당신은 주제를 찾고 있습니까 “skill attack ddr – 【DDR A3】Surface / ESP LV12【PLAY MOVIE】“? 다음 카테고리의 웹사이트 https://chewathai27.com/you 에서 귀하의 모든 질문에 답변해 드립니다: https://chewathai27.com/you/blog. 바로 아래에서 답을 찾을 수 있습니다. 작성자 ろーたすチャンネル 이(가) 작성한 기사에는 조회수 18회 및 좋아요 없음 개의 좋아요가 있습니다.
skill attack ddr 주제에 대한 동영상 보기
여기에서 이 주제에 대한 비디오를 시청하십시오. 주의 깊게 살펴보고 읽고 있는 내용에 대한 피드백을 제공하세요!
d여기에서 【DDR A3】Surface / ESP LV12【PLAY MOVIE】 – skill attack ddr 주제에 대한 세부정보를 참조하세요
PLAYER:LOTUS.
DDR CODE:2115-1660
Skill Attack:1510↑
【チャンネル登録はこちら】Please subscribe to my channel
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbmb-eNL8vfbOEoImC2F6lg?view_as=subscriber?sub_confirmation=1
【Twitter】Twitter is here
https://twitter.com/lotus_musicgame
【他のプレイ動画はこちら】Click here for playlist
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWfCy5Wxfb2YQuaMP7dLRfXc9hAzUKqmy
#DanceDanceRevolution
#DDR
#音ゲー
skill attack ddr 주제에 대한 자세한 내용은 여기를 참조하세요.
Skill Attack
Name, Skill Point, Single 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 … 2022/07/26 21:24, DDR을 잘하고 싶다!!(DDRを上手になりたい!!)
Source: skillattack.com
Date Published: 8/28/2022
View: 9736
voltroom Skill Attack 1400 point live reaction – YouTube
What a cracked year for my DDR improvement lmao. When will I ever reach 1500? I don’t know, but I know for sure it won’t happen too soon.
Source: www.youtube.com
Date Published: 6/29/2021
View: 3476
How is total skill attack calculated? : r/DanceDanceRevolution
Is total skill attack basically the sum of all the points earned … r/DanceDanceRevolution – Canonical “Is There a DDR Machine Near Me?”.
Source: www.reddit.com
Date Published: 9/5/2021
View: 1240
DDR Skill Attack
One inconvenience is that DDR (and by extension, tools like Score Manager A and DDR Skill Attack that primarily interact with e-Amusement Basic Course as an …
Source: ddr.kitaru.online
Date Published: 2/26/2022
View: 1007
주제와 관련된 이미지 skill attack ddr
주제와 관련된 더 많은 사진을 참조하십시오 【DDR A3】Surface / ESP LV12【PLAY MOVIE】. 댓글에서 더 많은 관련 이미지를 보거나 필요한 경우 더 많은 관련 기사를 볼 수 있습니다.
주제에 대한 기사 평가 skill attack ddr
- Author: ろーたすチャンネル
- Views: 조회수 18회
- Likes: 좋아요 없음
- Date Published: 2022. 4. 25.
- Video Url link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVHUj0lg6mA
How is total skill attack calculated? : DanceDanceRevolution
Translating the information page helps a bit but wanted some clarification
Is total skill attack basically the sum of all the points earned from each song you scored on? So if you only ever played, let’s say, three level 15 songs on your amuse and got MFCs on those, your total skill attack would then be 135?
Also, is Single AA and Double AA line just the level difficulty? How is the difficulty calculated? What does AA stand for?
And how does Marvelous Attack affect your total skill attack?
Sorry for noob questions. I will give you an upvote and a comment of appreciation if you help ty
Work In Progress DDR BPI index and tier list
Aggregated scoring data and tier list views in Google Sheets (SP view – DP view)
Sheets for SP 12-19 and DP 12-19 also available in document linked above
Above documents subject to change per improvements to the programs that generated them. Also bear in mind caveats raised later in the document regarding bpi/tier inflation for unlocks, extra exclusives, workarounds for handling MFC ties, etc..
(TODO: possibly collect, upload, and link various other files — Python scripts, score HTMLs, SM files sourced from truebpm and elsewhere, the resulting JSONs with note data generated by smdataset, etc.)
See also other work in progress: Skill Attack score analyzer – instructions
What is BPI?
IIDX Beat Power Indicator (BPI) was a system created by DJ Nori to compare the quality of scores between different songs with different notecounts. The formula produces a measure of the strength of a relative score given only four straightforward variables: the score to evaluate, kaiden average score, world record score, and maximum achievable score.
BPI follows a logarithmic progression with the kaiden average score assigned a value of 0 BPI, and the world record assigned a value of 100. A central concept of BPI is that it becomes exponentially more difficult to marginally raise a score as you approach the upper limit; the ratio of Just Greats to regular Greats must increase considerably.
Rather than spend a lot of time re-iterating in detail the motivation behind BPI and the math that supports it, here are some links to existing resources:
How can we use BPI for DDR?
While we do have access to world records for every song chart, DDR does not have something equivalent to the “kaiden average” pacemaker to use as a source of data for BPI calculations. However, we do have an excellent source of player-submitted scores. DDR Skill Attack by @hiro_ddr is a site that implements a player rating system similar to GitaDora’s Skill Point. It also offers leaderboards for every song and chart in the game. Given that it has been adopted by players of a wide range of skill (from intermediate level to top rankers), it offers a nice sample of the overall playerbase.
One inconvenience is that DDR (and by extension, tools like Score Manager A and DDR Skill Attack that primarily interact with e-Amusement Basic Course as an alternative to manual data entry) track records in terms of weighted “money” score rather than EX score. Because the scoring weights for Perfect, Great, etc. can vary based on notecount, it’s important to re-normalize the scores to fixed-weight EX scores.
Thankfully, the scoring system in current versions of DDR makes it easy to determine EX from Perfect Full Combo scores, as well as get reasonable estimates of EX breakdowns for other general scores. (I’m continuing to experiment with estimating the proportion of greats vs. perfects vs. marvelouses etc., but I feel the basic method works well enough to use in BPI calculations for now. See “DDR scoring math” section later in the document for details. I came up with an estimation method that tackles from the opposite direction; given the premise that player timing will tend to fit a normal distribution, we can search for the value of standard deviation in frames that produce a set of judgements that fit the given money score. See “Estimating EX” section later in the document.)
Using BPI to create a “scoring difficulty” tier list
As Exy touches on in his presentation on BPI, we can use a BPI calculator to examine how hard it is to achieve a given grade/percentage between different songs — we simply use the percentage of max EX for each song as the score value input in the BPI function. As such, we can create a tier list by sorting all songs by the BPI for achieving a given percent score.
Minor note: since grades in DDR are based on money score, we can’t exactly compare the difficulty to achieve AAA, AA+, etc. on a given song; the percentage of EX represented by a grade will vary from song to song based on the total number of notes in each. Instead, we should create our tier list based on a fixed percentage of EX.
In the current state of the tier list I created, I chose to compare BPI to achieve 90% EX on all charts. I chose this threshold as (at least given the current money-to-EX estimation method) it has been achieved on the majority of charts. I wanted to select a percentage high enough to properly compare high-level scores while limiting the number of ties that must be broken by other means.
(If the selected percentage is above the world record, then the BPI calculator will just return 100. However, we could also either use a secondary sorting criteria or write a modified version of BPI for tier list generation that accounts for how much a given score would exceed the current world record. For now, in order to break the three-way tie at the top, I’m adding the result of a second BPI calculation with 90% EX compared to a lower bound of the world record and an upper bound of the max score; this should give a rough sense of the effort to exceed the current world record by that amount of EX.)
Exy also notes that BPI is sensitive to changes in the server record; as such, so is our tier list. For instance, if a particular chart has not been played often or very seriously by top rankers, the underdeveloped world record can reflect in an overrated position in the overall tier list. However, within the scope of a given difficulty folder, its position should give a good sense of how challenging it is to achieve a strong score.
Moreover, any songs that are currently (or have recently been) restricted to Extra Exclusive overrated due to the additional challenge of playing on Life 4; many players will not be able to clear the majority of the chart to set a strong average. Similarly, it’s also worth noting that IIDX allows players to play through to the end of a chart on normal lifebar and save a score, whereas DDR only saves a score up until the point that the lifebar is exhausted. On one hand, a low average on an song that is incredibly difficult to survive may in some sense be justified. On the other hand, inability to save a score beyond the point of failure represents a loss of information in how difficult it is to score on the chart overall.
Another caveat is that many more songs in DDR have been maxed multiple times over; this represents a type of “information ceiling” with regards to how hard a song is to score. However, we can account for this by using a weighted BPI for songs that have been maxed more than once. The method I’ve chosen for the time being is to invert the “BPI to estimated player rank” function from Norimiso’s BPI info page to break the multi-way tie. If 10 players have MFC’d a song, then we can calculate the hypothetical BPI for achieving 10th place out of that particular song’s overall player count. I then use this “10th place tie BPI” in place of the previous max value of 100. (We can also use extend this weighting concept to “negative BPI” by multiplying by 100 divided by the “new max value.”)
These caveats aside, it’s quite nice to be able to automatically generate a rough tier list based on real scoring data. 🙂
Estimating EX
In my initial draft of the BPI spreadsheet, the scripts I wrote were attempting to back-calculate money score into judgement breakdowns in order to estimate EX score. The drawback to this approach is that there are many different ways to distribute the judgements and achieve the same money score. In order for money score reverse engineering to be viable, a good method of pruning away outlier distributions or hill climbing to one with the best fit to a normal distribution would be necessary. (Information about this back-calculation approach can still be read in the “DDR Scoring math” section below.)
Instead, in the current draft of the scripts, I approach the problem from the opposite direction; given the premise that most players’ timing will tend to follow a normal distribution, and given a hypothetical set of timing windows (I’m using the ones mined from DDR Extreme) we can search for the standard deviation from ±0.0ms that will produce the best fitting judgements to the observed target score.
I start with an arbitrary value for standard deviation and iterate from there. For each timing window “bucket,” I calculate the value of the cumulative distribution function for a normal distribution given a mean value of 0 (i.e., centered on “true marvelous”) and the hypothetical standard deviation to test. I then take the difference between each bucket to get a rough percentage of each judgement “observed” and multiply those percentages by the notecount. Given these estimated judgement breakdowns, I can calculate money score and EX score as usual. I choose a standard deviation very near zero (i.e., consistent MFC timing) and iterate via gradient descent, with target_score – hypothetical_score as the value to minimize.
To give an example, let’s take a score of 993,870 on In Between ESP, which has 471 scoring targets. Let’s say that the real results screen showed 368 Marvelous + OK, 97 Perfect, and 6 Great, for a total of 1304 EX. The money-to-EX estimation process described above will come up with an estimate of ~370.53 Marvelous + OK, ~94.44 Perfect, and ~6.03 Great, for an estimated ~1306.49 EX.
Left: graph of observed judgements
Right: graph of our estimated distribution (standard deviation of ~0.80355 frames ≈ 13.39ms)
This is a seems fairly reasonable for a quick estimate, without the need to consider the complexities and computational expense of back-calculating a list of possible real judgement breakdowns and searching for one with the best fit to a normal distribution.
Let’s take a look at a far less optimized score as well: 706,970 on Valkyrie Dimension CSP, which has 756 scoring targets. Let’s say the results screen showed 241 Marvelous + OK, 146 Perfect, 210 Great, 64 Good, and 73 Miss, for a total of 1245 EX. Given that this looks like a barely passing score, it stands to reason that the estimation will not be quite as tight. The result produced is ~151.65 Marvelous + OK, ~142.22 Perfect, ~387 Great, ~62.60 Good, and ~11.93 Miss, for a 1126.98 EX.
Left: graph of observed judgements
Right: graph of our estimated distribution (standard deviation of ~3.93521 frames ≈ 65.57ms)
It’s clear that using this estimation method will result in judgement breakdowns don’t account as well for a higher volume of notes being outright missed (as may be the case in very difficult song) than would be observed in a truly normal distribution. The estimated distribution will have fewer Marvelous (given that the distribution will flatten in such a way that will favor the Great window) and far fewer Miss (given that it’s an extreme outlier in the timing windows, rather than a result that would occur often if a player was able to read and execute on every note equally well). However, it’s somewhat interesting to see that the Perfect and Good judgements are actually quite close to reality. It’s ultimately not as tight of a fit as our other estimate, but the difference between the real value of 54.89% EX vs. an estimated 49.69% EX (~5.2% difference) at least gets us in the right ballpark to provide a lower bound for BPI calculation.
At the end of the day, we have to come to terms with the fact that, when working with money score when we’d rather have EX, we’re dealing with an unavoidable loss of information. We’re fortunate that Perfect Full Combo scores can be trivially converted to EX, and that other relatively high scores can be estimated fairly accurately. With barely passing (or even failing) scores, we’ll just need to move on knowing that the bounds on accuracy will necessarily decrease and that ultimately our estimate is just an estimate.
DDR Scoring math
The DDR money score system works as follows:
maximum achievable score in a song = 1000000 points
scores always end in 0
Any remainder in the ones digit or beyond the decimal point appear to be floored away. Points must add up to the next tens digit before affecting the score counter. Thanks to hnkul for sharing their score calculator, it helped me work out issues in my previous reverse calculation method.
value of Marvelous or OK = 1000000 points / number of scoring “targets”
a single step is naturally a single target
a jump is also counted as a single target, not two
getting an OK at the tail of a freeze arrow is one target
note: in current DDR, a jump freeze only awards one OK, not two
if one arrow in a jump freeze ends before the other, it will show a “success” flash indicating this half of the jump freeze resolved, but the OK judgement is only awarded when the other arrow’s freeze tail is reached (see: Endymion CSP before combo 20)
getting an OK for avoiding a shock arrow is, unsurprisingly, one scoring target
Other judgements award some percentage of Marvelous, minus 10 points
Values are assigned as follows:
Perfect = Marvelous – 10
Great = Marvelous * 60% – 10
Good = Marvelous * 20% – 10
Miss or NG = 0
Potentially useful property: aside from the -10, Great is worth 40% less than Perfect and 40% more than Good. The absolute value of points that a Great loses relative to a Perfect is the same as the absolute value of points that a Great gains relative to a Good.
Given above, we can estimate judgement breakdowns by examining the number of points that were subtracted from maximum scoring potential.
My initial, simple method, assuming a Great Full Combo (or of quality above “Great Attack Full Combo”):
point loss = 1000000 – score
Great count = floor(point loss / Great value)
(you can adjust the distribution of Great/Perfect/Marvelous judgements by subtracting from the Great count; this is an topic for further experimentation)
Perfect count = (point loss – (Great value * Great count)) / 10
Marvelous/OK count = total number of “targets” – Perfect count – Great count
(caveat: although it should not happen unless the Great/Perfect distribution is adjusted, technically this value can be less than zero; negative Marvelous counts can be clamped to zero and considered Misses)
We can expand the simple method to examine other Marvelous/Perfect/Great breakdowns, or scores with Goods instead of Greats, or Misses instead of either.
This is able to more accurately model some scores that were impossible to match exactly with Greats alone. For the scores that still can’t be modeled with this narrow approach, we can fall back on a simple/inaccurate estimation for the time being.
This method still doesn’t account for non-completion scores, which might explain difficulties in finding a breakdown for the missed points that adds up to the notecount when using this simple approach.
Assist clears are probably also going to be undetectable.
I’m still trying to come up with a method that can quickly sieve through more granular combinations of all judgement types. I feel like a nice pruning criteria or dynamic programming solution may present itself.
Weighting the average of the expanded list of potential judgement counts is an open question.
Most judgement distributions likely follow a normal curve, higher scores are likely made up of Perfects/Greats vs. equivalent scores with Misses, etc.
For now I’m selecting the “maximized” EX count — the most Greats, the most Goods, or the most Misses that can allow the score to be represented with the rest being Perfects and Marvelouses/OKs. It probably over-values a lot of things, but at least it’s a consistent method for the time being.
The mean average of a sample of scores is not itself necessarily a real, achievable money score. This can cause issues in assigning an appropriate EX estimation, especially on songs with very few notes due to the low granularity in scoring. However, we can mitigate issues in calculation by selecting two real scores above and below the mean, estimating their EX, and averaging the two EX estimates.
키워드에 대한 정보 skill attack ddr
다음은 Bing에서 skill attack ddr 주제에 대한 검색 결과입니다. 필요한 경우 더 읽을 수 있습니다.
이 기사는 인터넷의 다양한 출처에서 편집되었습니다. 이 기사가 유용했기를 바랍니다. 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오. 매우 감사합니다!
사람들이 주제에 대해 자주 검색하는 키워드 【DDR A3】Surface / ESP LV12【PLAY MOVIE】
- 동영상
- 공유
- 카메라폰
- 동영상폰
- 무료
- 올리기
【DDR #A3】Surface #/ #ESP #LV12【PLAY #MOVIE】
YouTube에서 skill attack ddr 주제의 다른 동영상 보기
주제에 대한 기사를 시청해 주셔서 감사합니다 【DDR A3】Surface / ESP LV12【PLAY MOVIE】 | skill attack ddr, 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오, 매우 감사합니다.
