these guitars a chance only because it said Martin on the headstock. I finally stopped looking at the Martin GPCPA 4, & simply realized this model is not for me at all……My Breedlove American C25 SME is far superior in every regard and I paid $899 new………
On the other hand the 314 CE is an incredible guitar………a great all-purpose guitar…..great action, tone, playability……neck is sweet…….if I didn’t get such a great deal on my Breedlove, the Taylor was my choice, but it was way out of my budget……….
My personal opinion is these two guitars are not even close……the Taylor is superior in all aspects…….I’m guessing you probably need to check out the Martin GPCPA 3 to approach the Taylor 314 CE…..
I would definitely spend the extra money, because to these ears and hands it’s not even close…………. I A/B’d these 2 guitars quite a bit last month when I finally decided on a new Breedlove American C25 SME…(1/2 the price of the Taylor)…..I personally don’t feel this particular Martin is much of a guitar at $1199….at every store I picked it up, I was really disappointed…….The action was lacking, playability was average & the neck a little big for me…..To top it all off the guitars really sounded rather anemic……..I kept giving these guitars a chance only because it said Martin on the headstock. I finally stopped looking at the Martin GPCPA 4, & simply realized this model is not for me at all……My Breedlove American C25 SME is far superior in every regard and I paid $899 new………On the other hand the 314 CE is an incredible guitar………a great all-purpose guitar…..great action, tone, playability……neck is sweet…….if I didn’t get such a great deal on my Breedlove, the Taylor was my choice, but it was way out of my budget……….My personal opinion is these two guitars are not even close……the Taylor is superior in all aspects…….I’m guessing you probably need to check out the Martin GPCPA 3 to approach the Taylor 314 CE…..I would definitely spend the extra money, because to these ears and hands it’s not even close………….
NGD: WE HAVE A WINNER in the Martin GPCPA4 Sapele and Rosewood models vs Taylor 314CE
So I went back to Northeast today to spend some time, with the intention of walking out unless I was certain.I was pretty sure I was going Martin when I walked in. I liked the sapele model a lot, and the $450 price difference with the Taylor was a big deal to me.BUT, the sapele Martin was sold, so it was a rosewood Martin GP (priced at $1399, linked in the first thread, which I liked a little less than the sapele), an OM ($1199) and the Taylor 314ce ($1649).I went into a corner, grabbed all 3 and started playing one off of the others. The OM went back on the wall first. It just didn’t have as full a sound as the others.Going back and forth between the Martin rosewood (which smelled GREAT) and the Taylor 314, here were my thoughts:1) there really wasn’t a whole lot of difference in sound between the two. The Martin was a little fuller and rounder, but not in any great way that I’d been led to expect by the Martin v Taylor stuff I’ve been reading2) Both had great action3) I didn’t like the neck on both Martins as much as I liked the Taylor. The Taylor just felt more comfortable to me.4) I know it’s the Martin style, and I know it goes back a century, but I was really turned off by the Martin headstock and bridge. Hell, *I* can saw it straight across. I know, I know… tradition. I get it. But it looked cheap. and looks counted.After half an hour, Jack came over and said “you’re staring at that Taylor”. I said “yeah, I am”. Jack is a Martin guy, and while I’d never say he was pushing me toward Martin, he’s the smartest guitar guy I know and I trust and value his advice, and I seek it out all the time. But I said “I really think this is the one. I was sure I was walking out with a Martin, but I like the way this one plays the best. The neck is perfect.”And soooo……
Martin DCPA4 vs Martin GPCRSGT vs Taylor 214ce
Let’s start off by saying if I only could have one it would be the Martin DCPA4.
They all have different qualities that make them special.
The USA made Martin DCPA4 has the tone, deep lows and bright highs and it plays very well. For $1499 New it would be hard to find a better guitar.
The Made in Mexico GPCRSGT does not have the projection of the DCPA4 nor the brightness, but it has a pleasant warm tone. It also plays far better than any acoustic I have played yet, the best way I could describe it is light and effortless. For $999 new it would be hard to find an all solid wood guitar with a hardshell case with this quality.
The Taylor 214ce was never a guitar I was even thinking about buying, it has laminate back and sides. I was only looking at the all-solid wood Taylor 314ce and Taylor 414ce as comparisons to the Martin DCPA4 and the Martin was my choice, but there it was, hanging on the wall for a used price of $399 with a hardshell case. It had just had a pro set-up and new Elixir strings. I had to try it, this thing plays as nice as the DCPA4 and has great projection. It is brighter than the Martins (not a bad thing), but I think the strings are part of the reason. I think it has 80/20s and the Martins have Phosphur Bronze.
At this point the only guitar on the fence is the Martin GPCRSGT. It is my favorite guitar playability wise and even though I like the warm tone a lot, I can’t help but wonder if I might be better off returning/exchanging it and later on buying a higher end acoustic, let’s face it, $1000 would get me a good part of the way there.
The Taylor for the $$$ is a steal, I could flip it at any time for more money, makes no sense to get rid of it. It is a great travel and play out guitar.
1st vid gpcrsgt then dcpa4 then taylor
2nd vid taylor then gpcrsgt then dcpa4
Are Martins better than Taylors? – Theburningofrome.com
Are Martins better than Taylors?
Taylors are generally known for having a very bright yet rich sound, with more clarity but perhaps less body than a Martin. The company is also praised for guitar-to-guitar consistency and build quality.
Where is the Martin GPCPA4 made?
USA
Other significant features of the Performing Artist Series Custom GPCPA4 include Hybrid “X” bracing usually found on more expensive models and a durable black Richlite fingerboard. Made in Nazareth, PA, USA.
Is Taylor 314CE good?
Taylor’s 314CE is an excellent candidate for an all-around instrument, and it’s also extraordinarily comfortable to play. And given its sound and build quality, it’s also an excellent value for the money.
Where is the Martin dcpa4 made?
the USA
Fishman F1 Analog electronics. Light gauge Martin SP Lifespan phosphor bronze strings. Made in the USA.
Where is Taylor 314ce made?
There is a lot to love about this relatively expensive acoustic guitar, though — it is made in America (for what it is worth); it has an all solid wood construction; it has premium components. Hardware aside, this guitar boasts more volume, longer sustain, and better intonation.
Is Taylor 314 a solid wood?
A quality acoustic guitar is all about the wood, and the Taylor 314 serves up a classic tonewood cocktail with no compromises. The top is solid Sitka spruce for robust projection and crystalline note clarity.
Are Taylors easier to play than Martins?
Some people find barre chords easier to fret on Taylors because of the slightly smaller radius. The reverse of that is that melody and lead lines might be easier to pick out on the Martin, with the slightly flatter neck.
Are Martin Guitars harder to play than Taylor?
Martin necks are no harder to play than any other acoustic guitar necks. Acoustic guitar necks are all harder to play than electric guitar necks.
Regrets over selling?
#1 Change Avatar rickseast
EGF Member
1 – 3 Posts: 3
Threads: 1
Joined: Apr 2021 I’m glad I found this forum; it’s the perfect place to pose my question.
Last summer I sold my Taylor 314ce and bought an Eastman AC222ce. I’ve now added an AC420ce to my mini collection. I’ve written to Eastman to get a clue (if possible) of the age of the 420. It’s said to have a Fishman pickup, but it’s a different configuration than I’ve seen. It has volume and tone controls on one side of the sound hole and another control on the other (and two coin-shaped batteries on the control board). I don’t think it’s an Enhanced version because ones I’ve seen have a separate component added under the bridge, and this one doesn’t (or I may just be confused about the whole matter).
But that isn’t even my main question! I now have one guitar with ovangkol sides and back and one with rosewood. There is some difference in the sound, but not much. So I’m thinking of trading up from the AC222 to a 322 to have the mahogany (or sapele?) back/sides or getting a different dreadnought, whether Eastman or not, with a different tonewood. I brought home an E2D (cedar top), but the sound was too muted, so it went back (I have an all-mahogany AMI 000m-15 already; also in my mini stable is an A&L Roadhouse parlor). The two shops in my area that carry Eastman don’t have the E6D (mahogany) in stock to try out.
I’m open to suggestions about what to look at, but my main question is this: Which of my guitars am I more likely to regret passing along? This may sound like a silly question, but it’s serious. I’ve been playing only three years, and in my mad search for the perfect guitars (for me, which means less than $2K and preferably less than $1K) I’ve passed along the Taylor 314ce and a Martin DCPA4, both of which have caused some regret. It’s time to settle down with a GA and a dreadnought that will last a long time.
I really like both my Eastman guitars, and I’d rather not be kicking myself for getting rid of one that really should be a keeper. So which might I find more valuable in the long run: the 322ce or the 420ce? There’s no “scientific” answer to this, but I’m interested in the opinions of Eastman lovers. Thanks. Find Reply #2 Change Avatar TomC
EGF Member
74 – 796 Posts: 796
Threads: 74
Joined: May 2018 Rick
I am not sure anyone can answer this for you. I can only speak to my own experience. I started learning to play 4 years ago. In that time I have moved through 23 different guitars for various reasons. I still have 5. And yes I know I have a problem. The only guitar I regret selling was an Eastman AC822CE-Koa and only because I didn’t have it long enough to fully appreciate what it was. And Eastman only made a few so it will be very difficult to replace it in the future. But new furnaces were more important.
I try not to look back but look forward to which new model(s) might interest me. But that works for me.
TomC Pura Vida likes this post It’s half an inch of water and you think you’re gonna drown. John Prine Find Reply #3 Change Avatar rickseast
ThreadStarter
1 – 3 EGF Member Posts: 3
Threads: 1
Joined: Apr 2021 (04-07-2021, 09:15 AM) TomC Wrote: Rick
I am not sure anyone can answer this for you. I can only speak to my own experience. I started learning to play 4 years ago. In that time I have moved through 23 different guitars for various reasons. I still have 5. And yes I know I have a problem. The only guitar I regret selling was an Eastman AC822CE-Koa and only because I didn’t have it long enough to fully appreciate what it was. And Eastman only made a few so it will be very difficult to replace it in the future. But new furnaces were more important.
I try not to look back but look forward to which new model(s) might interest me. But that works for me.
TomC
Thanks for responding. People talk about guitars “opening up” over time (apparently a controversial idea), so I was wondering if there might be a difference in quality of sound over time between rosewood and ovangkol. I think too about salability in the future, whether rosewood, being so popular, would have a longer appeal than ovangkol, or whether the AC dreadnoughts, specifically, might have a certain cachet in time (the old “is older better?” question). Then there’s the quality of the guitars. Some say newer Eastmans are better built. The 222ce is just a year or so old. The 420ce could be five to ten years old (my best guess so far). I named only a Taylor and a Martin that I’ve sold. There have also been a few Yamahas, a couple of Seagulls, a Breedlove, and another Taylor (I’ve been busy). Thanks for responding. People talk about guitars “opening up” over time (apparently a controversial idea), so I was wondering if there might be a difference in quality of sound over time between rosewood and ovangkol. I think too about salability in the future, whether rosewood, being so popular, would have a longer appeal than ovangkol, or whether the AC dreadnoughts, specifically, might have a certainin time (the old “is older better?” question). Then there’s the quality of the guitars. Some say newer Eastmans are better built. The 222ce is just a year or so old. The 420ce could be five to ten years old (my best guess so far). I named only a Taylor and a Martin that I’ve sold. There have also been a few Yamahas, a couple of Seagulls, a Breedlove, and another Taylor (I’ve been busy). Find Reply #4 Change Avatar Meathead
EGF Founder
123 – 1,014 Posts: 1,014
Threads: 123
Joined: Aug 2017 Hey Rick,
Welcome to the forum. As Tom said I think that’s a tough decision that only you’ll fully be able to answer, but if you had to make me choose from a long term value perspective I’d probably lean towards the 420ce because it is a. Rosewood and b. not a model Eastman makes anymore (at least, I don’t think so?)… -Tim
Fingerstyle Guitar on Youtube Find Reply #5 Change Avatar Pura Vida
EGF Moderator
107 – 3,785 Posts: 3,785
Threads: 107
Joined: Sep 2017 Hi, Rick. Echoing the others, it really comes down to your personal preferences. Since we can’t hear the guitars, it’s really difficult to say, as the two have some tradeoffs. I wouldn’t over-think resale, as they’ll both catch fair market prices, when it comes time to sell.
I’d probably lean towards keeping the AC420ce and adding the AC322ce, as I think that’s the stronger combination (Rosewood dread, Mahogany GA; both with built-in electronics). Going the other way, as much as I love the E6D, Ovangkol guitars have never stood out to me in the way that Mahogany and Rosewood do (purely subjective!), and you’d have to add a pickup to the E6D (if that’s important to you).
As for “older is better,” that’s not necessarily true. Older guitars can sound more played in, but after a year with a Sitka top, it should be fairly opened up, and the rest is more of a gradual evolution. In the case of Eastman, their early guitars were more inconsistent, so some people have stuck with newer vintages (myself included). But the good news is that you already own the AC420ce, so you would know if it had any issues, so that should be a non-issue.
Good luck! Hope this helps. “It’s only castles burning.” — Neil Young Find Reply #6 Change Avatar L-Man
EGF Member
8 – 242 Posts: 242
Threads: 8
Joined: Feb 2020 I’ve gone through a good number of guitars as well, and though it is difficult to part with them, life moves on. I had a really great Larrivee L-09 and Taylor 314 (older, no cutaway, no pickup) and both were just amazing guitars.
Eastman guitars have a colorful tone, I like them, I’ve got several around the house right now. But they aren’t going to replace my Brazilian rosewood custom Taylor, or my Martin HD-28. But they are much more affordable than those, too. The Eastman are just as enjoyable to play, but there is something about those other two American guitars that surpasses the Eastmans … but it is an unfair comparison. I have played a good number of Taylors that aren’t as good as the Eastmans I have here. I haven’t played enough Martin guitars to make a sweeping comparison, the HD-28 I have is, I think, one of those rare guitars where the planets were aligned when they made it.
The AC322CE is a lovely sounding instrument. I have a AC422CE here as well to compare it with, and a friend who owns a newer AC422CE with the “forte” inlays (my AC322CE has the same inlays). Mahogany brings a midrange harmonic richness, warmth, and a touch of twang that are very pleasant. The rosewood 422 is stronger, cooler, crisper, with better carrying power. But there isn’t a world of difference between the 322 and 422, and I can see someone choosing the mahogany over the rosewood (as I did … I have other rosewood guitars and wanted something a bit different). 2021 Eastman AC622CE
2021 Eastman PCH3-GACE
2020 Eastman AC322CE
2020 Eastman E40OM
2020 Martin HD-28
2004 Gibson Les Paul Studio, wine red
1999 Taylor 714 custom, Cedar/Brazilian Rosewood Find Reply #7 Change Avatar rickseast
ThreadStarter
1 – 3 EGF Member Posts: 3
Threads: 1
Joined: Apr 2021 (04-07-2021, 06:30 PM) L-Man Wrote: I’ve gone through a good number of guitars as well, and though it is difficult to part with them, life moves on. I had a really great Larrivee L-09 and Taylor 314 (older, no cutaway, no pickup) and both were just amazing guitars.
Eastman guitars have a colorful tone, I like them, I’ve got several around the house right now. But they aren’t going to replace my Brazilian rosewood custom Taylor, or my Martin HD-28. But they are much more affordable than those, too. The Eastman are just as enjoyable to play, but there is something about those other two American guitars that surpasses the Eastmans … but it is an unfair comparison. I have played a good number of Taylors that aren’t as good as the Eastmans I have here. I haven’t played enough Martin guitars to make a sweeping comparison, the HD-28 I have is, I think, one of those rare guitars where the planets were aligned when they made it.
The AC322CE is a lovely sounding instrument. I have a AC422CE here as well to compare it with, and a friend who owns a newer AC422CE with the “forte” inlays (my AC322CE has the same inlays). Mahogany brings a midrange harmonic richness, warmth, and a touch of twang that are very pleasant. The rosewood 422 is stronger, cooler, crisper, with better carrying power. But there isn’t a world of difference between the 322 and 422, and I can see someone choosing the mahogany over the rosewood (as I did … I have other rosewood guitars and wanted something a bit different).
The 322 does look interesting. I hope to get to a shop that carries Eastman tomorrow to see if they have one. The 322 does look interesting. I hope to get to a shop that carries Eastman tomorrow to see if they have one. Find Reply #8 Change Avatar Zeiss
EGF Member
35 – 327 Posts: 327
Threads: 35
Joined: Aug 2019
DON’T SELL !!!
I’ve bought and sold so many and now look back and wish I kept them all .
I’m not really caught up in vintage , it sounds great or it doesn’t . As far as value It’s based off enjoyment. I have some Collings that I would never get back what I payed . But with my new mantra ( DON’T SELL ) I don’t care lol keep them all and don’t upgrade your vehicles as soon I can sayDON’T SELL !!!I’ve bought and sold so many and now look back and wish I kept them all .I’m not really caught up in vintage , it sounds great or it doesn’t . As far as value It’s based off enjoyment. I have some Collings that I would never get back what I payed . But with my new mantra ( DON’T SELL ) I don’t care lol keep them all and don’t upgrade your vehicles as soon Find Reply #9 Change Avatar AlanSam
EGF Member
148 – 1,421 Posts: 1,421
Threads: 148
Joined: Apr 2018 It’s so refreshing to find someone with sensible priorities! sleigh likes this post Alan
”Bad company done got me here …” – Rev Gary Davis Find Reply
Đàn Guitar Acoustic Martin GPCPA4
Đàn Guitar Martin GPCPA4 là 1 trong 3 model cao cấp nhất thuộc Performing Series (dòng Biểu diễn) của Martin với những chức năng phục vụ tốt nhất cho người chơi trên sân khấu chuyên nghiệp.
Hai model còn lại là DCPA4 và OMCPA4
Review Đàn Guitar Martin GPCPA4:
Martin GPCPA4 có thân to (grand body) và gỗ thịt (solid tonewood) mang lại âm thanh cực kỳ uy lực. Khác với DCPA4 có dáng D và OMCPA4 có dáng OM, GPCPA4 mang dáng Grandautorium, một kiểu dáng rất đặc biệt, dành riêng cho những ai thích âm thanh đầy uy lực.
Martin Performing Artist Series GPCPA4 Acoustic Electric Guitar
Thêm vào đó, lưng và hông đàn được làm từ gỗ African Sapele, càng làm tăng thêm độ uy lực cho tiếng đàn. Loại gỗ này được sử dụng cho các model cao cấp của Taylor như 314ce-N. Đôi khi nhiều người nhầm loại gỗ này sang gỗ Dái Ngựa Châu Phi (African Mahogany) vì những đặc điểm khá tương đồng. Tuy nhiên, Sapele có độ bền cao hơn Mahogany. Nó làm được mọi điều mà gỗ Mahogany làm được và còn làm tốt hơn nữa.
Martin GPCPA4: Trợ thủ đắc lực trên sân khấu
Ngoài một số khác biệt trên, cũng giống như 2 model còn lại, GPCPA4 được thiết kế hoàn hảo cho người chơi trên sân khấu. Nếu bạn đang tìm một cây đàn guitar phục vụ cho mục đích chơi trên sân khấu chuyên nghiệp, với hệ thống EQ hàng đầu, âm thanh trầm ấm uy lực, chơi dễ dàng khi solo hoặc đệm… thì GPCPA4 được thiết kế cho bạn.
Martin GPCPA4 – “perfect for any performing artist”
Dáng khuyết, cần đàn được thiết kế giúp nghệ sỹ chơi tốt khi thao tác các kỹ thuật cao, đòi hỏi tốc độ nhanh, EQ F1 Analog của Fishman… GPCPA4 được Martin giới thiệu là “perfect for any performing artist”.
Thông số kỹ thuật Đàn Guitar Martin GPCPA4:
Model: GPCPA4
Construction: Simple Dovetail Neck Joint
Body Size: Grand Performance 14 Fret Cutaway
Top Material: Sitka Spruce
Top Detail: N/A
Rosette: Multi-Stripe
Bracing Pattern: X Brace
Brace Shape: Scalloped
Brace Material: Sitka Spruce
Brace Size: 5/16″ with 1/4″ Tone Bars
Back Material: Sapele
Back Detail: N/A
Back Purfling/Strip: N/A
Side Material: Sapele
Side Detail: N/A
Endpiece: N/A
Endpiece Inlay: N/A
Binding: Black
Top Inlay Material: N/A
Side Inlay Material: N/A
Back Inlay Material: N/A
Neck Material: Select Hardwood
Neck Shape: Performing Artist
Neck Taper: High Performance Taper
Plek: Yes
Nut Material: White Corian
Headstock Shape: Solid with Square Taper and Square Corners
Headplate Material: East Indian Rosewood
Headplate Detail: N/A
Headplate Logo Style: Script Overlay
Headplate Binding Material: N/A
Heelcap: East Indian Rosewood
Fingerboard Material: FSC® Certified Richlite
Scale Length: 25.4″
Neck Joins Body At: 14th Fret
Number of Frets Total: 20
Fingerboard Width at Nut: 1 3/4”
Fingerboard Width at 12th Fret: 2 1/8”
Fingerboard Inlay Material: White Plastic
Fingerboard Inlay Style: Off-set Dots
Fingerboard Binding Material: N/A
Side Dots: White
Back and Side Finish: Satin
Back and Sides Color: Translucent Cherry
Finish Top: Gloss
Top Color: Clear
Finish Neck: Satin
Neck Color: Translucent Cherry
Bridge Material: FSC® Certified Richlite
Bridge Style: Modern Belly
Bridge String Spacing: 2 5/32″
Saddle: Compensated White Tusq
Saddle Radius: 16″
Tuning Machines: Chrome Enclosed Gear
Recommended Strings: SP LIFESPAN 92/8 PHOSPHOR BRONZE LIGHT (MSP7100)
Knob: Large
Bridge Pin Material: White Plastic
Bridge Pin Dots: Black Plastic
Pickguard: Faux Tortoise
Pickguard Inlay: N/A
Case: Ply Hardshell
Label: N/A
Electronics: Fishman F1 Analog
Left Handed Availability: Yes
Liên hệ:
Số 565 Hoàng Hoa Thám, Ba Đình, Hà Nội.
Số 2 Vĩnh Phúc, Ba Đình, Hà Nội.
– Hotline: 091.555.0103
Số 250 Cách Mạng Tháng 8, Phường 10, Quận 3, TP.HCM. (Cách vòng xoay Dân Chủ 500m về phía Bảy Hiền).
– Hotline: 0947.351.622
*Bài viết do Tân Nhạc Cụ tuyển chọn, biên dịch. Mọi sự sao chép phải được sự đồng ý bằng văn bản của Tân Nhạc Cụ.
Martin DCPA4 – Natural Reviews
Highest Rated Reviews Highest Rated Date
Awesome Guitar! By Arnie from Seaside, CA on June 3, 2019
Flawless By Tony Tuper from Borden, IN on December 9, 2018
Beautiful! By Mike from Tennessee on October 30, 2018 Music Background: Professional hobbyist (LOL)
Super By Don Dreffs from Mi. on October 22, 2018 Music Background: Hacker
Performing Artist By RK from Chicago on October 5, 2016
best guitar for the price By Nick from New York on October 16, 2015
MARTIN DCPA4 By joshua graber from United States on December 11, 2014 Music Background: BLUEGRASS GOSPEL
DCPA4 By Roger Williams from Nashville, TN on October 4, 2014 Music Background: Hobbyist
I love this guitar!!! By Tom Rodrigues from Florida on September 13, 2014 Music Background: Born to Play
MARTIN DCPA4 ROSEWOOD By John Sanza from Erie, PA on July 1, 2014 Music Background: Hobbyist
Martin DCPA4 By Floyd Shatto from Cookson, Oklahoma on January 20, 2014 Music Background: Hobbyist
This six string delivers… By Joe DeMandel from Swansboro, NC USA on December 13, 2013 Music Background: Hobbyist
Martin DCPA4 Rosewood By Richard the Elder from Atlanta on September 6, 2013 Music Background: Amateur with no training
great sound By Mike Burden from Pensacola, Florida on January 14, 2013 Music Background: just play for fun
Cant be beat for Quality & Money!! By Dan Fuentes from Minnesota on July 18, 2012 Music Background: 30 yrs of playing, hobbyist, student
Martin Performing Artist DCPA4 By Daniel Stapleton from United States on April 26, 2012 Music Background: semi pro
Amazing sound By LeRoy Lewis from Virginia Beach, VA on March 17, 2012 Music Background: Hobbyist
Martin DCPA 4 By Rob from nj on March 4, 2012 Music Background: 14, years
Martin DCPA4 is fantastic By Jon D from Cayman Islands on September 30, 2011 Music Background: Gigged as a lad, strummed as an older lad. Love home recording/jammin
The Harley Of The Workingman Acoustics By Paul Stockwicz from Schaghticoke, NY on March 10, 2011 Music Background: Professional Musician
Great Sound, Build and Value By Richard from Central New Hampshire on November 2, 2013 Music Background: Hobbyist
SAVE YOUR DOUGH AND GET THIS ONE By C. Carr from Cherrly Plain, NY on April 16, 2012 Music Background: former bandmember, now just a picker
Heres the bad news… By Sweetwater Customer on September 3, 2020
Martin DCPA4-Rosewood
Find information om, priser på samt forhandlere af Martin DCPA4-Rosewood western-guitar natur – Western-guitar i natur af mærket Martin. Produktet findes hos en forhandler, hvor prisen er 16.168,00 kr.
Husk altid at dobbelttjekke produktinfo, tilgængelighed og pris hos selve forhandleren. Vi tager forbehold for, at der kan forekomme pris- og trykfejl. MUUV sælger ikke selv ovenstående produkter – så søg derfor information hos din ønskede forhandler, hvis det skulle blive nødvendigt.
Anmeldelser
Der er endnu ikke lavet en anmeldelse af Martin DCPA4-Rosewood. Hvis du har erfaringer med produktet, kan du hjælpe andre musikere ved at skrive en anmeldelse.
Anmeld produktet
키워드에 대한 정보 martin dcpa4 vs taylor 314ce
다음은 Bing에서 martin dcpa4 vs taylor 314ce 주제에 대한 검색 결과입니다. 필요한 경우 더 읽을 수 있습니다.
이 기사는 인터넷의 다양한 출처에서 편집되었습니다. 이 기사가 유용했기를 바랍니다. 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오. 매우 감사합니다!
사람들이 주제에 대해 자주 검색하는 키워드 Taylor 314ce vs Martin GPCPA4 Comparison
- yt:quality=high
- martin
- CF Martin Co
- dreadnought
- Taylor
- Taylor Guitars
- Martin Guitars
- corona
- California
- cutaway
- s1
- preamp
- full sound
- acoustic
- pricepoint
- comparison
- acoustic guitar
Taylor #314ce #vs #Martin #GPCPA4 #Comparison
YouTube에서 martin dcpa4 vs taylor 314ce 주제의 다른 동영상 보기
주제에 대한 기사를 시청해 주셔서 감사합니다 Taylor 314ce vs Martin GPCPA4 Comparison | martin dcpa4 vs taylor 314ce, 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오, 매우 감사합니다.
