You are looking for information, articles, knowledge about the topic nail salons open on sunday near me super takumar 35mm f2 on Google, you do not find the information you need! Here are the best content compiled and compiled by the https://chewathai27.com/to team, along with other related topics such as: super takumar 35mm f2 super takumar 35mm f2 radioactive, super takumar 35mm f2 review, Takumar 35mm f2, Super Takumar 35mm f3 5, Super Takumar 105mm f2 8, Takumar 35mm f2 3, takumar 35mm f2 flickr, Takumar 55mm f2
S-M-C/Super Takumar 35mm F2 Reviews – M42 Screwmount Wide-Angle Primes – Pentax Lens Reviews & Lens Database
- Article author: www.pentaxforums.com
- Reviews from users: 43591
Ratings - Top rated: 4.8
- Lowest rated: 1
- Summary of article content: Articles about S-M-C/Super Takumar 35mm F2 Reviews – M42 Screwmount Wide-Angle Primes – Pentax Lens Reviews & Lens Database The built quality is outstanding and focusing is as smooth as it can get. There´s also nothing to moan about it´s optical qualitys. But it´s … …
- Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for S-M-C/Super Takumar 35mm F2 Reviews – M42 Screwmount Wide-Angle Primes – Pentax Lens Reviews & Lens Database The built quality is outstanding and focusing is as smooth as it can get. There´s also nothing to moan about it´s optical qualitys. But it´s … Pentax 35mm, Pentax 35mm Review, S-M-C/Super Takumar 35mm F2, Pentax M42 lenses, Pentax Lens Reviews, Pentax Lens, Review, Specifications, Lens DatabaseS-M-C/Super Takumar 35mm F2 lens reviews and detailed specifications. This is the faster version of the 35mm screwmount lens. Two models were made over time with differen
- Table of Contents:
super takumar 35mm f2
- Article author: shopee.vn
- Reviews from users: 36089 Ratings
- Top rated: 4.3
- Lowest rated: 1
- Summary of article content: Articles about super takumar 35mm f2 Lens 35mm m42 1. Yashinon DX 35 2.8, lens hình thức và kính ok, nhỏ nhẹ, nét, màu đẹp. Giá: 1,6t 2. Takumar 35 2.3 khá huyền thoại khi cho bokeh vảy cá, … …
- Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for super takumar 35mm f2 Lens 35mm m42 1. Yashinon DX 35 2.8, lens hình thức và kính ok, nhỏ nhẹ, nét, màu đẹp. Giá: 1,6t 2. Takumar 35 2.3 khá huyền thoại khi cho bokeh vảy cá, …
- Table of Contents:
Takumar 35mm F2 – Etsy
- Article author: www.etsy.com
- Reviews from users: 12041 Ratings
- Top rated: 3.4
- Lowest rated: 1
- Summary of article content: Articles about Takumar 35mm F2 – Etsy Check out our takumar 35mm f2 selection for the very best in unique or … Vintage 35 mm film camera Pentax ASAHI S1a with Super-Takumar 55 mm f2 lens. …
- Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for Takumar 35mm F2 – Etsy Check out our takumar 35mm f2 selection for the very best in unique or … Vintage 35 mm film camera Pentax ASAHI S1a with Super-Takumar 55 mm f2 lens. Check out our takumar 35mm f2 selection for the very best in unique or custom, handmade pieces from our lenses & filters shops.
- Table of Contents:
Find something memorable
join a community doing good
Petri 35mm F28 Auto Prime Lens for Universal Screw Mount with Rear Cap
Fujica ST605 35mm camera – 55mm f22 lens – Vintage SLR m42 Mount Camera
JCPenney Diamatic 28mm f28 M42 Screw Mount Lens
Beautiful Vintage Like New Ricoh Singlex TLS 35mm SLR Film Camera Bundle with 55mm f2 Lens Tested Works
Kamero 35mm f28 M42 Mount Intermediate Wide Angle Lens
SMC Pentax-M 28mm f28 Vintage Lens Mint Condition
Soligor 35mm F28 M42 lens
Vintage 35 mm film camera Pentax ASAHI S1a with Super-Takumar 55 mm f2 lens
Vintage Meyer Optik Gorlitz Red V Trioplan 2950mm f29 50mm Analog Camera Lens mount Altix 12 blades
Pentax SUPER-TAKUMAR 55mm f18 with M42 Mount with original cap – in Good Condition!
Super Takumar Asahi 55mm f2 M42 Pentax lens Perfect for full frame conversion or vintage slr
Pentax SP500 Vintage 35mm Film Camera with Takumar 55mm f2 Super Multi Coated Prime Lens
Near Mint Serviced Pentax H1a 35mm SLR Film Camera + Super Takumar 55mm f2 Lens + Pental Metal Lens Cap + Leather Neck Strap- Film Tested
Honeywell Pentax H1a 35mm SLR camera with attached Light Meter 55mm f20 Takumar Lens strap case and front lens cap
Tamron 24mm F25 compact super-wide angle lens Adaptall-2 mount system for Pentax-K
Pentax ESII camera with SMC Takumar 55mm f2 lens – 85% condition
Pentax K 135mm f25 Takumar Fast Telephoto Prime Lens AOC 4 Students K1000 SLR DSLR MiNTY REaLLY NiCE!
Pentax 55mm f20 SMC Takumar Lens for Spotmatic M42 Mount
Focal MC 28mm f28 – Pentax m42 – 35mm film camera lens
Asahi Pentax SP500 55MM f2 Super Takumar Lens & Case VGC New Weincell Battery
Pentax Takumar 105mm f28 – Pentax M42 – 35mm film camera lens
Beautiful Rare Vintage Vivitar 135mm f28 Prime Fast 35mm Film Manual Lens For M42 mount Very Clean
Vintage 35 mm film camera Pentax SP 1000 with Super-Takumar 55 mm f2 lens
Auto Revuenon MC 50mm F14 Vintage Lens for Pentax Mount
Miranda OM 24mm f28 – OM Mount – 35mm film camera lens
Pentax K1000 35mm camera – SMC M 50mm f2 lens – Vintage SLR K-Mount Camera
Pentax Takumar 135mm f35 Vintage M42 Lens
Pentax MX 35mm camera – SMC A 50mm f2 lens – Vintage SLR K-Mount Camera
Vintage 35 mm film camera Pentax ASAHI SV with Super-Takumar 55 mm f2 lens
Asahi Pentax H2 with legendary Super-Takumar 55mm f2 M42 lens in lovely brown leather case In Great condition These are super collectable
Pentax A3000 – 35mm camera – SMC 50mm f2 lens – Vintage SLR K-Mount Camera
Vivitar 400 SL 35mm camera – 55mm f28 lens – Vintage SLR m42 Mount Camera
Sunset 135mm f28 – Pentax M42 – 35mm film camera lens
SMC Pentax-M 50mm f14 Vintage Lens Mint Condition
Pentax ASAHI SP500 with Super-Takumar 55 mm f2 lens
Pentax MX 35mm camera – SMC A 50mm f2 lens – Vintage SLR K-Mount Camera
Kalimar 50mm f28 – Minolta MD – 35mm film camera lens
Pentax K 135mm f28 Takumar Fast Telephoto Prime Lens AOC 4 Students K1000 SLR DSLR MiNTY REaLLY NiCE!
Pentax-m SMC 135mm f28 Pentax k mount telephoto lens
Ricoh Rikenon 50mm f20 pentax k mount lens k1000
Common questions
Footer
Update your settings
Required Cookies & Technologies
Personalized Advertising
Asahi Super-Takumar 35mm F/2 | LENS-DB.COM
- Article author: lens-db.com
- Reviews from users: 31982 Ratings
- Top rated: 3.4
- Lowest rated: 1
- Summary of article content: Articles about Asahi Super-Takumar 35mm F/2 | LENS-DB.COM One of the fastest we-angle lenses for 35mm single-lens reflex cameras. Edge-to-edge sharp resolution at full aperture; unique lens design without distortion; … …
- Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for Asahi Super-Takumar 35mm F/2 | LENS-DB.COM One of the fastest we-angle lenses for 35mm single-lens reflex cameras. Edge-to-edge sharp resolution at full aperture; unique lens design without distortion; … Wide-angle prime lens. Announced: 1963. Production status: Discontinued. Maximum format: 35mm full frame. Mount: M42. Diaphragm type: Automatic. Fast speed. Automatic diaphragm. 5 aperture blades. Manual focus only.
- Table of Contents:
Mua PENTAX Super TAKUMAR 35mm F/3.5 MF Lens (M42 / thread mount) trên Amazon Mỹ chính hãng 2022 | Fado
- Article author: fado.vn
- Reviews from users: 38656 Ratings
- Top rated: 4.9
- Lowest rated: 1
- Summary of article content: Articles about Mua PENTAX Super TAKUMAR 35mm F/3.5 MF Lens (M42 / thread mount) trên Amazon Mỹ chính hãng 2022 | Fado Mua sản phẩm PENTAX Super TAKUMAR 35mm F/3.5 MF Lens (M42 / thread mount) trên Amazon Mỹ chính hãng 2022 | Fado. …
- Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for Mua PENTAX Super TAKUMAR 35mm F/3.5 MF Lens (M42 / thread mount) trên Amazon Mỹ chính hãng 2022 | Fado Mua sản phẩm PENTAX Super TAKUMAR 35mm F/3.5 MF Lens (M42 / thread mount) trên Amazon Mỹ chính hãng 2022 | Fado. PENTAX,Super,TAKUMAR,35mm,F/3.5,MF,Lens,(M42,/,thread,mount)Mua sản phẩm PENTAX Super TAKUMAR 35mm F/3.5 MF Lens (M42 / thread mount) trên Amazon Mỹ chính hãng 2022 | Fado
- Table of Contents:
PENTAX S-M-C Takumar 35MM f2 M42 photos on Flickr | Flickr
- Article author: www.flickr.com
- Reviews from users: 43246 Ratings
- Top rated: 3.1
- Lowest rated: 1
- Summary of article content: Articles about PENTAX S-M-C Takumar 35MM f2 M42 photos on Flickr | Flickr Flickr photos, groups, and tags related to the “PENTAX S-M-C Takumar 35MM f2 M42” Flickr tag. …
- Most searched keywords: Whether you are looking for PENTAX S-M-C Takumar 35MM f2 M42 photos on Flickr | Flickr Flickr photos, groups, and tags related to the “PENTAX S-M-C Takumar 35MM f2 M42” Flickr tag. Flickr photos, groups, and tags related to the “PENTAX S-M-C Takumar 35MM f2 M42” Flickr tag.
- Table of Contents:
See more articles in the same category here: Chewathai27.com/to/blog.
S-M-C/Super Takumar 35mm F2 Reviews
Author: Sort Reviews by: Date | Author | Rating | Recommendation | Likes (Descending) Showing Reviews 1-15 of 20 lumenchaser Site Supporter
Registered: May, 2019 Location: Vancouver, BC Posts: 122
1 user found this helpful Lens Review Date: November 17, 2019 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $85.00 | Rating: 9
Pros: Build quality; short throw focusing; compact size; low light performance. Cons: Somewhat soft @ f/2. Sharpness: 8 Aberrations: 9 Bokeh: 8 Handling: 10 Value: 10 Camera Used: Spotmatic F and A7II (adapted)
I have the SMC Super Takumar 49mm filter size version, which seems to get panned a lot more than it deserves. This may be, in part, because lens sharpness is all the rage today. Without a doubt, using this lens on today’s DSLRs will reveal some shortcomings–but this is true of any vintage lens from this era. In some ways, the astonishing quality of other Super Takumar lenses may make us a bit too-critical of the lesser lenses in this lineup. What it really boils down to is how much you value the qualities this lens does possess.
What are those qualities? Well, for starters, it’s small, fast, lightweight, and quick-focusing due to its short-throw focusing arc. It also produces some nice bokeh provided the background isn’t too busy. Good luck trying to find a modern autofocus 35mm with these qualities.
Where this baby really shines is when it’s paired natively with a Spotmatic camera. It’s a gem for shooting street images. Set a reasonable aperture, employ zone focusing, and walk around with confidence that this lens will deliver the goods.
In the end, only you can decide how these qualities measure up against its heavier, more expensive, somewhat better performing sister lens. All I’m asking is that you give this lens serious consideration. To my mind, it more than meets my needs and makes me smile–shot after shot, and year after year. dwihendro New Member
Registered: May, 2013 Location: Jakarta Posts: 2 Lens Review Date: March 18, 2018 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $110.00 | Rating: 8
Pros: built, color, good for low light capture, handling Cons: flare @wide open, sharpness Sharpness: 7 Aberrations: 7 Bokeh: 8 Handling: 9 Value: 7 Camera Used: MV, MESuper, A7, XE2
mine is 67mm diameter version
pros: built, color, handling, good for low light capture
cons: flare at wide open, getting sharp @f2.8, rare, price iantimothy New Member
Registered: April, 2015 Posts: 3
8 user s found this helpful Lens Review Date: November 19, 2016 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $150.00 | Rating: 10
Pros: Sharp Cons: large size Sharpness: 10 Aberrations: 10 Bokeh: 8 Handling: 10 Value: 10 Camera Used: S1a – SV
I am reviewing the early 35mm f2.0 with the 67mm filter thread. My example is mint and would be considered as new. My SV and S1a cameras are CLa’d by Erik and function as new. I feel it is important to be clear about the condition of the lens and camera before continuing with the review.
Being confident of a sharp image on the focusing screen must be fundamental to the image quality on the film plane. If the camera is not in the best of condition particularly the Frenzel screen there will be difficulty in pin sharp focus.
Distortion; There is a little barreling at the extream edges of the frame. I find this acceptable as one can quickly raise the enlarger 5% over image size and entirely eliminate this problem. If one indeed considers it a problem.
Fall Off – Vignetting; At f2.0 there is a slight vignetting in the corners of the frame, although I most often ‘burn in’ the edges of my prints, so this has never been a significant problem to me. By f4.0 the ‘problem’ is non-existent.
Contrast; At f2.0 contrast is average, although if you understand that this is not a disadvantage in certain situations, for example when photographing a high contrast subject or using a digital full frame, it will not prevent a photographer from investing in this lens. At 2.8 there is an improvement at f8.0 contrast is one grade of paper higher than wide open. I use Fomapan 100 and Rodinal 50+1 for 9 minutes and incident light reading for most of my work. Other film developer combinations will give differing contrast ratios. From my perspective even wide open I have no concerns about contrast. In the darkroom it is easy to increase a half grade, so no problems here.
Sharpness; The variation in reviewers comments upon the sharpness of this lens is interesting. Mounted on a tripod and focused carefully, at f2.0 the lens is impressive. The usual culprits of poor focus and camera shake must be one of its greatest enemies. I would use it at f2.0 without a second thought. At f4.0 and up to the half stop between 8 and 11 it will out resolve Tri-X. At 4 – 5.6 – 8 it is razor sharp with any correctly developed medium speed film (I tested Foma 100 ~ FP4s ~ Agfa 80s developed in D76 and the high acutance Rodinal combinations with this lens).
Conclusion; Look for a mint lens and pay a premium price or find a user without fungus or mist and have it serviced. It is a large and rewarding lens to use and my mint example is destined to become a ‘user’ it is as good as ANY 35mm I own. The weight of the lens and the now universally accepted quality of the S1a and SV bodies compliment each other very well indeed. I suspect ‘pilot error’ has much to do with focusing problems. The film photographer needs to have a full understanding of the way film/developer combinations affect the perceived sharpness of the final image.
I use about 100ft of 35mm film a month (20 x 30 exposure reloads) and between 6-8 rolls of E6 transparency film. I have an extensive knowledge of film and processing on a professional level. From this platform of experience, I feel there needs to be a clear understanding about older lenses used with digital sensors. Especially when reviewing an early M42 lens on a modern body using third party converters, other than a Pentax with a K mount converter. I tested 28mm 35mm 50mm 85mm Takumars and SMC on my 5d and there was no way I could achieve consistent results with focusing. About 10 % were way off. I believe there needs to be caution when reviewing lenses outside of the design parameters.
When digital videographers began to use 35mm prime lenses in the search for a so-called cinema effect, and digital stills photographers began to explore the possibilities of these older lenses. A new world of artistic possibilities was created. I suspect they expect too much from the lenses, not that the lenses ‘underperform.’ I suspect the converters are not 100% perfect and the older optics do not work to the sensors best advantage. And to achieve sharp focus is not as easy as it is with an autofocus lens. My Canon AF full frame is superb and not one manual focus vintage lenses returns as consistent results as the specifically designed lenses on this body. Leica, Nikon and Pentax K are the exception but remember lenses and the film – sensor position on the manufacturer bodies is exact to their lenses.
Photographers will continue to use these lenses because of the exceptional build quality and so long as the film, chemistry and paper are manufactured the ‘art’ of wet photography will allow them to be used in the exact way for which they were designed. I find it interesting this early 35mm f2.0 is often given poor reviews, my specimen is an exceptional performer and I end with the sentiments I wrote at the beginning of the review. Mounted on a camera which is maintained to first class order it will provide superb results. Jean Poitiers Pentaxian
Registered: April, 2011 Location: Lost in translation … Posts: 18,044
2 user s found this helpful Lens Review Date: March 1, 2016 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: N/A | Rating: 9
Pros: Nice bokeh, can be quite sharp, build & handling … Cons: Flare, 67mm filters for version 1 Sharpness: 9 Aberrations: 8 Bokeh: 10 Handling: 9 Value: 9 Camera Used: K-3
Bonjour,
My review is for the “first version” ST 35/2 with the 67mm thread.
Overall I find it to be a very cable lens and the sharpness is more than adequate from f/2.8 and on …
I am not one to write long detailed reviews, so I will let a few images do the “speaking” … all taken on K-3
Backlit B&W with a bit of flare … by Jean Poitiers, on Flickr
Empty candle holders by Jean Poitiers, on Flickr
Two hands, three balls by Jean Poitiers, on Flickr
Ceramic flowers on marble tomb by Jean Poitiers, on Flickr
Artichoke flower by Jean Poitiers, on Flickr satmary New Member
Registered: November, 2012 Location: Southern California Posts: 7
2 user s found this helpful Lens Review Date: September 21, 2015 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $130.00 | Rating: 9
Pros: great bokeh, very sharp at 2.8 Cons: nothing really, slightly yellowish tone Sharpness: 9 Aberrations: 9 Bokeh: 10 Handling: 9 Value: 10 Camera Used: Canon AE-1 Program, 5D Mark II/III
I bought this lens in early 2013, (although I’m posting this in later 2015). So the price of $130.00 is probably outdated/higher, since everyone has been going crazy over the super multi coated takumar lenses since 2013.
ANYWAYS. This lens is great. I also have the 50mm 1.4, 28mm 3.5, 105mm 2.8, 135mm 3.5 takumars too.
And I gotta say, this 35mm is probably right under the 50mm in terms of how much I love it.
DrOMM New Member
Registered: August, 2015 Posts: 1
2 user s found this helpful Lens Review Date: August 16, 2015 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $150.00 | Rating: 9
Pros: Handling, Imaging Performance Cons: Flare, Price Sharpness: 9 Aberrations: 7 Bokeh: 7 Handling: 10 Value: 8 Camera Used: Sony Alpha 6000
I am using this lens (67mm Super Takumar version) on a Sony Alpha 6000 (APS-C). The lens is quite heavy, but has its special strenghts (imaging quality, colors) with good light conditions and for night photography. I especially like, how the lens renders lights at night.
Here are two of my favorite shots (not in original resolution):
These and more photos can also be found in full resolution on my Flickr account:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dromm/tags/takumar35/
In my view, in good light conditions and at night, this lens is even better than the highly praised Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35/2.4
Highly recommended!
Olaf eugene1979 Forum Member
Registered: October, 2014 Posts: 85
3 user s found this helpful Lens Review Date: November 4, 2014 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $250.00 | Rating: 9
Pros: sharp, build quality Cons: average bokeh Sharpness: 10 Aberrations: 8 Bokeh: 7 Handling: 10 Value: 10
All in all the Super-Takumar 1:2/35 (49mm filter thread) could be considered as a good manual standard prime lens for the modern APS-C digital cameras. Besides it’s also a fast lens so you have the opportunity to experiment with the depth of field and bokeh (but don’t expect the impressive results as with 1.8 or 1.4 lenses) and shoot in such light conditions where you usually get boring and noisy images with your 18-55mm F/3.5-5.6 kit lens. Plus the depth of field provided by this lens is not very narrow so you won’t miss the focus and the manual focusing ring is comfortable and accurate. You can easily take this lens on a trip and you’ll get the images which for sure will be reviewed by you far more than once.
My review of my copy of the lens with shots made at different apertures:
http://aflenses.net/reviews/a-subjective-look-at-asahi-super-takumar-f2-35-d…ujifilm-x-pro1 dfujevec Senior Member
Registered: November, 2009 Location: Slovenija Posts: 145
1 user found this helpful Lens Review Date: June 4, 2014 I can recommend this lens: No | Price: $120.00 | Rating: 5
Pros: small, good build quality Cons: mediocre optics, yellowing Sharpness: 5 Aberrations: 7 Bokeh: 8 Handling: 8 Value: 6 Camera Used: Canon EOS 5DmkII
This is FF review of the lens. I have two copies of this lens, Super Takumar V2 and S-M-C Takumar, both are optically mediocre, wide open sharpness is not good, maybe good enough for portret but 35mm lens is not really portret lens. By f4 lens become sharp enough in the center but FF corners are still poor, by f5.6-f8 there is sweet point of the lens, but corners are barely acceptable. There is also very visible field curvature. After achieving first one (super Tak version) i thought that I have lemon, but the second one (s-m-c version) which is in mint condition works the same way. Auto Takumar 35mm f2,3 and Takumar 35mm f3,5 are both much better lens. Both are at f5,6 very sharp across all FF frame.
Here is wide open photo with S-M-C Takumar 35mm f2
MKvip Beauty New Member
Registered: October, 2013 Location: Karlsruhe, Germany Posts: 18
2 user s found this helpful Lens Review Date: December 4, 2013 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $110.00 | Rating: 9
Pros: small and handy but w/ typical Tak build, sharp wide open Cons: ugly bokeh with busy backgrounds Sharpness: 10 Aberrations: 10 Bokeh: 8 Handling: 10 Value: 10 Camera Used: CANON EOS 60D
Got a mint S-M-C copy y’day, here a few observations from my 1st test:
– quite sharp wide open if you focus correctly. Contrast is relatively low even with hood, but hey, what’s Photoshop there for?
– CA is very good controlled for a lens of this age – nothing Adobe Camera Raw can’t handle w/o any problems. Actually my CANON EF 85mm /1.8 is worse 🙂
– flare control, especially with a hood, is outstanding – which makes it perfekt for backlit portraits
– Bokeh is great IF the background is not too busy – if it is it gets real ugly real fast 🙁 Here a relatively harmless example – I really don’t want to have the real bad ones in my photostream 😉
OK, that out of the way let’s get to the nice ones – all shot wide open on an APS-C CANON 60D. As I did the flickr lens pictures of this Tak with my Zenit Helios 44-3 58mm /2, I let the Tak return the favor:
…and while I was at it, my Pentacon 135mm /2.8 got jealous and wanted out of the bag 🙂
This Tak looks like the perfekt lens to do eBay product pictures:
Next is a picture I did to check on CA and handling of fine lines – see for yourself, best in the large resolution on Flickr:
…and now lots of nice bokeh following:
Looks like it’s the perfect lens for portraits – I’ll take it with me on my next shooting with a model and give it a try 🙂
If you shoot in situations with shallow DOF be very careful about the background – you want to avoid a busy one or the resulting bokeh will be very harsh and not pleasing. Otherwise I can recommend this lil beauty wholeheartedly – it has the typical Tak build and feel and it is quite sharp wide open.
More test pictures and a few of the lens itself can be found here .
cheers
mike toukan Senior Member
Registered: May, 2012 Posts: 140 Lens Review Date: October 17, 2013 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $50.00 | Rating: 9
Pros: color rendition, overall image quality Cons: flare, sharpness Sharpness: 8 Aberrations: 7 Bokeh: 8 Handling: 10 Value: 10 Camera Used: K-5II
I have only had this lens for a week or so, but have taken it out a couple of times. Note, I put $50 as the price, but in actuality, I paid $50 combined for this lens and a Super Tak 135/3.5. But the seller was not a Pentax guy so I don’t think he appreciated these lenses. Overall, my assessment would be that this lens is greater than the sum of its parts. As others have said, not so sharp wide open, but does sharpen up stopped down. Having read the reviews before buying, i haven’t really even taken many pics at F2 yet, but at F4, F5.6, it sharpens up well. But the real strength is in the color rendition, and the warm images it creates. Like all the Takumars, the lens is a pleasure to use, with buttery smooth focusing, well-defined aperture stops, and balance on the camera. I have the Super Takumar version, and it is definitely prone to flare. However, i don’t see any CA, but without a hood, pointed in the direction of the light source, some of my shots are totally washed out, or have the artifact (not sure if that is the right term) that appears to be the aperture shape superimposed on the image. So to sum it up, while this lens does have its limitations, if you know what they are and work within them, it can produce some beautiful images, and it is a pleasure to use. viking79 New Member
Registered: January, 2008 Location: Marion, IA Posts: 15
1 user found this helpful Lens Review Date: May 13, 2012 I can recommend this lens: No | Price: N/A | Rating: 5
Pros: Build Quality, Size for Aperture Cons: Image Quality (resolution, sharpness, flare) Sharpness: 5 Aberrations: 4 Bokeh: 5 Handling: 9 Value: 5 Camera Used: NEX 3
The lens is soft wide open, not great stopped down. The lateral CA is very high, longitudinal CA is noticeable at f/2. The lens has a lot of coma, spherical aberrations, some astigmatism. Terrible flare performance on the Super Takumar with 49mm threads. The DA 35mm f/2.4 out performs it by a large margin. However, it does offer unique character. It works well with a lower resolution camera like the Sigma SD14 or if you aren’t pixel peeping it should be acceptable. The bokeh will be visible at any level though. Pepe Guitarra Site Supporter
Registered: November, 2010 Location: California Posts: 2,223
2 user s found this helpful Lens Review Date: August 28, 2011 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $180.00 | Rating: 10
Pros: Everything, what do you expect, it is a Super Takumar Cons: You are kidding, aren’t you? Sharpness: 10 Aberrations: 10 Bokeh: 10 Handling: 10 Value: 10
This lens is one of the best lenses I ever used. More later with some samples.
Update: January 15, 2015
I had forgotten about this lens until now. Here are some samples:
SMCTak35-2-LittleTokyo1-1 by Palenquero, on Flickr
SMCTak35-2-LittleTokyo3-1 by Palenquero, on Flickr
SMCTak35-2-Ambulance-1 by Palenquero, on Flickr
SMCTak35-2-Downtown1-1 by Palenquero, on Flickr
SMCTak35-2-Museum1-1 by Palenquero, on Flickr
SMCTak35-2-lmu2-1 by Palenquero, on Flickr Steinback Veteran Member
Registered: January, 2008 Location: GTA, ON, Canada Posts: 1,673 Lens Review Date: November 12, 2010 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $120.00 | Rating: 9
Pros: Small, Sharp, Fast Cons: all manual
I have the 49mm filter Super Takumar. I wouldn’t have paid any more than I did for the Super Takumar version, but 120 was for an almost spotless copy at a camera show and I had been watching for a nice 35mm f/2 for several years.
I’m very happy with the colours and sharpness, and have been using the lens as a general purpose “normal” prime on my K10d with a lens hood originally intended for a 50mm focal length. I would suggest finding an appropriate hood to boost contrast and reduce the likelihood of flaring.
Samples: http://www.flickr.com/photos/steinback/sets/72157625201463936/ ProfHankD Junior Member
Registered: August, 2009 Location: Lexington, KY Posts: 30
4 user s found this helpful Lens Review Date: November 20, 2009 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $125.00 | Rating: 9
Pros: Tiny, fast, flare-resistant, S-M-C Takumar Cons: None Sharpness: 9 Aberrations: 9 Bokeh: 8 Handling: 10 Value: 8
This is for an S-M-C version on a 14MP 1.5X crop digital. The lens is “minty” except for a tiny nick in the front element, which only shows up as a small dark spot in the PSF (point spread function) — no worse than dust I’ve seen in some other lenses. There is no significant yellowing visible for my copy when holding a white sheet of paper behind it.
I have had a 35mm f/3.5 Super Takumar for a while, and it is a remarkable little lens… so I had some doubt that this f/2.0 would be an upgrade… it is!
I’ve quickly but well tested this lens and it seems to have the same crispness that the f/3.5 does. Colors are similar, but the f/2.0 is less intense and very natural when stopped down, which can be good or bad.
My copy is absolutely fine wide-open, but depth-of-focus is thinner than I expected, which might account for the feelings others expressed about softness wide open. My experiences with yellowed 50mm f/1.4 Taks suggest that yellowed lenses are also optically a tad off (yellowing changes refractive index slightly? — but UV exposure fixes it), and that’s another possible explanation. Anyway, no sharpness problems here. There is the very slightest glow around some high-contrast edges wide open, but its more character than defect. Here’s an example:
Notice that the transition to out-of-focus is exceptionally smooth, but the bokeh have nasty ring artifacts. This is the result of the combination of a relatively short focal length and a PSF that has both a bright center (good) and relatively subtle build to a very thin outer ring (bad). Overall, it is usually pleasing, but not reliably so — you have to watch it.
Stopping down increases depth of field and sharpens things a little, especially in the corners. Optimal performance is around f/5.6-f/8, at which point it is outresolving a 14MP APS-C sensor across the frame, but not quite at MTF 50. Stopped-down colors are very neutral and not overly intense as they are with the f/3.5; this looks like a photojournalism lens, which it historically is. For example:
Flare resistance is nothing short of spectacular. I could not get more than a single minor spot or a very faint partial ring. Unlike many other Takumars, including the SMC 50mm f/1.4, it never seems to go to a contrast wash-out. What’s even more impressive is that I don’t even have the hood. Here’s a typical sun-in-the-shot image:
Although it is much bigger than the f/3.5, this lens is truly tiny for an f/2.0 retrofocus design. Build quality is very smooth and solid… like most other Takumars I own.
Only gripe: price. It took a while for me to find an S-M-C at this cost, whereas the Super Takumar version is sometimes under $100. I’m not sure the S-M-C version is worth the price premium, but flare control is quite remarkable on this lens. Honestly, this lens would not be a bad buy at $200. Josef Josefsson New Member
Registered: March, 2009 Posts: 4 Lens Review Date: March 3, 2009 I can recommend this lens: Yes | Price: $80.00 | Rating: 8
Pros: built quality, quick focussing Cons: soft wide open
I have this lens for just a few months, but it´s almost one of my favourites. The built quality is outstanding and focusing is as smooth as it can get.
There´s also nothing to moan about it´s optical qualitys. But it´s somehow soft wide open… and the bokeh is not the best. Nothing to worry about… just don´t expect any miracles from this approx. 30-40 year old lens.
Asahi Super-Takumar 35mm F/2
Lens hood
A lens hood or lens shade is a device used on the end of a lens to block the sun or other light source in order to prevent glare and lens flare. Flare occurs when stray light strikes the front element of a lens and then bounces around within the lens. This stray light often comes from very bright light sources, such as the sun, bright studio lights, or a bright white background.
The geometry of the lens hood can vary from a plain cylindrical or conical section to a more complex shape, sometimes called a petal, tulip, or flower hood. This allows the lens hood to block stray light with the higher portions of the lens hood, while allowing more light into the corners of the image through the lowered portions of the hood.
Lens hoods are more prominent in long focus lenses because they have a smaller viewing angle than that of wide-angle lenses. For wide angle lenses, the length of the hood cannot be as long as those for telephoto lenses, as a longer hood would enter the wider field of view of the lens.
Lens hoods are often designed to fit onto the matching lens facing either forward, for normal use, or backwards, so that the hood may be stored with the lens without occupying much additional space. In addition, lens hoods can offer some degree of physical protection for the lens due to the hood extending farther than the lens itself.
PENTAX S-M-C Takumar 35MM f2 M42 photos on Flickr
Radioactive lenses — group shot:
(a bit drab, not a very colorful group)
These lenses exhibit low-level radioactivity, probably caused by Thorium Oxide added to the glass to enhance its optical properties.
Top Row (Left to Right):
– CANON LENS FL 58mm 1:1.2
– CANON LENS FD 35mm 1:2 (chrome filter ring)
– CANON LENS FD 55mm 1:1.2 S.S.C. ASPHERICAL
– CANON LENS FD 17mm 1:4 S.S.C.
– CANON LENS FL 50mm 1:1.8
Middle Row (Left to Right):
– AUTO YASHINON-DX 1:1.4 f=50mm YASHICA
– AUTO YASHINON-DS 50mm 1:1.7 YASHICA
– ASAHI OPT. Co. JAPAN Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:2/35
– ASAHI OPT. Co. JAPAN Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:1.8/50
– ASAHI OPT. Co. JAPAN Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:1.4/50
Bottom Row (Left to Right):
– Ernst Leitz GmbH Wetzlar Summicron f=5cm 1:2 (collapsible, M39)
– OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM G.ZUIKO AUTO-S 1:1.4 f=50mm (early)
– FUJINON 1:1.4/50 FUIJI PHOTO FILM CO. (metal focus ring)
– UV TOPCOR 1:2 f=50mm TOKYO KOGAKU
– RE GN TOPCOR M 1:1.4 f=50mm TOKYO KOGAKU
Taken with Canon T2i (550D) with Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 lens. ISO 100, f/8, 0.3 sec
During the shot, the level of gamma radiation measured at the camera (about 0.5 meter above the lenses) was about 4-5x normal background, as measured with a Ludlum 44-2 NaI scintillation probe. One meter away, the level dropped to about 2x normal. (Ludlum 2221 settings: HV=775V, threshold(LLD)=10mV, background about 1900 CPM).
.
.
==============================
Measurements (informal, unscientific)
==============================
. . ——————————————————————–
1) Surface (near contact) readings with geiger counter
. . ——————————————————————–
These are the typical readings where the Geiger Mueller tube is pressed up as close to the front or rear glass as possible.
Ludlum Model 2221 Scaler/ratemeter, with Ludlum 44-9 Pancake GM probe
Settings: High Voltage = 900V, Threshold (LLD) = 55mV
The 4 readings on each row are “F=r1/r2 R=r3/r4 CPM [x%]”
– r1 = close to front
– r2 = close to front with plastic cap (little/no alpha, some beta, most gamma)
– r3 = close to rear
– r4 = close to rear with plastic cap (little/no alpha, some beta, most gamma)
– x% = Max(r1,r3)-background / same value for Pentax 50/1.4 S-M-C Takumar
Lens caps off, focus at infinity, aperture fully open (may not affect some lenses)
Each reading was a 10 minute average.
Plastic cap off – background level was about 28CPM (26-30) – from 2×10 min averages.
Plastic cap on – background level was about 27CPM (25-29) – from 4×10 min averages.
Lens:
F=r1/r2 R=r3/r4 CPM Readings
——————————————
Slightly radioactive lenses: (not in group shot — low radioactivity)
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Nikon Micro-Nikkor AI-S 200mm f/4: (not in group shot — too tall, would be fuzzy)
F=92/53 R=28/29 CPM [0.2%]
Canon FL 28mm f/3.5:
F=34/34 R=102/65 CPM [0.3%]
Canon EF 135mm f/2 L:
F=167/74 R=28/32 CPM [0.5%]
Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L:
F=170/69 R=27/26 CPM [0.5%]
Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 L:
F=170/72 R=29/27 CPM [0.5%]
.
Radioactive lenses (presumably with thorium):
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Pentax S-M-C Takumar 20mm f/4.5: (not in picture)
F=60/59 R=705/456 CPM [3%]
Olympus Zuiko MC Macro 20mm f/3.5: (not in group shot — too small, no lenscap)
F=818/342 R=37/33 CPM [3%]
Pentax S-M-C Macro Takumar 50mm f/4: (not in picture)
F=1034/371 R=1754/667 CPM [6%]
Canon FD 35mm f/2 (concave):
F=524/473 R=1422/1061 CPM [5%]
Topcon UV Topcor 50mm f/2:
F=212/190 R=1427/933 CPM [5%]
Yashica Auto Yashinon-DX 50mm f/1.4:
F=54/47 R=2715/1157 CPM [10%]
Canon FL 58mm f/1.2:
F=481/449 R=3074/2321 CPM [11%]
Nikon Nikkor-N 35mm f/1.4: (not in picture)
F=1697/1544 R=3051/2395 [11%]
Yashica Auto Yashinon-DS 50mm f/1.7:
F=525/466 R=3434/2474 CPM [13%]
Topcon RE GN Topcor 50mm f/1.4:
F=623/591 R=4483/3278 CPM [17%]
Steinheil Auto-Quinon 55mm f/1.9 KE mount (chrome, black arm):
F=6542/2661 R=184/165 CPM [24%]
Canon Lens FD 17mm f/4:
F=126/96 R=8957/3635 CPM [33%]
Olympus G.Zuiko 50mm f/1.4:
F=12238/5397 R=201/191 CPM [46%]
Canon FL 50mm f/1.8:
F=95/85 R=14116/5346 CPM [53%]
{Super Canomatic R 50mm f/1.8 is about the same}
Pentax S-M-C Takumar 55mm f/1.8:
F=194/169 R=17251/7028 CPM [64%]
Leica Collapsible Summicron 50mm f/2 (M39):
F=17769/7597 R=863/668 CPM [66%]
Pentax S-M-C Takumar 35mm f/2 (49mm filter):
F=738/641 R=18663/8336 CPM [70%]
CZJ Pancolar 50mm f/1.8 (zebra)
F=18670/7996 R=19313/7869 CPM [72%]
Auto Rikenon 55mm f/1.4:
F=132/129 R=22937/7565 CPM [85%]
AUTO mamiya/sekor 55mm f/1.4 (M42, chrome+black, flat rear glass)
F=2500/2008 R=26078/8430 CPM [97%]
Pentax S-M-C Takumar 50mm f/1.4:
F=858/778 R=26838/12512 CPM [100%]
Canon FD 55mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical:
F=33251/16713 R=6226/4725 CPM [124%]
Fujica Fujinon 50mm f/1.4 (old style):
F=26115/13222 R=35197/16306 CPM [131%]
Konica Hexanon AR EE 57mm f/1.2 (green EE):
F=40328/17606 R=28597/10412 CPM [150%]
.
.
.
========================================
. —————————————————————
2) Gamma counts 100mm away from side of lens
. —————————————————————
These readings should give a better indication of how much exposure you’d get farther away from the lens.
Ludlum Model 2221 Scaler/Ratemeter, with Ludlum 44-10 “high energy” gamma scintillation probe (2″ x 2″ NaI)
Settings: High Voltage = 850V (middle of 500v-1200v range), Threshold (discriminator) = 10mV. These settings gave a background reading of about 4400 CPM, which is near the minimum that this probe is supposed to read for the background. I wonder if the NaI crystal is degraded?
Method: The probe was placed horizontally on a table, with a small amount of lead shielding near the crystal. This reduced the background reading to about 1500cpm. The lens being measured was placed with the “hotter” end (front or back) downward, at the same level as the bottom of the probe. The lens was wide open (if possible), focused at infinity (if possible), and had both front and rear caps on (correct caps, when available). A 10 minute run with the 2221 scaler was done, and compared to 10 minute runs with no lens (background).
In the table, the “xxx CPM”, value is xxx = (C-B)/10, where C is the 10-minute count 100mm away from the lens, and B is the 10-minute (shielded) background count. The “[ppp%] is the xxx value for this lens compared to the xxx value for the 50mm f/1.4 S-M-C Takumar, computed as a percent.
.
Lens:
xxx CPM [ppp%]
————————————————-
Olympus Zuiko MC Macro 20mm f/3.5:
132 CPM [0.5%]
Yashica Auto Yashinon-DX 50mm f/1.4:
1043 CPM [4%]
Pentax S-M-C Macro Takumar 50mm f/4:
1410 CPM [6%]
Pentax S-M-C Takumar 20mm f/4.5:
1447 CPM [6%]
Canon Super-Canomatic R 50mm f/1.8:
2292 CPM [9%]
Canon FL 50mm f/1.8:
2393 CPM [10%]
Canon Lens FD 17mm f/4:
3129 CPM [13%]
Steinheil Auto-Quinon 55mm f/1.9 KE mount (chrome, black arm):
3774 CPM [15%]
Topcon UV Topcor 50mm f/2:
4146 CPM [17%]
Pentax S-M-C Takumar 55mm f/1.8:
4790 CPM [20%]
Olympus G.Zuiko 50mm f/1.4:
5042 CPM [21%]
Auto Rikenon 55mm f/1.4:
5750 CPM [24%]
Leica Collapsible Summicron 50mm f/2 (M39):
7576 CPM [31%]
Minolta MC W.Rokkor – SI 28mm f/2.5:
11241 CPM [46%]
Yashica Auto Yashinon-DS 50mm f/1.7:
12018 CPM [49%]
Canon FD 35mm f/2 (concave):
14463 CPM [59%]
Topcon RE GN Topcor 50mm f/1.4:
19108 CPM [78%]
Canon FL 58mm f/1.2:
19290 CPM [79%]
Canon Super-Canomatic R 58mm f/1.2:
19328 CPM [79%]
Pentax S-M-C Takumar 35mm f/2 (49mm filter):
20087 CPM [82%]
AUTO mamiya/sekor 55mm f/1.4 (M42, chrome+black, flat rear glass)
21251 CPM [87%]
CJZ Pancolar 50mm f/1.8 (zebra):
23849 CPM [98%]
Pentax S-M-C Takumar 50mm f/1.4:
24350 CPM [100%]
Nikon 35mm f/1.4 NIKKOR-N:
30571 [126%]
Konica Hexanon AR EE 57mm f/1.2 (green EE):
30656 CPM [126%]
Fujica Fujinon 50mm f/1.4 (old style):
36486 CPM [150%]
Canon FD 55mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical:
46532 CPM [191%]
Note: There is no detectable gamma radiation coming out from four of the lenses marked “slightly radioactive” in the first section, so they do not appear in this section.
So you have finished reading the super takumar 35mm f2 topic article, if you find this article useful, please share it. Thank you very much. See more: super takumar 35mm f2 radioactive, super takumar 35mm f2 review, Takumar 35mm f2, Super Takumar 35mm f3 5, Super Takumar 105mm f2 8, Takumar 35mm f2 3, takumar 35mm f2 flickr, Takumar 55mm f2
